Re: [PATCH] First step for issue #3702 (case-only renames on Windows) - now blocked by libsvn_client

2011-04-16 Thread Johan Corveleyn
2011/4/16 Branko Čibej : > On 16.04.2011 16:14, Johan Corveleyn wrote: >> Do I have to worry about differences between on-disk casing and wc-db >> casing of a path? Is that possible? I guess it is by using non-svn >> commands, but I bet that's an invalid state of the wc (I know that in >> 1.6, if y

RE: svn commit: r1092660 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc: adm_ops.c crop.c wc_db.c wc_db.h

2011-04-16 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Greg Stein [mailto:gst...@gmail.com] > Sent: zaterdag 16 april 2011 0:12 > To: Bert Huijben > Cc: dev@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Re: svn commit: r1092660 - in > /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc: adm_ops.c crop.c wc_db.c > wc_db.h > > On Fri, Apr 1

Re: [PATCH] First step for issue #3702 (case-only renames on Windows) - now blocked by libsvn_client

2011-04-16 Thread Branko Čibej
On 16.04.2011 16:14, Johan Corveleyn wrote: > Do I have to worry about differences between on-disk casing and wc-db > casing of a path? Is that possible? I guess it is by using non-svn > commands, but I bet that's an invalid state of the wc (I know that in > 1.6, if you run into this, svn gets all

Re: [PATCH] First step for issue #3702 (case-only renames on Windows) - now blocked by libsvn_client

2011-04-16 Thread Johan Corveleyn
2011/4/16 Branko Čibej : > On 16.04.2011 10:17, Johan Corveleyn wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Following discussion in [1], I tried to write a patch for issue #3702 >> ("svn ren TODO todo" not work on windows). As mentioned by Bert in >> comment to the issue [2], we need to avoid letting 'svn move' convert >>

Re: Layering violations in the FS cache code? (was "svn commit: r1091573 - /subversion/trunk/build.conf")

2011-04-16 Thread Stefan Fuhrmann
On 14.04.2011 22:32, Branko Čibej wrote: On 14.04.2011 21:03, Daniel Shahaf wrote: On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 14:43 -0400, "C. Michael Pilato" wrote: On 04/13/2011 06:52 PM, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote: The code in question has evolved over many months so it is very possible that the name of svn_fs_get_c

Re: [PATCH] First step for issue #3702 (case-only renames on Windows) - now blocked by libsvn_client

2011-04-16 Thread Branko Čibej
On 16.04.2011 10:17, Johan Corveleyn wrote: > Hi, > > Following discussion in [1], I tried to write a patch for issue #3702 > ("svn ren TODO todo" not work on windows). As mentioned by Bert in > comment to the issue [2], we need to avoid letting 'svn move' convert > the destination path to on-disk

[PATCH] First step for issue #3702 (case-only renames on Windows) - now blocked by libsvn_client

2011-04-16 Thread Johan Corveleyn
Hi, Following discussion in [1], I tried to write a patch for issue #3702 ("svn ren TODO todo" not work on windows). As mentioned by Bert in comment to the issue [2], we need to avoid letting 'svn move' convert the destination path to on-disk casing in this case, so that's what the below patch doe