Hi, Daniel,
Von: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:d...@daniel.shahaf.name]
It should be easy to implement editing revprops without using
SQLite:
in case someone modify revprop non-packed revprop file is created,
in
read operation non-packed revprop file should be considered as more
up-to-date. In
On Thursday 30 June 2011 08:19 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
On 06/30/2011 04:58 AM, ar...@apache.org wrote:
Author: arwin
Date: Thu Jun 30 08:58:11 2011
New Revision: 1141447
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1141447view=rev
Log:
Added branch milestones document.
* BRANCH-MILESTONES : New
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 11:15, i...@apache.org wrote:
Author: ivan
Date: Fri Jul 1 07:15:26 2011
New Revision: 1141845
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1141845view=rev
Log:
mod_dav_svn: Accept HTTPv2 style URIs in X-SVN-VR-Base header. This fixes
problem that ra_serf client downloads
On 30.06.2011 22:21, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
With such a tantalizing name, I look forward to seeing the
BRANCH-README more fully explaining this branches purpose.
Done in r1141868.
-- Stefan^2.
-Hyrum
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 2:43 PM,stef...@apache.org wrote:
Author: stefan2
Date: Thu Jun 30
Hi,
Sometimes, a (part of a) working copy gets corrupted (errors like
'checksum mismatch ...' while running 'update'). Maybe it happened
because a third-party tool has messed with the base files, or with the
entries file, or ... or maybe it happened because of a bug in svn.
This was/is deemed
Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com writes:
AFAICS, this will no longer be possible with wc-ng. Has anyone thought
about this problem? Any ideas on how one could recover cheaply from
a small (local to a single directory or file) corruption in the wc
(either incorrect meta-data, or corrupt
Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com writes:
Hi,
Sometimes, a (part of a) working copy gets corrupted (errors like
'checksum mismatch ...' while running 'update'). Maybe it happened
because a third-party tool has messed with the base files, or with the
entries file, or ... or maybe it happened
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Noorul Islam K M noo...@collab.net wrote:
Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com writes:
Hi,
Sometimes, a (part of a) working copy gets corrupted (errors like
'checksum mismatch ...' while running 'update'). Maybe it happened
because a third-party tool has messed
-Original Message-
From: Peter Samuelson [mailto:pe...@p12n.org]
Sent: 30 June 2011 23:58
To: dev@subversion.apache.org
Subject: Re: Does fsfs revprop packing no longer allow usage of traditional
backup software?
[Hyrum K Wright]
I like this idea, but it would seem to
Hi,
This is follow-up to r1141600. This patch updates a deprecated function
call in libsvn_repos/repos.c.
Attaching the patch and log.
Thanks Regards,
Vijayaguru
Index: subversion/libsvn_repos/repos.c
===
---
I am revisiting this issue after 6 months. I stopped working on this
because everyone was busy working towards 1.7 release. The then thread
was getting little attention.
Link to the issue is http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3690
and following is the initial comment in the
Markus Schaber wrote on Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 08:51:43 +0200:
Hi, Daniel,
Von: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:d...@daniel.shahaf.name]
It should be easy to implement editing revprops without using
SQLite:
in case someone modify revprop non-packed revprop file is created,
in
read operation
Hyrum K Wright wrote on Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 16:33:16 -0500:
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Peter Samuelson pe...@p12n.org wrote:
[Ivan Zhakov]
It should be easy to implement editing revprops without using SQLite:
in case someone modify revprop non-packed revprop file is created, in
I replied elsethread (basically saying +1).
I'll also go ahead and file a 1.7 blocker issue for the improvements
suggested in this thread. (All of them require changing the f5 format,
and will require more headache if they have to be done as f6 on top of
current f5)
Peter Samuelson wrote on
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 5:21 PM, Peter Samuelson pe...@p12n.org wrote:
[kmra...@rockwellcollins.com]
I would love to have revprop packing, but not at the cost of
potentially disabling the use of traditional backup software.
Is there a way to disable fsfs revprop packing, or at least have
it
http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3944
Daniel Shahaf wrote on Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 16:07:55 +0300:
I'll also go ahead and file a 1.7 blocker issue for the improvements
suggested in this thread. (All of them require changing the f5 format,
and will require more headache if
Mark Phippard wrote on Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 09:10:31 -0400:
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 5:21 PM, Peter Samuelson pe...@p12n.org wrote:
[kmra...@rockwellcollins.com]
I would love to have revprop packing, but not at the cost of
potentially disabling the use of traditional backup software.
