On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Julian Foad julian.f...@wandisco.com wrote:
Hyrum K Wright wrote:
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Hyrum K Wright hy...@hyrumwright.org
wrote:
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Julian Foad julian.f...@wandisco.com
wrote:
This is a post-1.7 RFC.
Most
From IRC this afternoon:
[2:55pm] Bert: Maybe it would be easier to build an api to get you a
list of targets that match a specific depth... And then pass that list
of targets to libsvn_wc. (In theory it might blow out of memory; but
it keeps things simple)
[2:56pm] Bert: Then libsvn_wc does it
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote:
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 20:01:20 +0200:
- In fact: the same problem holds true for other commands as well: how
to revert both sides of this move? Ok, one can revert in two steps ...
- Maybe a
What's the relationship between cancellation functions and
transactions in wc-ng?
In the interests of performance and correctness, we've been moving
toward a model where more and more gets done in a single wc-ng
transaction. I've no problem with that, and like the atomicity and
speed it gives
On 22.04.2011 23:07, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name
wrote:
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 20:01:20 +0200:
- In fact: the same problem holds true for other commands as well: how
to revert both sides of this move?
Hi,
I've just updated to trunk@1096029, and have noticed the following change in
behavior.
Previously, any reproduction script I write has the following pattern:
svn checkout url workingcopy
pushd workingcopy
svn mkdir trunk
svn commit
svn switch url/trunk .
This used to work fine. But
On 22.04.2011 23:11, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
What's the relationship between cancellation functions and
transactions in wc-ng?
In the interests of performance and correctness, we've been moving
toward a model where more and more gets done in a single wc-ng
transaction. I've no problem with
2011/4/22 Branko Čibej br...@e-reka.si:
On 22.04.2011 23:11, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
What's the relationship between cancellation functions and
transactions in wc-ng?
In the interests of performance and correctness, we've been moving
toward a model where more and more gets done in a single
On 22.04.2011 23:34, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
2011/4/22 Branko Čibej br...@e-reka.si:
On 22.04.2011 23:11, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
What's the relationship between cancellation functions and
transactions in wc-ng?
In the interests of performance and correctness, we've been moving
toward a model
On 04/22/2011 05:15 PM, Daniel Becroft wrote:
Hi,
I've just updated to trunk@1096029, and have noticed the following change in
behavior.
Previously, any reproduction script I write has the following pattern:
svn checkout url workingcopy
pushd workingcopy
svn mkdir trunk
svn commit
On 04/22/2011 11:40 PM, Daniel Becroft wrote:
But then you're
asking to switch a working copy which reflects trunk's *parent directory*
to
trunk's URL.
Once trunk is committed, shouldn't trunk share ancestry with it's parent? (I
know I certainly share ancestry with my
11 matches
Mail list logo
