Re: RFC: How should revert handle copied/added items?

2010-08-09 Thread Greg Stein
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 12:54, Paul Burba wrote: > We have several issues related to the question of how revert should > handle locally added or copied items: > > 'svn revert of svn move' > http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=876 > > 'svn revert should provide a way to delete copied

Re: RFC: How should revert handle copied/added items?

2010-08-09 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Paul Burba] > With only one exception that I know of[1], revert leaves local > additions of every stripe as unversioned. My first question is > simple: > > "Do we consider this the correct behavior?" > > A) "Yes! svn revert only reverts the scheduled addition, but leaves > the item behind as u

RE: Bikeshed: configuration override order

2010-08-09 Thread Bob Archer
> Stefan Küng wrote on Sat, Aug 07, 2010 at 12:59:26 +0200: > > On 07.08.2010 12:44, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > >> If corporations want to have configuration override, fine. > >> > >> But I want a way to disable that completely. I don't > necessarily want to > >> allow a random sourceforge repository

Re: How to preserve err->apr_err error codes over the wire in ra_dav?

2010-08-09 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Per discussion with cmpilato on IRC, the current plan is to stow the error chain under the element --- which is what the 207 Multi-Status response currently contains, and which currently contains only the error message (but not its numeric code). Daniel (going to sleep, so short) Daniel Shahaf

Re: GSoC coming to an end

2010-08-09 Thread Branko Čibej
On 09.08.2010 10:30, Daniel Näslund wrote: > Hi! > > The "soft" deadline for GSoC 2010 is today. Not much time left then... > > What has been accomplished: > > * A parseable diff format for properties. > * svn patch can apply properties > * We have Python tests for applying properties. > * svn dif

Re: svn_wc_translated_file3

2010-08-09 Thread Greg Stein
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 13:54, Hyrum K. Wright wrote: > On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Hyrum K. Wright > wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Stefan Küng wrote: >... >>> * new API svn_wc_translated_file3(): >>>  svn_client_translated_file(const char ** resultfile, >>>      svn_boolean_t *

Re: RFC: WCNG and Issue #2915: Merge tracking and missing subtrees due to non-svn removal

2010-08-09 Thread Paul Burba
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 6:51 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Paul Burba wrote on Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 10:30:50 -0400: >> As described in issue #2915, in 1.6 when a merge target is a missing >> subtree due to its removal by non-svn means, we try to record >> mergeinfo such that the missing subtree doesn'

RE: svn commit: r983766 - /subversion/branches/performance/subversion/libsvn_client/export.c

2010-08-09 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:d...@daniel.shahaf.name] > Sent: maandag 9 augustus 2010 20:45 > To: dev@subversion.apache.org > Cc: stef...@apache.org > Subject: Re: svn commit: r983766 - > /subversion/branches/performance/subversion/libsvn_client/export.c > > stef...

RE: svn commit: r983766 - /subversion/branches/performance/subversion/libsvn_client/export.c

2010-08-09 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: hy...@hyrumwright.org [mailto:hy...@hyrumwright.org] On Behalf > Of Hyrum K. Wright > Sent: maandag 9 augustus 2010 20:42 > To: dev@subversion.apache.org > Cc: comm...@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Re: svn commit: r983766 - > /subversion/branches/performanc

Re: svn commit: r983766 - /subversion/branches/performance/subversion/libsvn_client/export.c

2010-08-09 Thread Daniel Shahaf
stef...@apache.org wrote on Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 18:33:53 -: > Author: stefan2 > Date: Mon Aug 9 18:33:53 2010 > New Revision: 983766 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=983766&view=rev > Log: > Fix the root cause of an assertion triggered by exporting KDE /trunk: > File names need to b

Re: svn commit: r983766 - /subversion/branches/performance/subversion/libsvn_client/export.c

2010-08-09 Thread Hyrum K. Wright
Should this fix be made on trunk? To make sure that bug fixes get the broadest coverage, we fix bugs on trunk, and then backport them to feature and/or release branches. It may seem like some additional overhead, since you've (currently) only got commit priviledges on the performance-improvement

Re: svn commit: r983764 - /subversion/branches/performance/subversion/libsvn_subr/dirent_uri.c

2010-08-09 Thread Daniel Shahaf
+1 to merge this to trunk. (Please specify "Approved by: danielsh" when doing so, since your commit access does not currently include /trunk. Thanks.) stef...@apache.org wrote on Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 18:27:49 -: > Author: stefan2 > Date: Mon Aug 9 18:27:49 2010 > New Revision: 983764 > > U

Re: svn commit: r983764 - /subversion/branches/performance/subversion/libsvn_subr/dirent_uri.c

2010-08-09 Thread Hyrum K. Wright
This fix should probably be made on trunk, yes? -Hyrum On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 1:27 PM, wrote: > Author: stefan2 > Date: Mon Aug  9 18:27:49 2010 > New Revision: 983764 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=983764&view=rev > Log: > Fix an obvious typo in the path validation code that is also

