Re: svn commit: r1293766 - /subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS

stevek...@apache.org wrote on Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 07:47:02 -: > + * r1235831, r1236099 > +  Tweak the parsing of the ssl-authority-files config option to make it > +  easier for users to configure. > +  Justification: > +    Low impact change to help users. > +  Notes: > +    Bot

Re: r1293998 Re: buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on svn-x64-centos-gcc

Daniel Shahaf wrote: > build...@apache.org wrote: >> The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder svn-x64-centos-gcc while >> building ASF Buildbot. >> Full details are available at: >>   http://ci.apache.org/builders/svn-x64-centos-gcc/builds/5634 >> ... >> Build Source Stamp: [branch s

Re: svn commit: r1293998 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_repos/replay.c

Daniel Shahaf wrote: >> danie...@apache.org wrote: >> > Fix issue #4121: svnsync of a copy followed by delete of >> > was-unreadable child. >> > http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4121 >> > >> > * subversion/libsvn_repos/replay.c >> >  (was_readable): New helper. >> >  (

Re: svn commit: r1293998 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_repos/replay.c

Daniel Shahaf writes: > I am also attaching an attempt at an equivalent Python test. For me the > Python test passes against r1293997. Can anyone spot the difference? The Python test uses ra_local to access the source repo, so no authz. -- uberSVN: Apache Subversion Made Easy http://www.uber

Re: svn commit: r1293998 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_repos/replay.c

Philip Martin writes: > Daniel Shahaf writes: > >> I am also attaching an attempt at an equivalent Python test. For me the >> Python test passes against r1293997. Can anyone spot the difference? > > The Python test uses ra_local to access the source repo, so no authz. No, I'm wrong. ra_local

Re: svn commit: r1293766 - /subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS

On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 09:40:57AM +, Julian Foad wrote: > stevek...@apache.org wrote on Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 07:47:02 -: > > > + * r1235831, r1236099 > > +  Tweak the parsing of the ssl-authority-files config option to make it > > +  easier for users to configure. > > +  Justificat

Re: 1.7.4 start of march?

On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 01:00:53PM -0500, Greg Stein wrote: > On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 12:14, Hyrum K Wright > wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 12:38 PM, C. Michael Pilato > > wrote: > >>> Would people be happy with this? > >> > >> I'm happy with this. > > > > As am I. > > OK then. With som

Re: r1293998 Re: buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on svn-x64-centos-gcc

Julian Foad wrote on Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 10:13:31 +: > Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > > build...@apache.org wrote: > >> The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder svn-x64-centos-gcc > >> while > >> building ASF Buildbot. > >> Full details are available at: > >>   http://ci.apache.org/bu

Re: AW: SQLite locking for WCNG on NFS

Branko Čibej writes: > All of these scenarios assume there is a mechanism that determines > whether simultaneous access to the working copy by two threads of > control is actually happening or not. You say that the only possible > such mechanism is "the user". Nonsense. > > We're already relegati

Symmetric Merge -- Wiki page

As many of you are aware I've been looking at improving merge in various ways.  I'd like to ask for feedback at this stage on the Wiki page (renamed from SvnMergeTheory).  The essential point is that it looks like we can relatively easily enhan

Re: svn commit: r1293998 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_repos/replay.c

Julian Foad wrote on Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 10:19:35 +: > Daniel Shahaf wrote: > >> danie...@apache.org wrote: > >> > Fix issue #4121: svnsync of a copy followed by delete of > >> > was-unreadable child. > >> > http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4121 > >> > > >> > * subver

Re: Conflict on identical binary files

Welcome aboard Markus. There were a few issues with this patch: * No log message * A typo in the docstring * A comment about binary props that didn't match the code below it * No issue number for a new XFail test They were easy to fix, and the patch itself was good, so I've fixed them myself and

Re: svn commit: r1293766 - /subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS

On 02/27/2012 06:22 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 09:40:57AM +, Julian Foad wrote: >> For reference, r1235831's log message is: >> >> > Improve the handling of the ssl-authority-files config option: >> > allow leading and trailing whitespace on the filenames to make >

Re: Conflict on identical binary files

For the record, I also moved the test to the end of the test_list, per a request on IRC. That avoids renumbering all existing tests.

Re: svn commit: r1294276 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_delta/compat.c

That initialization doesn't need to happen. The only time that CHILDREN is referenced, it has also been initialized within the code. Just follow the values for NEED_ADD and KIND. On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 14:05, wrote: > Author: hwright > Date: Mon Feb 27 19:05:47 2012 > New Revision: 1294276 > >

Re: [RFC] Inheritable Properties

On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 12:31 PM, Branko Čibej wrote: > On 16.02.2012 16:46, C. Michael Pilato wrote: >> On 02/16/2012 05:50 AM, Branko Čibej wrote: >>> On 15.02.2012 21:18, Greg Stein wrote: And thinking on that: how does the client do inheritance in a mixed-revision working copy? D@10

Re: [RFC] Inheritable Properties

On 28.02.2012 00:20, Paul Burba wrote: > On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 12:31 PM, Branko Čibej wrote: >> On 16.02.2012 16:46, C. Michael Pilato wrote: >>> On 02/16/2012 05:50 AM, Branko Čibej wrote: On 15.02.2012 21:18, Greg Stein wrote: > And thinking on that: how does the client do inheritance

Re: MTime resurrected

On 2012-02-21 4:29 AM, Julian Foad wrote: Rick, thanks for that! I haven't read it yet but I've put it up at: Has anybody had the time to read this yet? -Rick-

Re: buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on svn-x64-ubuntu-gcc

Looks like some Java change on the build save? On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 18:03, wrote: > The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder svn-x64-ubuntu-gcc while > building ASF Buildbot. > Full details are available at: >  http://ci.apache.org/builders/svn-x64-ubuntu-gcc/builds/4452 > > Buildb

[l10n] Translation status report for trunk r1294454

Translation status report for trunk@r1294454 lang trans untrans fuzzy obs -- de2080 192 309 273 UUooo es2006 266 386 407 ++UUU~ fr2272 0

Re: buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on svn-x64-ubuntu-gcc

Yep. The script should now point to the correct JDK location. -Hyrum On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 10:02 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > Looks like some Java change on the build save? > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 18:03,   wrote: >> The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder svn-x64-ubuntu-gcc while >

Re: svn commit: r1294455 - /subversion/trunk/tools/buildbot/slaves/ubuntu-x64/svnbuild.sh

On 2/27/12 8:32 PM, hwri...@apache.org wrote: Author: hwright Date: Tue Feb 28 04:32:21 2012 New Revision: 1294455 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1294455&view=rev Log: * tools/buildbot/slaves/ubuntu-x64/svnbuild.sh: Update configure args to reflect new java version. Modified: sub

Re: svn commit: r1294455 - /subversion/trunk/tools/buildbot/slaves/ubuntu-x64/svnbuild.sh

On 2/27/12 8:34 PM, Blair Zajac wrote: On 2/27/12 8:32 PM, hwri...@apache.org wrote: Author: hwright Date: Tue Feb 28 04:32:21 2012 New Revision: 1294455 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1294455&view=rev Log: * tools/buildbot/slaves/ubuntu-x64/svnbuild.sh: Update configure args to reflect