On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 6:56 AM, Paul Burba wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 1:02 AM, Joe Swatosh wrote:
>> Hi Paul,
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 7:11 PM, Paul Burba wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 5:54 PM, Hyrum K Wright
>>> wrote:
All,
>>
>>
>>>
>>> TESTED:
>>> ---
>>> [Rel
Daniel Shahaf writes:
> Looks like Bert committed a functionally equivalent fix as part of r1138474.
>
Bert,
May I know why this patch was not considered? Looking at the commit I
could not see any difference.
Thanks and Regards
Noorul
> Noorul Islam K M wrote on Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 16:40:50
On 06/22/2011 07:30 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Bolstridge, Andrew wrote on Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 14:51:37 +:
>> Absolutely. The first thing to do is provide serf as a 2nd option,
>> make a big song and dance about how great it is, and basically
>> advertise the fact that it is there (from a user
On 06/22/2011 05:06 PM, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
> Thanks to those have have provided signatures. I've sent the tarballs
> to the mirrors for distribution. The official release should happen
> tomorrow.
Better late than never? (Tests completed while I was away from the computer.)
Bolstridge, Andrew wrote on Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 14:51:37 +:
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Stefan Sperling [mailto:s...@elego.de]
> > Sent: 21 June 2011 18:27
> > To: Justin Erenkrantz
> > Cc: Greg Stein; Daniel Shahaf; dev@subversion.apache.org; OBones; Uwe
> > Schuster
> > Subje
Philip Martin wrote on Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 15:01:34 +0100:
> Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis writes:
>
> >> checking whether Apache's APR is compatible configure's APR... no
> >> configure: error: Apache's APR version 1.3.8 doesn't match configure's
> >> 1.4.5
> >>
> >> This buildbot was b
Looks like Bert committed a functionally equivalent fix as part of r1138474.
Noorul Islam K M wrote on Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 16:40:50 +0530:
> +++ subversion/libsvn_wc/diff_editor.c(working copy)
> @@ -1532,13 +1531,8 @@
>
>
>
> - /* This is the file that will contain the pristine re
Stefan Sperling wrote on Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 22:53:13 +0200:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 04:43:38PM -0400, Greg Stein wrote:
> > Is there a way that this can be tested? ie. avoid similar situations
> > in the future?
>
> I don't know. I came across this because I saw code that did:
>
> peg_rev =
Thanks to those have have provided signatures. I've sent the tarballs
to the mirrors for distribution. The official release should happen
tomorrow.
-Hyrum
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 4:54 PM, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
> All,
>
> The next in our series of 1.7.0 prereleases is now posted for testing
> a
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 04:43:38PM -0400, Greg Stein wrote:
> Is there a way that this can be tested? ie. avoid similar situations
> in the future?
I don't know. I came across this because I saw code that did:
peg_rev = INVALID_REVNUM;
/* do nothing with peg_rev */
if (peg_rev == INVALIV_REVNU
Is there a way that this can be tested? ie. avoid similar situations
in the future?
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 11:50, wrote:
> Author: stsp
> Date: Wed Jun 22 15:50:54 2011
> New Revision: 1138516
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1138516&view=rev
> Log:
> * subversion/libsvn_client/ra.c
>
On Jun 22, 2011 2:34 PM, "Philip Martin" wrote:
>
> Greg Stein writes:
>
> > On Jun 22, 2011 11:24 AM, "Philip Martin"
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Julian Foad writes:
> >>
> >> > anyone wanting to mix APR versions on purpose is the "odd man out"
and
> >> > should expect to have to futz with the config
Greg Stein writes:
> On Jun 22, 2011 11:24 AM, "Philip Martin"
> wrote:
>>
>> Julian Foad writes:
>>
>> > anyone wanting to mix APR versions on purpose is the "odd man out" and
>> > should expect to have to futz with the configuration.
>>
>> Does that mean manually editing configure? Or do we
On Jun 22, 2011 11:24 AM, "Philip Martin"
wrote:
>
> Julian Foad writes:
>
> > anyone wanting to mix APR versions on purpose is the "odd man out" and
> > should expect to have to futz with the configuration.
