Following up to try and direct a solution...
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 03:15, Arwin Arni wrote:
> Hi,
>
> From what I've read in the responses, I understand that the dav_cache is not
> a NON-NULL field... and that neon uses it and serf doesn't.
>
> I've also not gone deep enough into the code to un
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 20:21, wrote:
> Author: rhuijben
> Date: Wed May 4 00:21:15 2011
> New Revision: 1099304
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1099304&view=rev
> Log:
> * subversion/libsvn_client/ra.c
> (push_wc_prop): Following up on r1096562, fix typo in pool name and
> rename p
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 19:12, wrote:
>...
> +++ subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_client/delete.c Tue May 3 23:12:48
> 2011
>...
> @@ -245,16 +233,19 @@ delete_urls(const apr_array_header_t *pa
> /* Call the path-based editor driver. */
> err = svn_delta_path_driver(editor, edit_baton, SVN
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 4:35 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
>
> On May 2, 2011 4:00 PM, "Hyrum K Wright" wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
>> > On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 10:55, wrote:
>> >> Author: hwright
>> >> Date: Mon May 2 14:55:34 2011
>> >> New Revision: 1098610
>> >>
>
I suggest (1). Fix issue 3865 with a new WC API to normalize targets, usable
by higher levels. That API would follow the 3-step process described at the
end of the issue description.
Cheers,
-g
On May 3, 2011 5:41 PM, "Johan Corveleyn" wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After the discussions in [1] and [2], I'
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Tue, May 03, 2011 at 23:29:26 +0200:
> On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 10:17 PM, Daniel Shahaf
> wrote:
> > Johan Corveleyn wrote on Tue, May 03, 2011 at 21:49:48 +0200:
> >> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 11:26 PM, Daniel Shahaf
> >> wrote:
> >> > Johan Corveleyn wrote on Mon, Apr 25,
On May 3, 2011 5:43 PM, wrote:
>
> Author: rhuijben
> Date: Tue May 3 21:42:57 2011
> New Revision: 1099273
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1099273&view=rev
> Log:
> Remove two unused arguments from svn_wc__db_base_get_info(). The recorded
size
> and recorded modification time values on
Hi all,
After the discussions in [1] and [2], I'd like to know if and how to
proceed with making case-only renames work on Windows (or
case-insensitive filesystems in general). Following my attempted patch
([1]), I got some good feedback from brane and danielsh, but I'd like
some more opinions, id
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 10:17 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Johan Corveleyn wrote on Tue, May 03, 2011 at 21:49:48 +0200:
>> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 11:26 PM, Daniel Shahaf
>> wrote:
>> > Johan Corveleyn wrote on Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 23:10:21 +0200:
>> >> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Daniel Shah
On May 2, 2011 4:00 PM, "Hyrum K Wright" wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> > On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 10:55, wrote:
> >> Author: hwright
> >> Date: Mon May 2 14:55:34 2011
> >> New Revision: 1098610
> >>
> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1098610&view=rev
> >
How about after r1099145?
On May 3, 2011 12:15 PM, "Philip Martin" wrote:
> Philip Martin writes:
>
>> Greg Stein writes:
>>
>>> Update: this is caused by CONTENT_STATE in close_file() not getting a
>>> proper value when fb->obstruction_found==1. It affects the
>>> notification later in the func
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 16:03, wrote:
>>...
>> +++ subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/info.c Tue May 3 20:03:13 2011
>> @@ -172,11 +172,12 @@ build_info_for_entry(svn_info2_t **info,
>> /* A default */
>> tmpinfo->size = SVN_INVALID_FILE
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 3:23 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 15:35, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
>> On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 2:24 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 15:04, wrote:
Author: hwright
Date: Tue May 3 19:04:24 2011
New Revision: 1099193
UR
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 16:03, wrote:
>...
