[[[
Index: subversion/libsvn_client/merge.c
===
--- subversion/libsvn_client/merge.c(revision 1174351)
+++ subversion/libsvn_client/merge.c(working copy)
@@ -6822,7 +6822,7 @@ do_file_merge(svn_mergeinfo_catalog_t result_catal
> [Steven Wu]
> > I am looking to revamp the entire site. Not just a minor update. But I like
> > to redevelop it with modern technology using HTML5, CSS3 and bit of JQuery.
Sorry, my honest opinion is that Steven sounds as if he is trying to sell snake
oil.
The terms he is using make me think h
[Steven Wu]
> I am looking to revamp the entire site. Not just a minor update. But I like
> to redevelop it with modern technology using HTML5, CSS3 and bit of JQuery.
> There would be major overhaul, from styling, structure, making it
> more engaging, possibly changing the navigation so it has d
Please edit the log message of r1174139 to mention it was reverted, thanks.
ne...@apache.org wrote on Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 14:40:25 -:
> Author: neels
> Date: Thu Sep 22 14:40:25 2011
> New Revision: 1174166
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1174166&view=rev
> Log:
> Revert r1174139.
On 09/22/2011 03:01 PM, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Neels J Hofmeyr wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I just noticed that, since "operative revision" != "peg revision", the
>> column names in the EXTERNALS table are confused/confusing.
>>
>> They are:
>>
>> def_operational_revi
Hello everybody,
I will help you for you help me. I created one script with my problem,
for see whether somebody advice.
By documentation [0], See in line 20 into attachments, I should not
have one struct of type [1] identical of the line 18 [2] with just
difference of extended fields (node_kind,
APR has a testsuite that includes a test for apr_atomic_xchgptr. Does
that test detect the problem?
Not as written, but it can trivially be made to. A patch has been
added to the ARP bugzilla.
On 20.09.2011 23:40, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Re-reading this to see how it affects the fs-successor-ids work (in
particular, whether it supersedes the done/planned work), one question:
Why do you refer to skip-deltas?
I haven't thought too deeply about the skip-delta issue
but that is my reasonin
Greg Stein wrote on Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 14:25:59 -0400:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 13:55, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > Greg Stein wrote on Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 13:33:37 -0400:
> >...
> >> Can we get the nightly to do it? ie. for devs rather than part of official
> >> released API doc?
> >
> > This wou
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 13:55, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Greg Stein wrote on Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 13:33:37 -0400:
>...
>> Can we get the nightly to do it? ie. for devs rather than part of official
>> released API doc?
>
> This would require someone to convert all the docs in
> subversion/include/priv
Greg Stein wrote on Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 13:33:37 -0400:
> On Sep 22, 2011 2:49 AM, "Hyrum K Wright" wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 3:31 AM, wrote:
> > > Author: danielsh
> > > Date: Thu Sep 22 02:31:06 2011
> > > New Revision: 1173935
> > >
> > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=11
On Sep 22, 2011 8:01 AM, "Daniel Shahaf" wrote:
>
> Greg Stein wrote on Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 06:16:07 -0400:
> > On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 00:34, Daniel Shahaf
wrote:
> > > gst...@apache.org wrote on Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 17:02:35 -:
> > >> Author: gstein
> > >> Date: Wed Sep 21 17:02:34 2011
>
On Sep 22, 2011 2:49 AM, "Hyrum K Wright" wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 3:31 AM, wrote:
> > Author: danielsh
> > Date: Thu Sep 22 02:31:06 2011
> > New Revision: 1173935
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1173935&view=rev
> > Log:
> > * subversion/include/private/svn_subr_private
phi...@apache.org wrote on Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 13:56:04 -:
> Author: philip
> Date: Thu Sep 22 13:56:03 2011
> New Revision: 1174142
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1174142&view=rev
> Log:
> * STATUS: Propose r1174111 (with danielsh via IRC).