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Daniel Shahaf danie...@elego.de wrote:
Mark Phippard wrote on Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 09:10:31 -0400:
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 5:21 PM, Peter Samuelson pe...@p12n.org wrote:
[kmra...@rockwellcollins.com]
I would love to have revprop packing, but not at the cost
I plan to apply the second patch in the issue, it restores the 1.6
libtool detection and fixes the the --with-experimental-libtool problem.
The code did require maintenance in the past, and may require
maintenance in the future, but it hasn't required any maintenance in the
last three years on
-Original Message-
From: i...@visualsvn.com [mailto:i...@visualsvn.com] On Behalf Of Ivan
Zhakov
Sent: vrijdag 1 juli 2011 10:05
To: Subversion Development
Subject: Re: svn commit: r1141845 -
/subversion/trunk/subversion/mod_dav_svn/util.c
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 11:15,
[ strictly speaking I'm not addressing /all/ your points, if I missed
any feel free to re-raise them ]
Mark Phippard wrote on Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 09:27:57 -0400:
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Daniel Shahaf danie...@elego.de wrote:
Mark Phippard wrote on Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 09:10:31 -0400:
stef...@apache.org wrote on Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 08:34:20 -:
Author: stefan2
Date: Fri Jul 1 08:34:20 2011
New Revision: 1141868
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1141868view=rev
Log:
On the svn_mutex branch, add a readme as requested.
* BRANCH-README: new file
Added:
Especially since the common case, as you put it, is that the open()
returns ENOENT, file not found. _That_ case may or may not be
expensive, but it's quite different from the usual consideration of
whether stat() is expensive. Not least because stat() is usually
considered in context
Philip Martin wrote on Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 10:26:34 +0100:
Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com writes:
AFAICS, this will no longer be possible with wc-ng. Has anyone thought
about this problem? Any ideas on how one could recover cheaply from
a small (local to a single directory or file)
Daniel Shahaf danie...@elego.de writes:
Unrelated question: how do we handle the case of a client, linked to
libsvn_fs 1.6, that opens an svn_fs_t object and then, concurrently,
someone runs 'svnadmin1.7 upgrade'?
The FS object is now invalid (and must be closed), but would the old
client
Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name writes:
Philip Martin wrote on Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 10:26:34 +0100:
Corrupt pristine can be recovered by doing:
$ svn up -r0 wc/some/path
$ svn up wc
That will also work for some, but by no means all, instances of corrupt
metadata.
And 'svn up
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 19:04, Peter Samuelson pe...@p12n.org wrote:
Especially since the common case, as you put it, is that the open()
returns ENOENT, file not found. _That_ case may or may not be
expensive, but it's quite different from the usual consideration of
whether stat() is
[Bolstridge, Andrew]
Ok, but a) why can't the list of unpacked revprop files be cached at
startup and updated as revprops are edited.
Because there's more than one server process. I have a repository at
work that is accessed over file://, svn://, and https://. (Someone
used to use svn+ssh://
On 07/01/2011 09:56 AM, Philip Martin wrote:
I plan to apply the second patch in the issue, it restores the 1.6
libtool detection and fixes the the --with-experimental-libtool problem.
There's a Nike slogan which comes to mind right about now...
--
C. Michael Pilato cmpil...@collab.net
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 8:05 AM, Daniel Shahaf danie...@elego.de wrote:
Hyrum K Wright wrote on Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 16:33:16 -0500:
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Peter Samuelson pe...@p12n.org wrote:
[Ivan Zhakov]
It should be easy to implement editing revprops without using SQLite:
Hyrum K Wright wrote on Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 11:21:58 -0500:
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 8:05 AM, Daniel Shahaf danie...@elego.de wrote:
Hyrum K Wright wrote on Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 16:33:16 -0500:
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Peter Samuelson pe...@p12n.org wrote:
[Ivan Zhakov]
It
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Paul Burba ptbu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 4:48 AM, Julian Foad julian.f...@wandisco.com wrote:
On Tue, 2011-06-28, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
On 06/28/2011 01:37 PM, Paul Burba wrote:
Hi Julian,
I hadn't realized using in-out parameters
pbu...@apache.org wrote on Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 16:31:22 -:
Author: pburba
Date: Fri Jul 1 16:31:21 2011
New Revision: 1141981
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1141981view=rev
Log:
Get svn_ra_get_mergeinfo2 out of the business of communicating server
capabilities via an in-out
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 18:14, Bert Huijben b...@qqmail.nl wrote:
-Original Message-
From: i...@visualsvn.com [mailto:i...@visualsvn.com] On Behalf Of Ivan
Zhakov
Sent: vrijdag 1 juli 2011 10:05
To: Subversion Development
Subject: Re: svn commit: r1141845 -
2011/7/1 Peter Samuelson pe...@p12n.org:
If this is too much trouble, b) why not write a list of edited
revprop files to a single file instead
(...) Opening, reading, and parsing this file isn't going
to be cheaper than a _single_ attempt to open a revprop file that does
not exist.
