RE: svn diff - Is this behaviour expected?

> -Original Message- > From: Vincent Lefevre [mailto:vincent-...@vinc17.net] > Sent: zondag 15 augustus 2010 16:50 > To: dev@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Re: svn diff - Is this behaviour expected? > > On 2010-08-15 05:34:08 -0700, Bert Huijben wrote: > > > Conversely, when blah has b

RE: [WIP] Enable passing copyfrom information for the diff code when dealing with repository diffs.

> -Original Message- > From: Daniel Näslund [mailto:dan...@longitudo.com] > Sent: zondag 15 augustus 2010 12:27 > To: dev@subversion.apache.org > Subject: [WIP] Enable passing copyfrom information for the diff code when > dealing with repository diffs. > > Hi! > > Why doesn't svn_ra_do_

Re: svn diff - Is this behaviour expected?

On 2010-08-15 05:34:08 -0700, Bert Huijben wrote: > > Conversely, when blah has been added, but not committed, > > > > svn diff -rBASE blah > > > > gives a diff instead of an error (indeed an error is expected because > > b...@base doesn't exist, as this can been seen with "svn cat blah"). > >

Re: svn log --show-diff behavior

On Sunday, August 15, 2010 12:58:46 pm Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 11:47:52AM -0700, Alexey Neyman wrote: > > On Saturday, August 14, 2010 04:31:44 am Stefan Sperling wrote: > > > > Judging from the commit message, this option should mimic 'git log > > > > -p' behavior, but git

Re: svn commit: r985487 - in /subversion/branches/performance/subversion: include/svn_io.h libsvn_subr/io.c libsvn_subr/stream.c

stef...@apache.org wrote on Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 13:20:22 -: > Author: stefan2 > Date: Sat Aug 14 13:20:22 2010 > New Revision: 985487 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=985487&view=rev > Log: > APR file I/O is a high frequency operation as the respective streams directly > map their r

Re: [WIP] Enable passing copyfrom information for the diff code when dealing with repository diffs.

On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 09:27:22PM +0200, Daniel Näslund wrote: > Hi! > > Why doesn't svn_ra_do_diff3() request that the repository sends copyfrom > args? The best explanation I've found is this commit message: > > > r866577

Re: svn diff - Is this behaviour expected?

On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 04:05:17AM +0100, chr...@lavabit.com wrote: > Hello, > > I'm running 'svn diff ...' from my application. > I want to make it work with filenames that contain '@'. > However, I'm finding, what appear to be, inconsistencies in its > behaviour. > > For testing I have a workin

Re: [WIP] Enable passing copyfrom information for the diff code when dealing with repository diffs.

Daniel Näslund wrote on Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 21:27:22 +0200: > Index: subversion/include/svn_ra.h > === > --- subversion/include/svn_ra.h (revision 985618) > +++ subversion/include/svn_ra.h (arbetskopia) > @@ -1291,9 +1291,

Re: svn log --show-diff behavior

On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 11:47:52AM -0700, Alexey Neyman wrote: > On Saturday, August 14, 2010 04:31:44 am Stefan Sperling wrote: > > > Judging from the commit message, this option should mimic 'git log -p' > > > behavior, but git does not dump the whole diff by default when -p is > > > specified. I

[WIP] Enable passing copyfrom information for the diff code when dealing with repository diffs.

Hi! Why doesn't svn_ra_do_diff3() request that the repository sends copyfrom args? The best explanation I've found is this commit message: r866577 | sussman | 2007-09-10 06:56:55 +0200 (mån, 10 sep 2007) | 87 lines Send cop

Re: svn commit: r985514 - in /subversion/branches/performance/subversion: include/svn_io.h libsvn_subr/stream.c libsvn_subr/subst.c

Daniel Näslund > wrote: On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 03:46:13PM -, stefan2_at_apache.org wrote: /> Author:

RE: svn diff - Is this behaviour expected?

> -Original Message- > From: Vincent Lefevre [mailto:vincent-...@vinc17.net] > Sent: zaterdag 14 augustus 2010 15:01 > To: dev@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Re: svn diff - Is this behaviour expected? > > On 2010-08-14 04:05:17 +0100, chr...@lavabit.com wrote: > > Is this expected/desi

Re: svn commit: r983474 - /subversion/branches/performance/subversion/libsvn_fs_fs/caching.c

Philip Martin wrote: stef...@apache.org writes: Author: stefan2 Date: Sun Aug 8 19:41:11 2010 New Revision: 983474 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=983474&view=rev Log: Memcached is often slower than a single file access. Doesn't that depend on the type of filesystem used and t