>
> Modified:
> subversion/branches
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 3:06 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> On 09/21/2011 06:07 PM, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
>> Roll rc4 this weekend (or as soon as the backport is merged) and run
>> that on svn.apache.org to satisfy the concerns of those wanting more
>> testing.
>>
>> When we are satisfied, I'll cu
On 09/21/2011 06:07 PM, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
> Roll rc4 this weekend (or as soon as the backport is merged) and run
> that on svn.apache.org to satisfy the concerns of those wanting more
> testing.
>
> When we are satisfied, I'll cut the final release from the same magic
> revision as rc4, to sim
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Neels J Hofmeyr wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I just noticed that, since "operative revision" != "peg revision", the
> column names in the EXTERNALS table are confused/confusing.
>
> They are:
>
> def_operational_revision (supposed to be the peg rev)
> def_revision
Hi all,
I just noticed that, since "operative revision" != "peg revision", the
column names in the EXTERNALS table are confused/confusing.
They are:
def_operational_revision (supposed to be the peg rev)
def_revision (supposed to be the operat*ive* rev)
So I'd like to change that.
Greg Stein wrote on Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 06:12:58 -0400:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 22:53, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > [[[
> > Remove an edge case from svn_spillbuf__is_empty().
> >
> > * subversion/include/private/svn_subr_private.h
> > (svn_spillbuf_is_empty): Stop documenting this bug in the doc
Greg Stein wrote on Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 06:16:07 -0400:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 00:34, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > gst...@apache.org wrote on Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 17:02:35 -:
> >> Author: gstein
> >> Date: Wed Sep 21 17:02:34 2011
> >> New Revision: 1173759
> >>
> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org
Hyrum K Wright wrote on Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 07:49:17 +0100:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 3:31 AM, wrote:
> > Author: danielsh
> > Date: Thu Sep 22 02:31:06 2011
> > New Revision: 1173935
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1173935&view=rev
> > Log:
> > * subversion/include/private/svn_sub
> -Original Message-
> From: ne...@apache.org [mailto:ne...@apache.org]
> Sent: donderdag 22 september 2011 12:54
> To: comm...@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: svn commit: r1174051 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion:
> libsvn_client/cleanup.c libsvn_subr/dirent_uri.c
>
> Author: neels
>
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 22:56, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> gst...@apache.org wrote on Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 13:29:07 -:
>> Author: gstein
>> Date: Tue Sep 20 13:29:06 2011
>> New Revision: 1173137
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1173137&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Initial test for the new spill
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 00:34, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> gst...@apache.org wrote on Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 17:02:35 -:
>> Author: gstein
>> Date: Wed Sep 21 17:02:34 2011
>> New Revision: 1173759
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1173759&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Rename the private APIs to incl
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 22:53, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> [[[
> Remove an edge case from svn_spillbuf__is_empty().
>
> * subversion/include/private/svn_subr_private.h
> (svn_spillbuf_is_empty): Stop documenting this bug in the doc string.
>
> * subversion/libsvn_subr/spillbuf.c
> (read_data): Also
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 04:39, Bert Huijben wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: danie...@apache.org [mailto:danie...@apache.org]
>> Sent: donderdag 22 september 2011 5:04
>> To: comm...@subversion.apache.org
>> Subject: svn commit: r1173942 -
>> /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_subr/s
Mattias Engdegård writes:
>> Mattias Engdegård (CC'd) reports on IRC that apr_atomic_xchgptr() in
>> recent APR's is broken, and the brokenness can affect Subversion under
>> certain circumstances:
>>
>> <@danielsh> wayita: t
>> < wayita> gcc 4.0.x or older
>> < wayita> apr 1.3.x or newer
>> < wa
> -Original Message-
> From: danie...@apache.org [mailto:danie...@apache.org]
> Sent: donderdag 22 september 2011 5:04
> To: comm...@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: svn commit: r1173942 -
> /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_subr/spillbuf.c
>
> Author: danielsh
> Date: Thu Sep 22 03:03
28 matches
Mail list logo