Re: svn_wc_translated_file3

2010-08-09 Thread Hyrum K. Wright
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Hyrum K. Wright wrote: > On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Stefan Küng wrote: >> On 09.08.2010 16:44, Hyrum K. Wright wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 7:46 AM, Julian Foad >>>  wrote: On Mon, 2010-08-09, Julian Foad wrote: > > On Mon, 2010-08

Re: svn_wc_translated_file3

2010-08-09 Thread Stefan Küng
On 09.08.2010 19:11, Hyrum K. Wright wrote: On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Stefan Küng wrote: On 09.08.2010 16:44, Hyrum K. Wright wrote: On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 7:46 AM, Julian Foad wrote: On Mon, 2010-08-09, Julian Foad wrote: On Mon, 2010-08-09, Bert Huijben wrote: Stefan Küng wro

Re: svn_wc_translated_file3

2010-08-09 Thread Hyrum K. Wright
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Stefan Küng wrote: > On 09.08.2010 16:44, Hyrum K. Wright wrote: >> >> On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 7:46 AM, Julian Foad >>  wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, 2010-08-09, Julian Foad wrote: On Mon, 2010-08-09, Bert Huijben wrote: > > Stefan Küng wrote: >>

RFC: How should revert handle copied/added items?

2010-08-09 Thread Paul Burba
We have several issues related to the question of how revert should handle locally added or copied items: 'svn revert of svn move' http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=876 'svn revert should provide a way to delete copied files' http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3

Re: svn_wc_translated_file3

2010-08-09 Thread Stefan Küng
On 09.08.2010 16:44, Hyrum K. Wright wrote: On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 7:46 AM, Julian Foad wrote: On Mon, 2010-08-09, Julian Foad wrote: On Mon, 2010-08-09, Bert Huijben wrote: Stefan Küng wrote: This leads me to another request: would it be possible to 'un-deprecate' the svn_wc_get_pristine_co

Re: svn_wc_translated_file3

2010-08-09 Thread Hyrum K. Wright
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 7:46 AM, Julian Foad wrote: > On Mon, 2010-08-09, Julian Foad wrote: >> On Mon, 2010-08-09, Bert Huijben wrote: >> > Stefan Küng wrote: >> > > This leads me to another request: would it be possible to 'un-deprecate' >> > > the svn_wc_get_pristine_copy_path() API? >> >> > One

RE: svn_wc_translated_file3

2010-08-09 Thread Julian Foad
On Mon, 2010-08-09, Julian Foad wrote: > On Mon, 2010-08-09, Bert Huijben wrote: > > Stefan Küng wrote: > > > This leads me to another request: would it be possible to 'un-deprecate' > > > the svn_wc_get_pristine_copy_path() API? > > > One of the ideas of WC-NG (which will most likely not be part

RE: svn_wc_translated_file3

2010-08-09 Thread Julian Foad
On Mon, 2010-08-09, Bert Huijben wrote: > Stefan Küng wrote: > > This leads me to another request: would it be possible to 'un-deprecate' > > the svn_wc_get_pristine_copy_path() API? > One of the ideas of WC-NG (which will most likely not be part of 1.7, but > can be added later without really upd

RE: svn_wc_translated_file3

2010-08-09 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Stefan Küng [mailto:tortoise...@gmail.com] > Sent: zaterdag 7 augustus 2010 13:07 > To: Daniel Shahaf > Cc: Subversion Development > Subject: Re: svn_wc_translated_file3 > > On 07.08.2010 12:52, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > What's the solution? > > I'm using svn

Re: svn_wc_translated_file3

2010-08-09 Thread Julian Foad
On Sat, 2010-08-07, Stefan Küng wrote: > On 07.08.2010 12:52, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > What's the solution? > > I'm using svn_wc_get_pristine_copy_path() and disable the deprecated > warnings for that API call. I won't get a translated file that way, but > most if not all UI diff tools have opti

Re: svn commit: r982057 - in /subversion/branches/performance/subversion/svnserve: main.c server.h

2010-08-09 Thread Stefan Fuhrmann
Johan Corveleyn wrote: On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 12:46 AM, wrote: Author: stefan2 Date: Tue Aug 3 22:46:10 2010 New Revision: 982057 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=982057&view=rev Log: Add "compression", "memory-cache-size" and "open-file-count" command line parameters to svnserve. Th

Re: svn commit: r982375 - in /subversion/branches/performance/subversion: include/svn_io.h libsvn_subr/stream.c

2010-08-09 Thread Stefan Fuhrmann
Bert Huijben wrote: [Repeating the first mail then... Thanks tele2 for breaking my e-mail for the second time this week :(] -Original Message- From: stef...@apache.org [mailto:stef...@apache.org] Sent: woensdag 4 augustus 2010 22:22 To: comm...@subversion.apache.org Subject: svn com

GSoC coming to an end

2010-08-09 Thread Daniel Näslund
Hi! The "soft" deadline for GSoC 2010 is today. Not much time left then... What has been accomplished: * A parseable diff format for properties. * svn patch can apply properties * We have Python tests for applying properties. * svn diff can create 'git diffs when passed a special flag. * C-unit