On Tuesday 15 March 2011 08:34 PM, Julian Foad wrote:
On Wed, 2011-03-02, Arwin Arni wrote:
In my effort to understand the delta editor API, I took it upon myself
to try and implement the --dry-run flag for "svn update".
http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2491
Hi Arwin. Ka
I wonder, why this patch was not considered for fixing issue 3826. I
could see a fix 1081799 which I see very similar to what I have
done. Did I miss anything here?
Thanks and Regards
Noorul
--- Begin Message ---
Julian Foad writes:
> On Thu, 2011-03-03 at 22:48 +0530, Noorul Islam K M wrote:
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 6:47 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 10:43:46PM -0500, Greg Stein wrote:
>>> 2011/3/11 Branko Čibej :
>>> >...
>>> > For the second task, I think the first order of business is to change
>>> > t
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 22:38, John Beranek wrote:
> On 14/03/2011 19:52, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 22:47, John Beranek wrote:
>>> On 14/03/2011 19:45, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 20:46, John Beranek wrote:
> On 14/03/11 17:14, Philip Martin wrote:
>>>
Greg Stein writes:
> Why can't we simply put restrictions on those callbacks? I'm unclear
> on this part.
We seem to be unsure if such a restriction is a good idea.
Suppose a client calls proplist, what can it do when it sees a property
of interest? Can it delete the property? Modify the valu
Branko Čibej writes:
> On 15.03.2011 15:34, Philip Martin wrote:
>> So with the temporary table approach the callback really has to use a
>> separate database connection to read/write the database from within the
>> callback.
>>
>> However I think that is also the case if we were to avoid the tab
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 10:34, Philip Martin wrote:
>...
> So with the temporary table approach the callback really has to use a
> separate database connection to read/write the database from within the
> callback.
>
> However I think that is also the case if we were to avoid the table and
> simpl
On 14/03/2011 19:52, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 22:47, John Beranek wrote:
>> On 14/03/2011 19:45, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 20:46, John Beranek wrote:
On 14/03/11 17:14, Philip Martin wrote:
> Ivan Zhakov writes:
>
>> I investigated your p
phi...@apache.org writes:
> Author: philip
> Date: Tue Mar 15 18:33:52 2011
> New Revision: 1081892
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1081892&view=rev
> Log:
> Make revert change file permissions on the basis of the current magic
> properties and the current permissions, rather than on any
On 15.03.2011 15:34, Philip Martin wrote:
> Philip Martin writes:
>
>> Branko Čibej writes:
>>
>>> The temporary table is:
>>>
>>> * in a different database, so the read lock on it does not affect
>>> the main wc-db;
>>> * per-connection, so even the same process using a different
>
On Wed, 2011-03-02, Arwin Arni wrote:
> In my effort to understand the delta editor API, I took it upon myself
> to try and implement the --dry-run flag for "svn update".
> http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2491
Hi Arwin. Kamesh asked for technical feedback about this patch s
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 9:56 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Paul Burba wrote on Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 09:38:31 -0400:
>> On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 12:24 AM, Daniel Shahaf
>> wrote:
>> > pbu...@apache.org wrote on Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 15:46:10 -:
>> >> +++ subversion/trunk/subversion/tests/cmdline/l
Philip Martin writes:
> Branko Čibej writes:
>
>> The temporary table is:
>>
>> * in a different database, so the read lock on it does not affect
>> the main wc-db;
>> * per-connection, so even the same process using a different
>> database connection will not even see that t
Branko Čibej writes:
> The temporary table is:
>
> * in a different database, so the read lock on it does not affect
> the main wc-db;
> * per-connection, so even the same process using a different
> database connection will not even see that temporary table.
OK, so the proce
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 12:52:42PM +, Philip Martin wrote:
> Yes, by the time we invoke the callbacks we have a read-lock. If we
> simply ran a single transaction and made callbacks within the
> transaction then it would have the same effect. I don't see what the
> temporary table achieves.
> -Original Message-
> From: Philip Martin [mailto:philip.mar...@wandisco.com]
> Sent: dinsdag 15 maart 2011 14:52
> To: C. Michael Pilato
> Cc: Subversion Development
> Subject: Re: Race condition in libsvn_client code?
>
> "C. Michael Pilato" writes:
>
> > [Tweaking Subject: for (hop
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 16:49, Julian Foad wrote:
> Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 21:13, Julian Foad wrote:
>> > Bert Huijben wrote:
>> >> > -Original Message-
>> >> > From: Julian Foad [mailto:julian.f...@wandisco.com]
>> >> >
>> >> > I'm not clear exactly what problem we
Paul Burba wrote on Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 09:38:31 -0400:
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 12:24 AM, Daniel Shahaf
> wrote:
> > pbu...@apache.org wrote on Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 15:46:10 -:
> >> +++ subversion/trunk/subversion/tests/cmdline/log_tests.py Tue Mar 8
> >> 15:46:09 2011
> >> @@ -1148,9 +1
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:d...@daniel.shahaf.name]
> Sent: dinsdag 15 maart 2011 5:34
> To: dev@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: svn commit: r1079508 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion:
> include/svn_client.h include/svn_wc.h libsvn_client/commit_util.c
> libsv
"C. Michael Pilato" writes:
> [Tweaking Subject: for (hopefully) additional visibility.]
