2012/2/9 Markus Schaber m.scha...@3s-software.com:
Hi,
Von: Stefan Sperling [mailto:s...@elego.de]
On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 12:20:14AM +0900, Hiroaki Nakamura wrote:
[Upgrade options / backwards compatibility for proposed unicode
normalization fix]
- Need to re-checkout existing working
Hi,
2012/2/9 Thomas Åkesson tho...@akesson.cc:
Hi,
I have been interested in this issue for a couple of years and I remember it
was discussed briefly at Subconf in Germany a couple of years ago.
Branching the thread here because I'd like to propose a different approach
than Hiroaki. This
On 11.02.2012 13:05, Hiroaki Nakamura wrote:
2012/2/9 Markus Schaber m.scha...@3s-software.com:
Hi,
Von: Stefan Sperling [mailto:s...@elego.de]
On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 12:20:14AM +0900, Hiroaki Nakamura wrote:
[Upgrade options / backwards compatibility for proposed unicode
normalization
2012/2/11 Branko Čibej br...@apache.org:
On 11.02.2012 13:05, Hiroaki Nakamura wrote:
2012/2/9 Markus Schaber m.scha...@3s-software.com:
Von: Stefan Sperling [mailto:s...@elego.de]
On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 12:20:14AM +0900, Hiroaki Nakamura wrote:
[Upgrade options / backwards compatibility for
Hyrum K Wright hyrum.wri...@wandisco.com writes:
At long last, here are the 1.7.3 tarballs for testing and signing:
http://people.apache.org/~hwright/svn/1.7.3/
I'm getting intermittent failures in check-swig-rb on Ubuntu 10.04.
Some runs complete without error and some produce errors (not
Philip Martin philip.mar...@wandisco.com writes:
Hyrum K Wright hyrum.wri...@wandisco.com writes:
At long last, here are the 1.7.3 tarballs for testing and signing:
http://people.apache.org/~hwright/svn/1.7.3/
I'm getting intermittent failures in check-swig-rb on Ubuntu 10.04.
Some runs
Summary:
+1 to release
Platform:
Linux (Debian/squeeze and Ubuntu/10.04)
Tested:
(local, svn, svn+sasl, serf, neon) x (fsfs, fsfs/pack/shard, bdb)
(serf/v1, neon/v1) x (fsfs, bdb)
swig-pl, swig-py, swig-rb
javahl x (fsfs, bdb)
Results:
All tests PASS
Local dependencies
On 10.02.2012 12:21, Branko Čibej wrote:
On 07.02.2012 22:24, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
On 07.02.2012 00:41, Greg Stein wrote:
In most data storage mechanisms for the repository, inheritable
properties are a performance killer.
I'm not sure that this is actually applicable to SVN
for two
On 09.02.2012 16:05, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
stef...@apache.org wrote on Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 00:44:26 -:
Author: stefan2
Date: Wed Feb 8 00:44:26 2012
New Revision: 1241718
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1241718view=rev
Log:
Major improvement in delta window handling: Cache
Stefan Fuhrmann wrote on Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 03:06:31 +0100:
On 09.02.2012 16:05, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
stef...@apache.org wrote on Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 00:44:26 -:
Author: stefan2
Date: Wed Feb 8 00:44:26 2012
New Revision: 1241718
URL:
On 12.02.2012 02:52, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
The silly part of FSFS is that it does not optimize access
paths, yet, but stores changes individually. The challenge
is our two-dimensional key space and the fact that different
operations traverse the data along different dimensions
(e.g. log ./.
11 matches
Mail list logo