On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 3:03 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> On 12/15/2010 03:00 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>> On 12/15/2010 02:58 PM, Philip Martin wrote:
>>> "C. Michael Pilato" writes:
>>>
On 12/15/2010 02:11 PM, Philip Martin wrote:
> "C. Michael Pilato" writes:
>
>> Try r1
On 12/15/2010 03:00 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> On 12/15/2010 02:58 PM, Philip Martin wrote:
>> "C. Michael Pilato" writes:
>>
>>> On 12/15/2010 02:11 PM, Philip Martin wrote:
"C. Michael Pilato" writes:
> Try r1049668 -- see if stuff still passes for you in your default
> co
On 12/15/2010 02:58 PM, Philip Martin wrote:
> "C. Michael Pilato" writes:
>
>> On 12/15/2010 02:11 PM, Philip Martin wrote:
>>> "C. Michael Pilato" writes:
>>>
Try r1049668 -- see if stuff still passes for you in your default
configuration.
>>>
>>> Yes, it does.
>>
>> Cool. Thanks.
>
"C. Michael Pilato" writes:
> On 12/15/2010 02:11 PM, Philip Martin wrote:
>> "C. Michael Pilato" writes:
>>
>>> Try r1049668 -- see if stuff still passes for you in your default
>>> configuration.
>>
>> Yes, it does.
>
> Cool. Thanks.
It seems to fail on Windows:
http://ci.apache.org/build
"C. Michael Pilato" writes:
> Try r1049668 -- see if stuff still passes for you in your default
> configuration.
Yes, it does.
--
Philip
On 12/15/2010 08:37 AM, Prabhu Gnana Sundar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This patch makes the "svnrdump's" help to display the
> subcommand-specific documentation.
> ( similar to "svn", "svnlook", "svnadmin" ...)
>
> Previously, "svnrdump dump --help" does *not* display the
> help-documentation correspondin
On 12/15/2010 02:11 PM, Philip Martin wrote:
> "C. Michael Pilato" writes:
>
>> Try r1049668 -- see if stuff still passes for you in your default
>> configuration.
>
> Yes, it does.
Cool. Thanks.
--
C. Michael Pilato
CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Development On Demand
On 12/15/2010 02:02 PM, Philip Martin wrote:
> If I do
>
> pushd subversion/tests/cmdline
> svnadmin create repo
> ../../svn/svn co file://`pwd`/repo wc
> mv wc/.svn .
> popd
>
> then stat_tests.py 19 starts to FAIL. So it's running inside a 1.7 wc
> that causes the problem.
Try r1049668 -- see
"C. Michael Pilato" writes:
> On 12/15/2010 12:26 PM, Philip Martin wrote:
>> Noorul Islam K M writes:
>>
My work-in-progress *shouldn't* have any relevance here, so I'm assuming
that others are seeing this problem, too. Can someone confirm?
>>>
>>> I confirm that it is failing for m
On 12/15/2010 12:35 PM, Noorul Islam K M wrote:
> "C. Michael Pilato" writes:
>> And I'm building/running inside the source dir. That might explain the
>> difference.
>
> Is it not because of 1045385?
Yes, it is.
--
C. Michael Pilato
CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Develop
Martin Furter writes:
> Doing some more testing I found another out that non-existing
> libraries have to be removed from LD_PRELOAD.
Does this interact with --enable-runtime-module-search? That's the
switch that causes Subversion to load RA/FS modules at runtime rather
than linking them to the
Here's the latest patch. I ran the commit tests and svnlook tests and they
passed. There seem to not be any other tests for hooks.
- Martin
[[[
Use svn_io_start_cmd2 in run_hook_cmd.
* subversion/libsvn_repos/hooks.c
(run_hook_cmd): Use svn_io_start_cmd2.
]]]Index: subversion/libsvn_repos
Doing some more testing I found another out that non-existing libraries
have to be removed from LD_PRELOAD.
So here's a new patch.
- Martin
On Wed, 15 Dec 2010, Martin Furter wrote:
Here is version 2 of the patch.