Passing just the revision is not enough to allow the server to provide
the svndiff. It really needs the fspath and the revision (or the update
report) to fetch the base revision for a path in a separate (stateless)
request while supporting switched paths.
Bert Huijben (Cell phone) From: Ivan
[Hyrum K Wright]
My understanding would be that we'd pack revprops just like we pack
revision (one single concat'd file per shard), and then store any
edits in separate files. We'd then repack the edits into the pack
files when an admin subsequently runs 'svnadmin pack'.
Aside from the
Daniel Shahaf wrote on Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 19:29:50 +0300:
Hyrum K Wright wrote on Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 11:21:58 -0500:
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 8:05 AM, Daniel Shahaf danie...@elego.de wrote:
Hyrum K Wright wrote on Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 16:33:16 -0500:
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 3:27 PM,
Daniel Shahaf wrote on Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 21:30:15 +0300:
Daniel Shahaf wrote on Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 19:29:50 +0300:
Hyrum K Wright wrote on Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 11:21:58 -0500:
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 8:05 AM, Daniel Shahaf danie...@elego.de wrote:
Hyrum K Wright wrote on Thu, Jun 30,
Thanks. (And sorry for the tone/implication in the previous email)
pbu...@apache.org wrote on Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 18:19:07 -:
Author: pburba
Revision: 1141981
Modified property: svn:log
Modified: svn:log at Fri Jul 1 18:19:07 2011
On Jul 1, 2011, at 12:04 PM, stef...@apache.org wrote:
Author: stefan2
Date: Fri Jul 1 19:04:29 2011
New Revision: 1142026
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1142026view=rev
Log:
Introduce the svn_mutex API and implement it
* subversion/include/private/svn_mutex.h
new private
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote:
pbu...@apache.org wrote on Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 16:31:22 -:
Author: pburba
Date: Fri Jul 1 16:31:21 2011
New Revision: 1141981
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1141981view=rev
Log:
Get
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote:
Thanks. (And sorry for the tone/implication in the previous email)
No offense taken Daniel, the log message was wrong after all.
Regardless, it's the Friday before a long weekend here, so not much is
going to bother me
Daniel Shahaf wrote on Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 23:46:54 +0300:
rhuij...@apache.org wrote on Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 20:42:37 -:
Author: rhuijben
Date: Fri Jul 1 20:42:36 2011
New Revision: 1142088
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1142088view=rev
Log:
When renaming a file in
Philip mentioned 'svn up -r0' in another thread.
I did:
[[[
% $svn checkout --depth=empty
https://svn.eu.apache.org/repos/infra/infrastructure infra-freshwc
% cd infra-freshwc
% $svn up --set-depth=immediates . subdir1 subdir2
% $svn up --set-depth=infinity subdir3 trunk
% cd trunk
% $svn up
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 15:04, stef...@apache.org wrote:
...
+++ subversion/branches/svn_mutex/subversion/include/private/svn_mutex.h Fri
Jul 1 19:04:29 2011
...
+#ifndef SVN_MUTEX_H
+#define SVN_MUTEX_H
+
+#include apr_thread_mutex.h
+#include svn_error.h
Typical style is to put blank
On Jul 1, 2011, at 5:27 PM, stef...@apache.org wrote:
Author: stefan2
Date: Sat Jul 2 00:27:28 2011
New Revision: 1142130
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1142130view=rev
Log:
Replace usage of plain APR thread mutex API with the new svn_mutex
API in FSFS.
-#if APR_HAS_THREADS
-
47 matches
Mail list logo