> +++ subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/info.c Tue May 3 20:03:13 2011
> @@ -172,11 +172,12 @@ build_info_for_entry(svn_info2_t **info,
> /* A default */
> tmpinfo->size = SVN_INVALID_FILESIZE;
>
> - SVN_ERR(svn_wc__node_get_schedule(&tmpinfo->w
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 15:35, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
> On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 2:24 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
>> On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 15:04, wrote:
>>> Author: hwright
>>> Date: Tue May 3 19:04:24 2011
>>> New Revision: 1099193
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1099193&view=rev
>>> Log
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Tue, May 03, 2011 at 21:49:48 +0200:
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 11:26 PM, Daniel Shahaf
> wrote:
> > Johan Corveleyn wrote on Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 23:10:21 +0200:
> >> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Daniel Shahaf
> >> wrote:
> >> > Johan Corveleyn wrote on Mon, Apr 25,
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 11:26 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Johan Corveleyn wrote on Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 23:10:21 +0200:
>> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Daniel Shahaf
>> wrote:
>> > Johan Corveleyn wrote on Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 01:08:24 +0200:
>> >> 2011/4/22 Branko Čibej :
>> >> > Meh. For no
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 2:24 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 15:04, wrote:
>> Author: hwright
>> Date: Tue May 3 19:04:24 2011
>> New Revision: 1099193
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1099193&view=rev
>> Log:
>> For info, don't fake a completely bogus revision for adde
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 15:04, wrote:
> Author: hwright
> Date: Tue May 3 19:04:24 2011
> New Revision: 1099193
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1099193&view=rev
> Log:
> For info, don't fake a completely bogus revision for added nodes, just
> report an invalid revision.
>
> In updating
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Stefan Küng wrote:
> On 03.05.2011 19:46, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 12:40 PM, Stefan Küng
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 03.05.2011 19:40, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Stefan Küng
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
On 03.05.2011 19:46, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 12:40 PM, Stefan Küng wrote:
On 03.05.2011 19:40, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Stefan Küng
wrote:
Hi,
Using a build from three days ago, I found that
svn info conflicted_file
doesn't report the si
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
> On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Julian Foad wrote:
>> On Tue, 2011-05-03 at 17:10 +0100, Julian Foad wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2011-05-03 at 18:02 +0200, Bert Huijben wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > -Original Message-
>>> > > From: Hyrum K Wright [m
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 12:40 PM, Stefan Küng wrote:
> On 03.05.2011 19:40, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Stefan Küng
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Using a build from three days ago, I found that
>>> svn info conflicted_file
>>> doesn't report the simple conflict (no
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Julian Foad wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-05-03 at 17:10 +0100, Julian Foad wrote:
>> On Tue, 2011-05-03 at 18:02 +0200, Bert Huijben wrote:
>> >
>> > > -Original Message-
>> > > From: Hyrum K Wright [mailto:hy...@hyrumwright.org]
>> > > Sent: dinsdag 3 mei 2011 17
On 03.05.2011 19:40, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Stefan Küng wrote:
Hi,
Using a build from three days ago, I found that
svn info conflicted_file
doesn't report the simple conflict (not a tree conflict but a text
conflict).
The doc string for 'conflicts' in the svn_w
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Stefan Küng wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Using a build from three days ago, I found that
> svn info conflicted_file
> doesn't report the simple conflict (not a tree conflict but a text
> conflict).
>
> The doc string for 'conflicts' in the svn_wc_info_t struct reads:
> Array o
Hi,
Using a build from three days ago, I found that
svn info conflicted_file
doesn't report the simple conflict (not a tree conflict but a text
conflict).
The doc string for 'conflicts' in the svn_wc_info_t struct reads:
Array of const svn_wc_conflict_description2_t * which contains info
on an
On Tue, 2011-05-03 at 17:10 +0100, Julian Foad wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-05-03 at 18:02 +0200, Bert Huijben wrote:
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Hyrum K Wright [mailto:hy...@hyrumwright.org]
> > > Sent: dinsdag 3 mei 2011 17:49
> > > To: Julian Foad
> > > Cc: Philip Martin; dev@subv
Philip Martin writes:
> Greg Stein writes:
>
>> Update: this is caused by CONTENT_STATE in close_file() not getting a
>> proper value when fb->obstruction_found==1. It affects the
>> notification later in the function.
>>
>> I'll tease out the logic tomorrow...
>
> I get a valgrind errors:
Bert
On Tue, 2011-05-03 at 18:02 +0200, Bert Huijben wrote:
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Hyrum K Wright [mailto:hy...@hyrumwright.org]
> > Sent: dinsdag 3 mei 2011 17:49
> > To: Julian Foad
> > Cc: Philip Martin; dev@subversion.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: svn info --recursive isn't report
> -Original Message-
> From: Hyrum K Wright [mailto:hy...@hyrumwright.org]
> Sent: dinsdag 3 mei 2011 17:49
> To: Julian Foad
> Cc: Philip Martin; dev@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: svn info --recursive isn't reporting tree-conflict-only nodes
>
> On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 10:19 AM, J
On Tue, 2011-05-03 at 16:56 +0100, Julian Foad wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-05-03 at 18:46 +0300, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > Julian Foad wrote on Tue, May 03, 2011 at 14:31:47 +0100:
> > > + # Check recursive info.