On Tue, 14 Dec 2010, Philip Martin wrote:
Martin Furter writes:
The g
"C. Michael Pilato" writes:
> On 12/15/2010 12:26 PM, Philip Martin wrote:
>
>> Noorul Islam K M writes:
>>
My work-in-progress *shouldn't* have any relevance here, so I'm assuming
that others are seeing this problem, too. Can someone confirm?
>>>
>>> I confirm that it is failing for
On 12/15/2010 12:26 PM, Philip Martin wrote:
> Noorul Islam K M writes:
>
>>> My work-in-progress *shouldn't* have any relevance here, so I'm assuming
>>> that others are seeing this problem, too. Can someone confirm?
>>
>> I confirm that it is failing for me also. I do not have any local
>> cha
Noorul Islam K M writes:
>> My work-in-progress *shouldn't* have any relevance here, so I'm assuming
>> that others are seeing this problem, too. Can someone confirm?
>
> I confirm that it is failing for me also. I do not have any local
> changes.
Passes for me. I'm building/running the tests
Philip Martin writes:
>> stat_tests.py 19 is a PASS for me, unmodified r11049592.
>
> s/r11049578/r1049592/
Gah! I mean r1049592.
--
Philip
Philip Martin writes:
> "C. Michael Pilato" writes:
>
>> I'm seeing stat_tests.py 19 failing for what looks like a difference of
>> abspath/relpath in the output:
>
> stat_tests.py 19 is a PASS for me, unmodified r11049592.
s/r11049578/r1049592/
--
Philip
"C. Michael Pilato" writes:
> I'm seeing stat_tests.py 19 failing for what looks like a difference of
> abspath/relpath in the output:
stat_tests.py 19 is a PASS for me, unmodified r11049592.
--
Philip
"C. Michael Pilato" writes:
> I'm seeing stat_tests.py 19 failing for what looks like a difference of
> abspath/relpath in the output:
>
> -svn: warning:
> '/home/cmpilato/projects/subversion/trunk/subversion/tests/cmdline/svn-test-work/local_tmp/repos'
> is not a working copy
> -svn: warning:
>
I'm seeing stat_tests.py 19 failing for what looks like a difference of
abspath/relpath in the output:
-svn: warning:
'/home/cmpilato/projects/subversion/trunk/subversion/tests/cmdline/svn-test-work/local_tmp/repos'
is not a working copy
-svn: warning:
'/home/cmpilato/projects/subversion/trunk/sub
On Wed, 2010-12-15, Noorul Islam K M wrote:
> Julian Foad writes:
>
> > Noorul Islam K M wrote:
> >
> >> Julian Foad writes:
> >> > Thank you for the updated patch. Even though this is a very
> >> > simple-looking patch, I need a bit more information to help me review
> >> > it.
> >> >
> >> > D
"C. Michael Pilato" writes:
> On 12/10/2010 11:31 AM, Noorul Islam K M wrote:
>
>> Noorul Islam K M writes:
>>
>>> Attached is the patch.
>
> FIXED:
>Sendingtools/dev/svn-dev.el
>Transmitting file data .
>Committed revision 1049557.
Thank You!
- Noorul
Hi,
I was looking through the subversion/libsvn_wc/update_editor.c and
noticed that there was a redundant member (added_with_history) in the
file baton structure. This is not being set anywhere which results in
some unreachable code. I have removed the member and the corresponding
unreachable
On 12/14/2010 11:28 PM, Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
> I'd like to move everything in our contrib/ directory to the new
> Apache Extras hosting.
+`find trunk/contrib | wc -l`.
--
C. Michael Pilato
CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Development On Demand
signature.asc
Description: O
On 12/10/2010 11:31 AM, Noorul Islam K M wrote:
> Noorul Islam K M writes:
>
>> Attached is the patch.
FIXED:
Sendingtools/dev/svn-dev.el
Transmitting file data .
Committed revision 1049557.
--
C. Michael Pilato
CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Development O
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 8:02 AM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> On 12/14/2010 11:28 PM, Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
>> I'd like to move everything in our contrib/ directory to the new
>> Apache Extras hosting.
>
> +`find trunk/contrib | wc -l`.
