"Bert Huijben" writes:
> How can you recover from this state?
> Can you delete the incomplete node? (It's parent?) or is the only way to
> recover to revert the root of the copy operation?
> If only that last case is true I wouldn't call it a defined database state.
I don't really understand the
On 18 October 2011 06:37, Joe Swatosh wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 4:42 AM, Bert Huijben wrote:
>>
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Mat Booth [mailto:mat.bo...@wandisco.com]
>>> Sent: maandag 17 oktober 2011 12:26
>>> To: Peter Samuelson
>>> Cc: dev@subversion.apache.org
>>> Subjec
rhuij...@apache.org writes:
> Author: rhuijben
> Date: Mon Oct 17 15:13:35 2011
> New Revision: 1185242
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1185242&view=rev
> Log:
> Remove the SQLITE_OPEN_SHAREDCACHE flag from opening SQLite databases.
> VisualSVN and AnkhSVN users are reporting errors caus
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 01:03:23AM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 03:44:11PM +0200, Bert Huijben wrote:
> > What if the child was moved to a different location than its parent?
> >
> > $ svn mv A/child B/child
> > $ svn mv A new_A
> >
> > $ svn up .
> > Receives update fo
> -Original Message-
> From: Philip Martin [mailto:philip.mar...@wandisco.com]
> Sent: dinsdag 18 oktober 2011 12:10
> To: dev@subversion.apache.org
> Cc: comm...@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: svn commit: r1185242 -
> /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_subr/sqlite.c
>
> rhuij...@
On 10/11/2011 06:05 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> INSTALL links to subversion.tigris.org for downloading the BDB and
> libintl binaries.
>
> What should we do with those links? Do we continue to maintain those
> files on subversion.tigris.org, or on archive.apache.org, or somewhere
> else?
We "cont
On 10/18/2011 09:50 AM, Jurij Čakardič wrote:
> I did some research by enabling logging on the Subversion server, when the
> developer connects to the SVN server through Oracle JDeveloper a request is
> formed incorrectly or at least in a strange manner:
>
> 2060 2011-10-18T13:03:12.893457Z 172.16
Philip Martin writes:
> What I propose is that copy only produces the incomplete state for nodes
> that are copies (or copies of copies) of repository nodes. Copy would
> not produce the incomplete state for copies of added nodes. When an
> added node is copied the copy is an added note complet
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 8:13 AM, Hyrum K Wright
wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Hyrum K Wright
> wrote:
>> I know that 1.7.0 is less than 24 hours old at this point, but it's
>> been a couple of week since the magic revision, and we've already
>> started to collect various merged items
A number of users have reported upgrade problems like:
TortoiseSVN-1.7.0\ext\subversion\subversion\libsvn_wc\entries.c' line 1935:
assertion failed (svn_checksum_match(entry_md5_checksum, found_md5_checksum))
As far as I can see this means that the 1.6 working copy is corrupt
because the text-ba
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 5:54 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 11:21:16AM -0700, Paul Burba wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 6:36 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>> > On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 03:05:11PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>> >> So while I think your fixes should be backpo
C. Michael Pilato wrote on Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 08:57:39 -0400:
> On 10/11/2011 06:05 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > INSTALL links to subversion.tigris.org for downloading the BDB and
> > libintl binaries.
> >
> > What should we do with those links? Do we continue to maintain those
> > files on sub
Hey Brane,
thanks for your reply.
Yes, the answer was obvious and we have found it. Or at least obvious to
somebody who is familiar with the project's source-code. To somebody new to
the code it isn't always easy to find what you are looking for, when you are
looking at - gosh, I don't even know ho
On 18.10.2011 18:32, Fabian Angelstorf wrote:
> Hey Brane,
> thanks for your reply.
> Yes, the answer was obvious and we have found it. Or at least obvious to
> somebody who is familiar with the project's source-code.
Well, I've not been too familiar with SVN code for quite a few years
now. So my
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 09:41, wrote:
>...
> +++ subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_subr/mergeinfo.c Tue Oct 18 13:41:48
> 2011
>...
> @@ -1639,8 +1640,8 @@ svn_mergeinfo__equals(svn_boolean_t *is_
> if (apr_hash_count(info1) == apr_hash_count(info2))
> {
> svn_mergeinfo_t deleted, a
[Adding dev@s.a.o as I think this is a bug in the Subversion code,
although I don't know enough to be sure.]
Jean-Daniel Dupas writes:
>> Le 18 oct. 2011 à 18:39, Jean-Daniel Dupas a écrit:
>>
>>> After upgrading to svn 1.7, I encounter some very annoying issues.
>>> I have a web server with th
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 4:51 PM, wrote:
> Author: rhuijben
> Date: Tue Oct 18 21:51:42 2011
> New Revision: 1185894
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1185894&view=rev
> Log:
> * STATUS: Nominate r1185886 group for 1.7.1
>
> Modified:
> subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS
>
> Modified: sub
Greg,
If you have some time to spare, could you please review this patch?
I don't think we have a lot of svn_wc_entry_t experts that can review this
patch at short notice. This to allow getting it in 1.7.1.
Thanks,
Bert
> -Original Message-
> From: rhuij...@apache.org [
> -Original Message-
> From: Hyrum K Wright [mailto:hyrum.wri...@wandisco.com]
> Sent: dinsdag 18 oktober 2011 23:58
> To: dev@subversion.apache.org
> Cc: comm...@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: svn commit: r1185894 - /subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS
> > + * r1185738, r1185763, r11
Hi,
With the current stream of user reports of a few specific upgrade problems
Hyrum intends to cut a Subversion 1.7.1 soon.
I would like to see the following patches that are in STATUS to go in, but
they need more votes:
* r1185242: Trivial patch that resolves a common concurrency probl
Sure. Thanks for the heads up. I'll take a look and respond "good" or
with comments...
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 18:08, Bert Huijben wrote:
> Greg,
>
> If you have some time to spare, could you please review this patch?
>
> I don't think we have a lot of svn_wc_entry_t experts that can revie
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 7:20 PM, Bert Huijben wrote:
> Hi,
>
> With the current stream of user reports of a few specific upgrade problems
> Hyrum intends to cut a Subversion 1.7.1 soon.
>
> I would like to see the following patches that are in STATUS to go in, but
> they need more votes:
>
22 matches
Mail list logo