> > > +# ### This is currently dependent on ordering of the dict entries.
> > > + expec
On Tue, 2011-05-03 at 18:46 +0300, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Julian Foad wrote on Tue, May 03, 2011 at 14:31:47 +0100:
> > + # Check recursive info.
> > +# ### This is currently dependent on ordering of the dict entries.
> > + expected_infos = [{ 'Path' : r'.*[/\\]G' }]
> >for fname, action,
> C. Michael Pilato wrote on Mon, May 02, 2011 at 13:20:30 -0400:
> > On 04/27/2011 02:42 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > > to add other keys if you want) to
> ^/subversion/site/keys/$username.asc .
> >
> > I wonder if we couldn't reduce data duplication by instead
> recommending that
> > committers u
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 10:19 AM, Julian Foad wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-05-03 at 14:36 +0100, Philip Martin wrote:
>> Julian Foad writes:
>>
>> > I found a bug in "svn info -R": it doesn't report a node that has a tree
>> > conflict but otherwise is nonexistent, except if this node is the root
>> > no
Julian Foad wrote on Tue, May 03, 2011 at 14:31:47 +0100:
> + # Check recursive info.
> +# ### This is currently dependent on ordering of the dict entries.
> + expected_infos = [{ 'Path' : r'.*[/\\]G' }]
>for fname, action, reason in scenarios:
> +expected_str = ".*local %s, incoming
On Tue, 2011-05-03 at 14:36 +0100, Philip Martin wrote:
> Julian Foad writes:
>
> > I found a bug in "svn info -R": it doesn't report a node that has a tree
> > conflict but otherwise is nonexistent, except if this node is the root
> > node of the requested target path.
>
> I think that's an act
Hyrum K Wright writes:
>> SVN_ERR(svn_io_open_unique_file3(&ctx->svndiff, NULL, NULL,
>> - svn_io_file_del_on_pool_cleanup,
>> + svn_io_file_del_on_close,
>> ctx->pool, ctx->pool));
>
> This i
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 8:15 AM, wrote:
> Author: philip
> Date: Tue May 3 13:14:59 2011
> New Revision: 1099044
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1099044&view=rev
> Log:
> Commits that affect large numbers of files should work on systems that
> limit the number of files that can be open
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 17:20, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> On 05/03/2011 09:10 AM, Julian Foad wrote:
>> FWIW, personally I prefer the foo->bar(...) style.
>
> As do I.
>
+1.
--
Ivan Zhakov
Julian Foad writes:
> I found a bug in "svn info -R": it doesn't report a node that has a tree
> conflict but otherwise is nonexistent, except if this node is the root
> node of the requested target path.
I think that's an actual-only node. See
http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?
I found a bug in "svn info -R": it doesn't report a node that has a tree
conflict but otherwise is nonexistent, except if this node is the root
node of the requested target path.
The test for "info -R" in info_tests.py was not correctly checking the
output, and has been passing despite this bug.
On 05/03/2011 09:10 AM, Julian Foad wrote:
> FWIW, personally I prefer the foo->bar(...) style.
As do I.
--
C. Michael Pilato
CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Development On Demand
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Mon, 2011-05-02, Yellow wrote:
> Hyrum K Wright wrote on Mon, May 02, 2011 at 15:00:45 -0500:
> > On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 10:55, wrote:
> > >> Log:
> > >> Use our "typical" function call syntax when using function pointers in
> > >> the
Greg Stein writes:
> Update: this is caused by CONTENT_STATE in close_file() not getting a
> proper value when fb->obstruction_found==1. It affects the
> notification later in the function.
>
> I'll tease out the logic tomorrow...
I get a valgrind errors:
CMD: svn co
file:///home/pm/sw/subvers
"Markus Schaber" writes:
> I'm currently working on integration of Subversion support into
> CoDeSys[2], using the latest SharpSVN based on subversion 1.6.16.
>
> One current problem is that the revert command refuses to work on a
> copied directory with a depth different to infinity. This seems
Update: this is caused by CONTENT_STATE in close_file() not getting a
proper value when fb->obstruction_found==1. It affects the
notification later in the function.
I'll tease out the logic tomorrow...
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 07:32, Greg Stein wrote:
> I have local failures on checkout_test 4 5 6
47 matches
Mail list logo