$ find contrib | wc -l
592
$ find contrib | grep -v '.sv
On 12/15/2010 04:32 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> Are the sig* variants available on all platforms? I don't recall seeing
> them in the C90 stdlib.
`man setjmp` tells me:
C89, C99, and POSIX.1-2001 specify setjmp(). POSIX.1-2001 specifies
sigsetjmp().
--
C. Michael Pilato
CollabNet <> www.col
Hi,
This patch makes the "svnrdump's" help to display the
subcommand-specific documentation.
( similar to "svn", "svnlook", "svnadmin" ...)
Previously, "svnrdump dump --help" does *not* display the
help-documentation corresponding to "dump", but "svnrdump help dump" did
as expected.
Meanwhile,
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 3:32 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 15.12.2010 06:17, Blair Zajac wrote:
>> On 12/14/10 8:21 PM, hwri...@apache.org wrote:
>>> Author: hwright
>>> Date: Wed Dec 15 04:21:23 2010
>>> New Revision: 1049414
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1049414&view=rev
>>> Log:
On Fri, 2010-12-10 at 22:01 +0530, Noorul Islam K M wrote:
> Noorul Islam K M writes:
>
> > Attached is the patch.
> >
> > Thanks and Regards
> > Noorul
> >
> > Index: tools/dev/svn-dev.el
> > ===
> > --- tools/dev/svn-dev.el(rev
Here is version 2 of the patch.
On Tue, 14 Dec 2010, Philip Martin wrote:
Martin Furter writes:
The generated script then has to be included into the tarball. I
believe to remember that there's a script which creates the
tarball. Can anyone give me a pointer where I can find it?
tools/dis
> -Original Message-
> From: Johan Corveleyn [mailto:jcor...@gmail.com]
> Sent: woensdag 15 december 2010 11:30
> To: Branko Čibej
> Cc: dev@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [RFC] diff-optimizations-bytes branch: avoiding function
> call overhead (?)
>
> It was a Windows build (x86)
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 11:50 AM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>> Also, I did my measurements with a blame operation on this very large
>> file, which has ~2500 revisions. So that's 2500 diffs of a ~1,5 Mb
>> file, with say on average 1 Mb of i
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 11:50 AM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 2:30 AM, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
>> On 14.12.2010 23:35, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>
>> Hi Johan ;)
>
> Hi Stefan, thanks for the input :). I suspected that you might have
> some ideas about this ...
>
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 2:30 AM, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
> On 14.12.2010 23:35, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>
> Hi Johan ;)
Hi Stefan, thanks for the input :). I suspected that you might have
some ideas about this ...
>> On the diff-optimizations-bytes branch, in diff_file.c, there are t
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 15.12.2010 02:30, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
>> On 14.12.2010 23:35, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>>> Some considerations:
>>> - Maybe I can use APR_INLINE, with similar results?
>>>
>>> - Maybe I can put just the "critical section" into a macro (th
On 15.12.2010 02:30, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
On 14.12.2010 23:35, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
Thoughts?
Two things you might try:
* introduce a local variable for afile[i]
* replace the for() loop with two nested ones, keeping
calls to other functions out of the hot spot:
for (i=0; i < file_len;)
On 15.12.2010 06:17, Blair Zajac wrote:
> On 12/14/10 8:21 PM, hwri...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: hwright
>> Date: Wed Dec 15 04:21:23 2010
>> New Revision: 1049414
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1049414&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Allow tests which cause segfaults to not disrupt the other t
On 15.12.2010 02:30, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
> On 14.12.2010 23:35, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>> Some considerations:
>> - Maybe I can use APR_INLINE, with similar results?
>>
>> - Maybe I can put just the "critical section" into a macro (the curp++
>> / curp-- part), and call a function when a chunk b
On 15.12.2010 07:05, Blair Zajac wrote:
On 12/14/10 8:28 PM, Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
I'd like to move everything in our contrib/ directory to the new
Apache Extras hosting.
As many might know, I've been on a personal crusade to stop the
Subversion project from being a source code hosting system.
41 matches
Mail list logo
