On 04/12/2011 05:11 PM, arfre...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: arfrever
> Date: Tue Apr 12 21:11:46 2011
> New Revision: 1091573
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1091573&view=rev
> Log:
> Followup to r1090784:
>
> * build.conf
> (libsvn_ra.libs): Add libsvn_fs_util.
Whoa. This doesn't
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
>...
>> >> > The whole idea behind static statements was to avoid SQL injection
>> >> > attacks.
>> >> > Allowing the *code* to construct statements opens us up.
>> >> >
>> >> > This is Not Good.
>> >>
>> >> This is still a prepared statement, ar
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 9:32 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>> Some thoughts:
>>
>> - There is only a problem if the dst_path gets case-normalized to one
>> of the source paths. Otherwise, the case-normalization really does
>> need to happen.
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 13:34, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> On 04/12/2011 01:08 PM, Philip Martin wrote:
>> Greg Stein writes:
>>
+ * If the text is unmodified and a write-lock is held this function
+ * will repair "broken" timestamps and filesizes.
>>>
>>> I don't understand what is repa
On 04/12/2011 01:08 PM, Philip Martin wrote:
> Greg Stein writes:
>
>>> + * If the text is unmodified and a write-lock is held this function
>>> + * will repair "broken" timestamps and filesizes.
>>
>> I don't understand what is repaired. The database, or the file. If the file,
>> then how do we
Greg Stein writes:
>> + * If the text is unmodified and a write-lock is held this function
>> + * will repair "broken" timestamps and filesizes.
>
> I don't understand what is repaired. The database, or the file. If the file,
> then how do we repair its filesize?
>
> This notion of "repair" is eq
rhuij...@apache.org writes:
> Author: rhuijben
> Date: Tue Apr 12 15:36:19 2011
> New Revision: 1091474
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1091474&view=rev
> Log:
> Another small step in cleaning up the commit harvester: Directly obtain
> lock tokens for nodes, instead of using a separate d
On Apr 12, 2011 12:43 PM, wrote:
>
> Author: philip
> Date: Tue Apr 12 16:43:23 2011
> New Revision: 1091495
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1091495&view=rev
> Log:
> Document timestamp repair function and use it during post-commit.
>
> * subversion/libsvn_wc/wc.h
> (svn_wc__internal_fi
On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 11:08 -0400, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> On 04/07/2011 08:49 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > C. Michael Pilato wrote on Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 11:19:48 -0400:
> >> "Remove temp APIs": I would put this at "nice to have". These APIs are
> >> private, so what's the penalty if they wi
On Apr 12, 2011 9:27 AM, "Hyrum K Wright" wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 2:12 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
> >
> > On Apr 11, 2011 10:58 PM, "Hyrum K Wright"
wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 9:41 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> >> > Woah. When did svn_sqlite__prepare arrive?
> >>
> >> $ svnd blame
When it comes down to it, a single voice *can* veto a technical choice. We
strive very hard to avoid that because of the many anti-social a specs, but
the point still holds true.
I have not seen anything yet that makes me go "oh, that should work great".
Instead, I see a direction in our code that
Hi Bert. A question about the "server handles [depth] filtering"
flag...
On Mon, 2011-04-11, rhuij...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: rhuijben
> Date: Mon Apr 11 19:58:27 2011
> New Revision: 1091187
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1091187&view=rev
> Log:
> Update the svn_wc_get_update_edi
On 04/12/2011 11:34 AM, phi...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: philip
> Date: Tue Apr 12 15:34:31 2011
> New Revision: 1091470
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1091470&view=rev
> Log:
> Start making timestamp repair work in WCNG; revert now works but
> not cleanup. Issue 3773.
Excellent!
A
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Bert Huijben wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Johan Corveleyn [mailto:jcor...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: dinsdag 12 april 2011 15:27
>> To: Hyrum Wright
>> Cc: C. Michael Pilato; Bert Huijben; Greg Stein; dev@subversion.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: svn comm
"Bert Huijben" writes:
> Ok, if I read this right you are assuming that that the switched path
> doesn't have local modifications.
No.
