On Jul 22, 2010, at 7:10 , dave b wrote:
> On 22 July 2010 05:47, Bob Archer wrote:
>>
>>> On 22 July 2010 03:12, dave b wrote:
On 22 July 2010 02:58, Bolstridge, Andrew
wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> excuse to say "we told you so".
>> "NTFS supports two slightly di
On 22 July 2010 05:47, Bob Archer wrote:
>
>> On 22 July 2010 03:12, dave b wrote:
>> > On 22 July 2010 02:58, Bolstridge, Andrew
>> > wrote:
>> >>> -Original Message-
>> >>> excuse to say "we told you so".
> "NTFS supports two slightly different modes of operation that can be selected
Thanks for acting on this! I wish I had the time to actually fix the
bugs people show me these days.
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 2:40 PM, wrote:
> Author: rhuijben
> Date: Wed Jul 21 21:40:10 2010
> New Revision: 966431
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=966431&view=rev
> Log:
> Following up
> -Original Message-
> From: Greg Stein [mailto:gst...@gmail.com]
> Sent: donderdag 22 juli 2010 0:30
> To: Bert Huijben
> Cc: dev@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: svn commit: r966381 -
> /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/wc_db.c
>
> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 16:15, Bert Huijben
> -Original Message-
> From: phi...@apache.org [mailto:phi...@apache.org]
> Sent: woensdag 21 juli 2010 18:53
> To: comm...@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: svn commit: r966312 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion:
> include/ libsvn_client/ libsvn_wc/
>
> Author: philip
> Date: Wed Jul 21 1
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 16:15, Bert Huijben wrote:
>...
> This last commit and the few previous (r966279, r966300 (fixes missing
> #endif) and more important r966313), fixed the last few remaining issues on
> upgrading to in-db properties.
>
> We still have the issue #2530 error, that makes the
Sweet. I'll get these revisions reviewed over the next 24 hours. Thanks!
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 16:15, Bert Huijben wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: rhuij...@apache.org [mailto:rhuij...@apache.org]
>> Sent: woensdag 21 juli 2010 21:44
>> To: comm...@subversion.apache.org
>> Subject:
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 9:03 PM, Philip Martin
wrote:
> hwri...@apache.org writes:
>
>> Author: hwright
>> Date: Wed Jul 21 19:06:11 2010
>> New Revision: 966366
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=966366&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Rev the client mkdir API to return commit info through the ctx ca
hwri...@apache.org writes:
> Author: hwright
> Date: Wed Jul 21 19:06:11 2010
> New Revision: 966366
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=966366&view=rev
> Log:
> Rev the client mkdir API to return commit info through the ctx callback.
> +svn_error_t *
> +svn_client_mkdir3(svn_commit_info_t
> -Original Message-
> From: rhuij...@apache.org [mailto:rhuij...@apache.org]
> Sent: woensdag 21 juli 2010 21:44
> To: comm...@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: svn commit: r966381 -
> /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/wc_db.c
>
> Author: rhuijben
> Date: Wed Jul 21 19:44:05 2010
> Ne
> On 22 July 2010 03:12, dave b wrote:
> > On 22 July 2010 02:58, Bolstridge, Andrew
> > wrote:
> >>> -Original Message-
> >>> excuse to say "we told you so".
> >>
> >> Considering Windows is case-insensitive, how do you expect to be
> able to see folder FOO and foo inside folder bar? I
Hi Stefan,
Stefan Sperling writes:
> Copy of what and when? This baton is global for the entire edit...
>
> Going through the code, I see that you're using this to indicate to
> dump_node() whether an add_directory() or add_file() was in fact a copy.
> Why not remove this field from the struct an
Hi Jonathan,
I stashed this review away while working on some other important
changes. I finally got around to responding to this review- sorry that
it took so long.
Jonathan Nieder writes:
> > Fill in replay_revstart to dump the revprops at the start of every
> > revision. Add an additional writ
On 22 July 2010 03:12, dave b wrote:
> On 22 July 2010 02:58, Bolstridge, Andrew
> wrote:
>>> -Original Message-
>>> excuse to say "we told you so".
>>
>> Considering Windows is case-insensitive, how do you expect to be able to see
>> folder FOO and foo inside folder bar? I think
Just
On 22 July 2010 02:58, Bolstridge, Andrew
wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> excuse to say "we told you so".
>
> Considering Windows is case-insensitive, how do you expect to be able to see
> folder FOO and foo inside folder bar? I think
Actually NTFS IS CASE sensitive - so you are wrong :)
> -Original Message-
> From: dave b [mailto:db.pub.m...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 2:05 PM
> To: dev@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Fwd: BUG: when performing a checkout use the cased url as in the
> download URL
>
>
> When performing a checkout use the cased url as in t
As per Ulrich Eckhardt's email recommendation I have forwarded this
email (bug) to svn.
-- Forwarded message --
From: dave b
Date: 21 July 2010 17:19
Subject: BUG: when performing a checkout use the cased url as in the
download URL
To: us...@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
When performi
Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote on Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 17:16:10 +0530:
> I'm still writing a unittest in Python, although I'm still trying to figure
> out how to test it without using that ugly awk query to compare it against
> the `svnadmin dump` output.
Have a look at svnsync_tests.py and svntest/ve
Hi Stefan,
It's been a while, and I've fixed most of the issues that you pointed
out intermittently over the last few days. I'm still writing a
unittest in Python, although I'm still trying to figure out how to
test it without using that ugly awk query to compare it against the
`svnadmin dump` out
19 matches
Mail list logo
