Paul Burba wrote on 2012-01-11:
A random thought about your patch: The skip/stop logic kicks in when
performing a cherry pick merge. It might be better if it only applies
when doing sync merges. Reasoning: If a user explicitly states the
revisions she wants to merge, I think we should
Branko Čibej wrote:
On 18.01.2012 23:37, Julian Foad wrote:
[...] there are certain simple
changes that the three-way text merge function will detect as looks
like that change has already been made here and auto-resolve it as a
no-op, but that's beside the point.
I don't think it's
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Paul Burba ptbu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 8:28 PM, Hyrum K Wright
hyrum.wri...@wandisco.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 5:51 PM, Paul Burba ptbu...@gmail.com wrote:
...
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Hyrum K Wright
On 19.01.2012 15:38, Julian Foad wrote:
Branko Čibej wrote:
Instead of trying to invent ways to not make current reintegrate suck
rocks, I'd suggest taking a look at how other tools handle such repeated
merges between branches. Specifically, since git afficionados have so
much to say about
Summary: There seems to be no public specification (other than the
source code) on what makes a valid Subversion property name. Subversion
property name validation is implemented differently on various clients,
including official clients. I request that the Subversion property
name
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 8:40 PM, Daniel Shahaf danie...@elego.de wrote:
hwri...@apache.org wrote on Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 20:56:35 -:
Author: hwright
Date: Thu Jan 19 20:56:35 2012
New Revision: 1233566
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1233566view=rev
Log:
Add a public wrapper
Hyrum K Wright wrote on Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 21:47:51 -0600:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 8:40 PM, Daniel Shahaf danie...@elego.de wrote:
I do wonder if the to disk threshold should be in the public
signature, but don't have offhand a use-case justifying that.
We could, but I figured callers
On Jan 19, 2012 11:02 PM, Daniel Shahaf danie...@elego.de wrote:
Hyrum K Wright wrote on Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 21:47:51 -0600:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 8:40 PM, Daniel Shahaf danie...@elego.de
wrote:
I do wonder if the to disk threshold should be in the public
signature, but don't have
8 matches
Mail list logo