>
> Does that mean manually editing configure? Or do we have to provide a
> configure op
On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 16:23 +0100, Philip Martin wrote:
> Julian Foad writes:
>
> > anyone wanting to mix APR versions on purpose is the "odd man out" and
> > should expect to have to futz with the configuration.
>
> Does that mean manually editing configure? Or do we have to provide a
> config
Julian Foad writes:
> anyone wanting to mix APR versions on purpose is the "odd man out" and
> should expect to have to futz with the configuration.
Does that mean manually editing configure? Or do we have to provide a
configure option to relax the check?
--
Philip
Greg Hudson wrote on Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 11:01:05 -0400:
> On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 02:29 -0400, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > From looking at the code, svn_io_open_unique_file3() would force the
> > file to have a mode of 0600|umask() instead of just 0600
>
> The umask removes file permissions from the
On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 15:01 +0100, Philip Martin wrote:
> Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis writes:
>
> >> checking whether Apache's APR is compatible configure's APR... no
> >> configure: error: Apache's APR version 1.3.8 doesn't match configure's
> >> 1.4.5
> >>
> >> This buildbot was build
On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 02:29 -0400, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> From looking at the code, svn_io_open_unique_file3() would force the
> file to have a mode of 0600|umask() instead of just 0600
The umask removes file permissions from the mode argument to open(); it
doesn't add permissions. (Unless there'
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefan Sperling [mailto:s...@elego.de]
> Sent: 21 June 2011 18:27
> To: Justin Erenkrantz
> Cc: Greg Stein; Daniel Shahaf; dev@subversion.apache.org; OBones; Uwe
> Schuster
> Subject: Re: serf and sourceforge.net don't get along (was on users@: Re:
> 1.7.0-alph
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis writes:
>> checking whether Apache's APR is compatible configure's APR... no
>> configure: error: Apache's APR version 1.3.8 doesn't match configure's 1.4.5
>>
>> This buildbot was building successfully before the change. Should we
>> provide a configure flag
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 03:34:29PM +0200, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
wrote:
> 2011-06-22 13:48:52 Stefan Sperling napisał(a):
> > As can be seen here:
> > http://ci.apache.org/builders/bb-openbsd/builds/16/steps/Test%20bindings/logs/testlog-swig-rb
> > our ruby bindings tests fail to run
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 1:02 AM, Joe Swatosh wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 7:11 PM, Paul Burba wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 5:54 PM, Hyrum K Wright
>> wrote:
>>> All,
>>>
>
>
>>
>> TESTED:
>> ---
>> [Release-Build] x[ fsfs | bdb ] x [ file | svn | http (neon) | http (se
2011-06-22 15:42:03 Philip Martin napisał(a):
> Greg Stein writes:
>
> >>> Should we instead check that Subversion and Apache use the same APR? We
> >>> could do it by checking that "apxs2 -q APR_CONFIG" matches apr_config
> >>> found by configure.
> >>
> >> The server side needs to match httpd'
Greg Stein writes:
>>> Should we instead check that Subversion and Apache use the same APR? We
>>> could do it by checking that "apxs2 -q APR_CONFIG" matches apr_config
>>> found by configure.
>>
>> The server side needs to match httpd's APR. The client side can be different.
>>
>> Personally, I
2011-06-22 13:48:52 Stefan Sperling napisał(a):
> As can be seen here:
> http://ci.apache.org/builders/bb-openbsd/builds/16/steps/Test%20bindings/logs/testlog-swig-rb
> our ruby bindings tests fail to run with ruby 1.9.
>
> Does anyone know how to get this to work?