>
> On 03/15/2011 09:15 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>> C. Michael Pilato wrote on Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 09:05:56 -0400:
>>> On 03/15/2011 12:34 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
cmpil...@apache.org wrote on Tue, Mar
On 15.03.2011 11:26, Philip Martin wrote:
> Branko Čibej writes:
>
>> The restriction that you may not invoke a callback from within a sqlite
>> transaction remains. That's what the temporary results tables are for --
>> they live outside transactions on the main wc-db.
> I don't understand the te
Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 21:13, Julian Foad wrote:
> > Bert Huijben wrote:
> >> > -Original Message-
> >> > From: Julian Foad [mailto:julian.f...@wandisco.com]
> >> >
> >> > I'm not clear exactly what problem we would avoid by eliminating the
> >> > "select a unique name
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 12:24 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> pbu...@apache.org wrote on Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 15:46:10 -:
>> Author: pburba
>> Date: Tue Mar 8 15:46:09 2011
>> New Revision: 1079400
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1079400&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Follow-up to rr1076726, fix
[Tweaking Subject: for (hopefully) additional visibility.]
On 03/15/2011 09:15 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> C. Michael Pilato wrote on Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 09:05:56 -0400:
>> On 03/15/2011 12:34 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>>> cmpil...@apache.org wrote on Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 20:05:51 -:
Autho
C. Michael Pilato wrote on Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 09:05:56 -0400:
> On 03/15/2011 12:34 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > cmpil...@apache.org wrote on Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 20:05:51 -:
> >> Author: cmpilato
> >> Date: Tue Mar 8 20:05:50 2011
> >> New Revision: 1079508
>
> [...]
>
> >> svn_client_co
On 03/15/2011 12:34 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> cmpil...@apache.org wrote on Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 20:05:51 -:
>> Author: cmpilato
>> Date: Tue Mar 8 20:05:50 2011
>> New Revision: 1079508
[...]
>> svn_client_commit4(svn_commit_info_t **commit_info_p,
>> const apr_array_he
On 03/15/2011 12:43 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> s...@apache.org wrote on Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 22:51:52 -:
>> Author: stsp
>> Date: Tue Mar 8 22:51:51 2011
>> New Revision: 1079592
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1079592&view=rev
>> Log:
>> * subversion/svn/main.c
>> (svn_cl__cmd_t
Stefan Sperling writes:
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 10:26:15AM +, Philip Martin wrote:
>> Branko Čibej writes:
>>
>> > The restriction that you may not invoke a callback from within a sqlite
>> > transaction remains. That's what the temporary results tables are for --
>> > they live outside t
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 21:13, Julian Foad wrote:
> Bert Huijben wrote:
>> > -Original Message-
>> > From: Julian Foad [mailto:julian.f...@wandisco.com]
>> >
>> > I'm not clear exactly what problem we would avoid by eliminating the
>> > "select a unique name" step of this process. Is it wh
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 10:26:15AM +, Philip Martin wrote:
> Branko Čibej writes:
>
> > The restriction that you may not invoke a callback from within a sqlite
> > transaction remains. That's what the temporary results tables are for --
> > they live outside transactions on the main wc-db.
>
Ignore this thread; as Philip says it works fine with SVN_DBG_OUTPUT=stderr.
Thanks.
Philip Martin wrote on Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 09:35:02 +:
> Daniel Shahaf writes:
>
> > % $svnversion `.svn`
> > 1081669M
> > % $svn di `.svn`
> > Index: subversion/libsvn_fs_fs/fs_fs.c
> > ==
Branko Čibej writes:
> The restriction that you may not invoke a callback from within a sqlite
> transaction remains. That's what the temporary results tables are for --
> they live outside transactions on the main wc-db.
I don't understand the temporary table approach. Taking the
temp__node_pr
Philip Martin writes:
> Update with no changes on NFS disk:
>
> 1.6: 2s
> 1.7: 50s
With the recent bump-post-update changes that 50s has become 23s.
--
Philip
On 03/14/2011 08:18 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 02:24:58PM -, kame...@apache.org wrote:
Author: kameshj
Date: Mon Mar 14 14:24:58 2011
New Revision: 1081390
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1081390&view=rev
Log:
Adds an XFail test to catch regression created by r
Daniel Shahaf writes:
> % $svnversion `.svn`
> 1081669M
> % $svn di `.svn`
> Index: subversion/libsvn_fs_fs/fs_fs.c
> ===
> --- subversion/libsvn_fs_fs/fs_fs.c (revision 1081669)
> +++ subversion/libsvn_fs_fs/fs_fs.c (working cop
35 matches
Mail list logo
