> ==
>
> > --- subversion/trunk/subversion/svnadmin/main.c (original)
> > +++ subversion/trunk/subversion/svnadmin/main.c Sat Apr 23 13:59:23
> 2011
> > @@ -2001,4 +2001,7 @@ subcommand_crashtest(apr_getopt_t *os, v
> >
>
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 8:59 AM, wrote:
> Author: stefan2
> Date: Sat Apr 23 13:59:23 2011
> New Revision: 1096150
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1096150&view=rev
> Log:
> * subversion/svnadmin/main.c
> (subcommand_crashtest): silence 'not all control paths return a value'
> warning
stef...@apache.org wrote on Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 15:00:29 -:
> Modified: subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_subr/stream.c
> URL:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_subr/stream.c?rev=1096157&r1=1096156&r2=1096157&view=diff
> ===
[[[
subversion/libsvn_wc/diff.c: In function ‘open_file’:
subversion/libsvn_wc/diff.c:1480: warning: passing argument 11 of
‘svn_wc__db_base_get_info’ from incompatible pointer type
subversion/libsvn_wc/wc_db.h:749: note: expected ‘const struct svn_checksum_t
**’ but argument is of type ‘struct s
On Sat, 23 Apr 2011 07:15 +1000, "Daniel Becroft" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've just updated to trunk@1096029, and have noticed the following change in
> behavior.
>
> Previously, any reproduction script I write has the following pattern:
>
> svn checkout workingcopy
> > pushd workingcopy
> > svn mkdi
On Sat, 23 Apr 2011 11:55 +0300, "Daniel Shahaf"
wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Apr 2011 23:07 +0200, "Johan Corveleyn" wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Daniel Shahaf
> > wrote:
> > > Johan Corveleyn wrote on Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 20:01:20 +0200:
> > >> - In fact: the same problem holds true fo
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 2:13 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> On 04/22/2011 11:40 PM, Daniel Becroft wrote:
> > But then you're
> > asking to switch a working copy which reflects trunk's *parent
> directory* to
> > trunk's URL.
> >
> >
> > Once trunk is committed, shouldn't trunk share a
On Fri, 22 Apr 2011 23:07 +0200, "Johan Corveleyn" wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Daniel Shahaf
> wrote:
> > Johan Corveleyn wrote on Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 20:01:20 +0200:
> >> - In fact: the same problem holds true for other commands as well: how
> >> to revert both sides of this move
8 matches
Mail list logo