[[[
Index: subversion/bindings/swig/python/svn/fs.py
===
--- subversion/bindings/swig/python/svn/fs.py (revision 1301511)
+++ subversion/bindings/swig/python/svn/fs.py (working copy)
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ from libsvn.fs import *
from
On 17.03.2012 14:06, Stephen Butler wrote:
> On Mar 17, 2012, at 13:43 , Branko Čibej wrote:
>
>> On 17.03.2012 11:25, Stephen Butler wrote:
> Somewhat off-topic, but "svn update" has the serious problem that it's
> impossible to revert to the state before the update if one had local
>
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Stephen Butler wrote:
> On Mar 17, 2012, at 1:14 , Johan Corveleyn wrote:
[...]
>> Don't git and mercurial and others just apply the changes to wherever
>> the code moved to, regardless of the container? Do those users often
>> complain about that behavior? (I d
On Mar 17, 2012, at 13:43 , Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 17.03.2012 11:25, Stephen Butler wrote:
Somewhat off-topic, but "svn update" has the serious problem that it's
impossible to revert to the state before the update if one had local
changes. Most of these "pick sane defaults" kinds
On 17.03.2012 11:25, Stephen Butler wrote:
>>> Somewhat off-topic, but "svn update" has the serious problem that it's
>>> impossible to revert to the state before the update if one had local
>>> changes. Most of these "pick sane defaults" kinds of discussions would
>>> become moot if one could have
Hi, all. GSOC2012 Accepted organizations has been announced[1.] We're
very happy to see Apache Software Foundation is also on the list. It
means that Subversion is also accepted for this GSOC.
Congratulations!
As a GSOC student on Subversion, I have begun to prepare just one
month ago, and intere
On Mar 17, 2012, at 1:14 , Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 10:40 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> On 16.03.2012 15:50, Stephen Butler wrote:
>>> Some users do want more control over update (i.e., they trust
>>> Subversion less). Interactive resolution during or after update is an
>>>
7 matches
Mail list logo