Maybe you need Test::Unit [1],
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 11:55:06AM +0100, Julian Foad wrote:
> Till, do you want to see the most recent commit, a behaviour which could
> be expressed as "-r PREV:COMMITTED"? If so, the syntax we would choose
> if we do implement this would probably be "-c COMMITTED". "-c PREV"
> which would mea
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 8:39 AM, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 7:06 AM, Paul Burba wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 10:11 PM, Paul Burba wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 5:54 PM, Hyrum K Wright
>>> wrote:
All,
The next in our series of 1.7.0 prereleases is n
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 7:06 AM, Paul Burba wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 10:11 PM, Paul Burba wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 5:54 PM, Hyrum K Wright
>> wrote:
>>> All,
>>>
>>> The next in our series of 1.7.0 prereleases is now posted for testing
>>> and siging: 1.7.0-alpha2. These are c
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 10:11 PM, Paul Burba wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 5:54 PM, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> The next in our series of 1.7.0 prereleases is now posted for testing
>> and siging: 1.7.0-alpha2. These are cut from trunk, and the magic rev
>> is r1137713. The buildbots
As can be seen here:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/bb-openbsd/builds/16/steps/Test%20bindings/logs/testlog-swig-rb
our ruby bindings tests fail to run with ruby 1.9.
Does anyone know how to get this to work?
If not, should we disallow ruby-1.9 at configure time and require
ruby-1.8 for Subversion
On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 16:50 +0530, Noorul Islam K M wrote:
> Julian Foad writes:
>
> > On Mon, 2011-06-20 at 11:31 +0800, Arpe, Kevin C wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I am a Subversion command-line tools user on Windows XP.
> >> Version string = svn, version 1.6.12 (r955767) / compiled Jun 21 201
Julian Foad writes:
> On Mon, 2011-06-20 at 11:31 +0800, Arpe, Kevin C wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am a Subversion command-line tools user on Windows XP.
>> Version string = svn, version 1.6.12 (r955767) / compiled Jun 21 2010,
>> 16:00:59
>>
>> I wrote my own diff3 command batch file. We use it
Julian Foad writes:
> Noorul Islam K M wrote:
>
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix for issue 3813
> [...]
>> [[[
>> Fix for issue 3813.
>> [...]
>> ]]]
>
> Hi Noorul. Please always include a brief description of the issue in
> the email subject line and in the log message. Anyone reading the text
> sh
[ dang: also send to dev@ ]
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 07:02, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 06:21, Philip Martin
> wrote:
>> phi...@apache.org writes:
>>
>>> Author: philip
>>> Date: Wed Jun 22 10:09:17 2011
>>> New Revision: 1138375
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1138
On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 12:01 +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 11:09:55AM +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> > Hiyas,
> >
> > as requested in the buddy peer review for feature requests I asked on
> > IRC for opinions to implement "svn diff -c PREV". There it was proposed
> > to ask her
phi...@apache.org writes:
> Author: philip
> Date: Wed Jun 22 10:09:17 2011
> New Revision: 1138375
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1138375&view=rev
> Log:
> * build/ac-macros/apache.m4
> (SVN_FIND_APACHE): Fix APR version checking, it was erroneously
>checking for any one characte
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 11:09:55AM +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> Hiyas,
>
> as requested in the buddy peer review for feature requests I asked on
> IRC for opinions to implement "svn diff -c PREV". There it was proposed
> to ask here.
>
> I am missing to use "svn diff -c PREV", which should show the
Not a trivial fix, unfortunately.
See http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2691
(and I remember another issue with a patch for 'diff -c HEAD', but can't
find it ATM.)
Till Maas wrote on Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 11:09:55 +0200:
> Hiyas,
>
> as requested in the buddy peer review for fe
Hiyas,
as requested in the buddy peer review for feature requests I asked on
IRC for opinions to implement "svn diff -c PREV". There it was proposed
to ask here.
I am missing to use "svn diff -c PREV", which should show the previous
commit without the changes to the current working copy.
Regards
Noorul Islam K M wrote:
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix for issue 3813
[...]
> [[[
> Fix for issue 3813.
> [...]
> ]]]
Hi Noorul. Please always include a brief description of the issue in
the email subject line and in the log message. Anyone reading the text
should be able to quickly know what it is
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 09:29:29AM +0300, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Noorul Islam K M wrote on Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 11:37:13 +0530:
> >
> > I am not really sure whether this patch is correct one since the comment
> > in diff_editor.c says this
> >
> > /* This is the file that will contain the prist
42 matches
Mail list logo