Here's an example:
svnadmin create repo
svn mkdir -mm --parents file://`pwd`/repo/A/B/C
svn cp -mm file://`pwd`/repo/A file://`pwd`/repo/X
svn co file://`pwd`/
> -Original Message-
> From: Johan Corveleyn [mailto:jcor...@gmail.com]
> Sent: dinsdag 12 april 2011 15:27
> To: Hyrum Wright
> Cc: C. Michael Pilato; Bert Huijben; Greg Stein; dev@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: svn commit: r1091262 -
> /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/wc_db.
On 04/12/2011 09:14 AM, Hyrum Wright wrote:
> I'll revert this work sometime today.
Just in case it wasn't clear: I'm not suggesting that you unconditionally
revert. Others in the thread are able to evaluate the technical merits of
the approach you took in ways that currently I cannot. I'm real
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 9:27 AM, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
>> Not sure. Maybe we can work through some ideas. But "we have no other
>> choice" is not a good enough reason to keep this. That is an even worse
>> slope to slide down. Doing things simply because they are "convenient".
>
> The general con
On 04/12/2011 06:32 AM, Philip Martin wrote:
> "Bert Huijben" writes:
>
>> I like to think of it this way (and the current WC-NG tree model agrees):
>>
>> A wc-wc copy is created from what is currently in your working copy and
>> copies are not affected by BASE operations; just like a non svn cop
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 2:12 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
>
> On Apr 11, 2011 10:58 PM, "Hyrum K Wright" wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 9:41 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
>> > Woah. When did svn_sqlite__prepare arrive?
>>
>> $ svnd blame subversion/libsvn_subr/sqlite.c | grep svn_sqlite__prepare
>> 87545
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Hyrum Wright wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 8:00 AM, C. Michael Pilato
> wrote:
>>> You are looking at changelists as a way to learn how to move operations into
>>> wc_db properly, but just like that temp table for notifications I don't see
>>> this as the way
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 8:00 AM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>> You are looking at changelists as a way to learn how to move operations into
>> wc_db properly, but just like that temp table for notifications I don't see
>> this as the way to go forward.
>>
>> I really don't see why users want to add
> You are looking at changelists as a way to learn how to move operations into
> wc_db properly, but just like that temp table for notifications I don't see
> this as the way to go forward.
>
> I really don't see why users want to add thousands of nodes to changelists
> while we still don't suppor
> -Original Message-
> From: Philip Martin [mailto:philip.mar...@wandisco.com]
> Sent: dinsdag 12 april 2011 12:32
> To: Bert Huijben
> Cc: 'C. Michael Pilato'; dev@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: svn commit: r1089856 -
> /subversion/trunk/subversion/tests/cmdline/switch_tests.py
>
"Bert Huijben" writes:
> I like to think of it this way (and the current WC-NG tree model agrees):
>
> A wc-wc copy is created from what is currently in your working copy and
> copies are not affected by BASE operations; just like a non svn copy would
> do.
>
> So following this reasoning a copy
> -Original Message-
> From: Greg Stein [mailto:gst...@gmail.com]
> Sent: dinsdag 12 april 2011 4:41
> To: dev@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: svn commit: r1091262 -
> /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/wc_db.c
>
> Woah. When did svn_sqlite__prepare arrive?
>
> I'm basically -1
> -Original Message-
> From: Ryan J Ollos [mailto:ry...@physiosonics.com]
> Sent: dinsdag 12 april 2011 0:36
> To: dev@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: SVN reports that all targets are not part of same working copy
when
> there is an svn:external that points within the repository
>
>
>
On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 08:10 -0500, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
> matplotlib is fairly popular and flexible. You can find an example in
> our repo in tools/dev/graph-dav-servers.py. There is also decent
> online documentation.
Wow, this looks like my new favourite way to plot!
This is so great, I can h
On Apr 11, 2011 10:58 PM, "Hyrum K Wright" wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 9:41 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> > Woah. When did svn_sqlite__prepare arrive?
>
> $ svnd blame subversion/libsvn_subr/sqlite.c | grep svn_sqlite__prepare
> 875453hwright
> SVN_ERR(svn_sqlite__prepare(&db->prepared_stmts
29 matches
Mail list logo
