RE: svn commit: r1096150 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/svnadmin/main.c

2011-04-23 Thread Bert Huijben
> == > > > --- subversion/trunk/subversion/svnadmin/main.c (original) > > +++ subversion/trunk/subversion/svnadmin/main.c Sat Apr 23 13:59:23 > 2011 > > @@ -2001,4 +2001,7 @@ subcommand_crashtest(apr_getopt_t *os, v > > >

Re: svn commit: r1096150 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/svnadmin/main.c

2011-04-23 Thread Hyrum K Wright
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 8:59 AM, wrote: > Author: stefan2 > Date: Sat Apr 23 13:59:23 2011 > New Revision: 1096150 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1096150&view=rev > Log: > * subversion/svnadmin/main.c >  (subcommand_crashtest): silence 'not all control paths return a value' >   warning

Re: svn commit: r1096157 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_subr: config_win.c stream.c

2011-04-23 Thread Daniel Shahaf
stef...@apache.org wrote on Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 15:00:29 -: > Modified: subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_subr/stream.c > URL: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_subr/stream.c?rev=1096157&r1=1096156&r2=1096157&view=diff > ===

Compiler warnings in HEAD (wc/diff.c)

2011-04-23 Thread Daniel Shahaf
[[[ subversion/libsvn_wc/diff.c: In function ‘open_file’: subversion/libsvn_wc/diff.c:1480: warning: passing argument 11 of ‘svn_wc__db_base_get_info’ from incompatible pointer type subversion/libsvn_wc/wc_db.h:749: note: expected ‘const struct svn_checksum_t **’ but argument is of type ‘struct s

mergeinfo assertion in trunk Re: 'svn switch' now requires --ignore-ancestry?

2011-04-23 Thread Daniel Shahaf
On Sat, 23 Apr 2011 07:15 +1000, "Daniel Becroft" wrote: > Hi, > > I've just updated to trunk@1096029, and have noticed the following change in > behavior. > > Previously, any reproduction script I write has the following pattern: > > svn checkout workingcopy > > pushd workingcopy > > svn mkdi

Re: [PATCH] First step for issue #3702 (case-only renames on Windows) - now blocked by libsvn_client

2011-04-23 Thread Daniel Shahaf
On Sat, 23 Apr 2011 11:55 +0300, "Daniel Shahaf" wrote: > On Fri, 22 Apr 2011 23:07 +0200, "Johan Corveleyn" wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Daniel Shahaf > > wrote: > > > Johan Corveleyn wrote on Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 20:01:20 +0200: > > >> - In fact: the same problem holds true fo

Re: 'svn switch' now requires --ignore-ancestry?

2011-04-23 Thread Daniel Becroft
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 2:13 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote: > On 04/22/2011 11:40 PM, Daniel Becroft wrote: > > But then you're > > asking to switch a working copy which reflects trunk's *parent > directory* to > > trunk's URL. > > > > > > Once trunk is committed, shouldn't trunk share a

Re: [PATCH] First step for issue #3702 (case-only renames on Windows) - now blocked by libsvn_client

2011-04-23 Thread Daniel Shahaf
On Fri, 22 Apr 2011 23:07 +0200, "Johan Corveleyn" wrote: > On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Daniel Shahaf > wrote: > > Johan Corveleyn wrote on Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 20:01:20 +0200: > >> - In fact: the same problem holds true for other commands as well: how > >> to revert both sides of this move