Justin Erenkrantz wrote on Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 14:23:15 -0700:
> On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Daniel Shahaf
> wrote:
> > Greg Stein wrote on Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 14:11:21 -0400:
> >> I wish you wouldn't change the subject line so often.
> >
> > Why not? It has proper References: and In-Rep
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 7:25 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> I also added an API to serf to facilitate runtime version checks (ie.
> hopefully before a call to a bogus signature is performed). But that
> call is only in later versions :-P
Yup - I noticed that when I added the minimum version auto-fu chec
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 17:30, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 1:02 PM, Lieven Govaerts wrote:
>> Hey Justin,
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 4:30 AM, wrote:
>>> Author: jerenkrantz
>>> Date: Sat Aug 21 02:30:31 2010
>>> New Revision: 987689
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/v
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 17:23, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Daniel Shahaf
> wrote:
>> Greg Stein wrote on Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 14:11:21 -0400:
>>> I wish you wouldn't change the subject line so often.
>>
>> Why not? It has proper References: and In-Reply-To:. Sh
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Greg Stein wrote on Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 14:11:21 -0400:
>> I wish you wouldn't change the subject line so often.
>
> Why not? It has proper References: and In-Reply-To:. Should be enough
> for threading to work, no?
Not with Gmail - chan
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 1:02 PM, Lieven Govaerts wrote:
> Hey Justin,
>
> On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 4:30 AM, wrote:
>> Author: jerenkrantz
>> Date: Sat Aug 21 02:30:31 2010
>> New Revision: 987689
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=987689&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Propose r879757 & r880320 for
Hey Justin,
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 4:30 AM, wrote:
> Author: jerenkrantz
> Date: Sat Aug 21 02:30:31 2010
> New Revision: 987689
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=987689&view=rev
> Log:
> Propose r879757 & r880320 for backport to 1.6.x.
>
> Modified:
> subversion/branches/1.6.x/STATU
See r987210 on trunk.
stef...@apache.org wrote on Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 12:19:57 -:
> Author: stefan2
> Date: Sun Aug 22 12:19:57 2010
> New Revision: 987888
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=987888&view=rev
> Log:
> svn:ignore file generated by VisualStudio 2010
>
> * /
> ignore ip
stef...@apache.org wrote on Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 11:43:48 -:
> Author: stefan2
> Date: Sun Aug 22 11:43:47 2010
> New Revision: 987872
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=987872&view=rev
> Log:
> Build file generation scripts don't handle uppercase identifiers.
> Therefore, we can't have
Julian Foad wrote on Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 18:12:29 +0100:
> On Fri, 2010-08-20, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > I arrived at these docstrings by reverse-engineering the implementation
> > and some guesses. Could someone confirm my understanding?
> >
> > [[[
> > * subversion/libsvn_ra_neon/util.c
> > (
Greg Stein wrote on Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 14:11:21 -0400:
> I wish you wouldn't change the subject line so often.
Why not? It has proper References: and In-Reply-To:. Should be enough
for threading to work, no?
Stefan Sperling wrote on Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 13:44:07 +0200:
> On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 11:37:38AM -, stef...@apache.org wrote:
> > + apr_size_t entries_len = count * sizeof(svn_fs_dirent_t*[1]);
>
So how would this be parsed? Is it parsed as
sizeof( (type *) [1] )
?
> Do you rea
Stefan, you did mention "Patch by" for Johan's patches which you
committed, did you intend to mention "Found by" or "Suggested by" for
the other two (quoted below)?
http://subversion.apache.org/docs/community-guide/conventions.html#crediting
Thanks,
Daniel
Stefan Fuhrmann wrote on Sun, Aug 22,
On 18.08.2010 00:59, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> Hi devs,
>
> While "Looking to improve performance of svn annotate" [1], I found
> that the current blame algorithm is mainly client-side bound, and that
> most of its time is spent on "svn diff" (calls to svn_diff_file_diff_2
> from add_file_blame in b
Johan Corveleyn wrote:
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 9:14 PM, Stefan Fuhrmann
wrote:
Hi @all,
I just finished my porting work; the performance branch
is now fully synchronized with my prototype code.
From my point of view, review can start now.
According to my measurements, the code is now faste
Johan Corveleyn wrote:
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 1:11 AM, wrote:
Author: stefan2
Date: Tue Aug 17 23:11:13 2010
New Revision: 986521
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=986521&view=rev
Log:
Change serialized representation of pointers: instead of storing offsets
relative to the whole buffe
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 01:44:07PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 11:37:38AM -, stef...@apache.org wrote:
> > Author: stefan2
> > Date: Sun Aug 22 11:37:38 2010
> > New Revision: 987869
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=987869&view=rev
> > Log:
> > Fix Visu
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 11:37:38AM -, stef...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: stefan2
> Date: Sun Aug 22 11:37:38 2010
> New Revision: 987869
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=987869&view=rev
> Log:
> Fix VisualStudio build: memory size calculation for variable size
> arrays is not portab
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 5:46 PM, Hyrum K. Wright
wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 7:35 AM, C. Michael Pilato
> wrote:
>> See http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3693
>>
>> Would it make sense for a multi-target update (such as 'svn update *') to
>> print headers for each of its t
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 12:56:23PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 12:17:41PM +0700, Victor Sudakov wrote:
> > Colleagues, I understand that you are expecting a patch. I am sorry, I
> > am a systems administrator and not a programmer, my code writing
> > ability does not go
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 12:17:41PM +0700, Victor Sudakov wrote:
> Colleagues, I understand that you are expecting a patch. I am sorry, I
> am a systems administrator and not a programmer, my code writing
> ability does not go beyond scripting.
Can you try this patch and let me know if it works?
I
21 matches
Mail list logo
