Bostjan Skufca wrote on Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 21:48:36 +0200:
> I am hitting this issue with 1.7.6:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/subversion-dev/201205.mbox/%3C20120502131732.GB10429@EbonHawk%3E
>
> Configure command:
> ./configure --prefix=$PDESTDIR_SVN \
> --with-apr=/usr/local/apr
>From IRC:
brane: hm … i don't really understand. it does look like i'll have to install
vcexpress 2008 if i want to check what's going on. buildbot logs are less than
useful. sigh.
[1:58pm] danielsh: philipm: moderating you through to announce@
[1:59pm] philipm: thanks!
[2:01pm] philipm: brane:
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> From IRC:
>
> brane: hm … i don't really understand. it does look like i'll have to install
> vcexpress 2008 if i want to check what's going on. buildbot logs are less
> than useful. sigh.
> [1:58pm] danielsh: philipm: moderating you throug
Thanks for that reminder! mphippard, pburba and I were just talking about
this yesterday as something we want to do for 1.8.
http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4124 tracks this request.
On 08/15/2012 04:07 PM, Cedric JP. Brasey wrote:
> Please please please. Can we make the clien
I've been looking at the compressed-pristines branch and I don't think
there's any chance it could be ready for 1.8; just thought I'd point
this out because compressed-pristines are listed in the 1.8 roadmap.
-- Brane
--
Certified & Supported Apache Subversion Downloads:
http://www.wandisco.com/
Trying to revive an old thread...
Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Markus Schaber wrote on Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 08:09:30 +:
>> There are two other cases we should define a rule for:
>>
>> 1) Clients like SharpSVN or TortoiseSVN, or distribution builds, when
>> they include their own patches, or backport
On 15.08.2012 18:21, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
Hello, all.
Echoing in the back of my head are promises we devs have made to avoid long
release cycles, and 1.7.0 recently turned 10 months old. There are a few
ongoing bits of feature work happening on branches or in various states of
completion on
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 10:10 AM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> So, incorporating some of the great suggestions on this thread so far, but
> adding some of my own, I'd like to reset this design discussion with the
> following proposal:
>
># Reports the general name of the client.
>#
># E
Just my two pence worth...
>From a hooking point; I would have to say that i would only really care about
>what the client level is. For example. On pre-commit i would like to know if
>the client is at least 1.7, so that I can then reject the commit. I can't
>imagine, for the mo anywa
Mark Phippard wrote on Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 10:18:13 -0400:
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 10:10 AM, C. Michael Pilato
> wrote:
>
> > So, incorporating some of the great suggestions on this thread so far, but
> > adding some of my own, I'd like to reset this design discussion with the
> > following p
C. Michael Pilato wrote on Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 10:10:49 -0400:
># Reports the general name of the client.
>#
># Examples: "svn", "tortoisesvn", "svnkit"
>#
># Default value: "svn".
>#
>client-name=[-_a-zA-Z0-9]+
I suggest the libsvn_client default be different from wha
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 9:21 AM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> PS: Is it safe to assume that "commit shelving/checkpointing" is *not*
> going to happen for 1.8? ;-)
I want to work on this functionality but don't think my time will free
up to work on it for at least another few weeks if not a month
Sorry about this but could I possibly throw something else into the mix?
What would the chances be of close folder/readonly function being introduced?
Currently i have implemented a hook that looks for a specific property on the
folder and if it is present then the commit is rejected. The rea
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Cedric JP. Brasey
wrote:
> Just my two pence worth...
>
>
>
> From a hooking point; I would have to say that i would only really care
> about what the client level is. For example. On pre-commit i would like to
> know if the client is at least 1.7, so that I can th
I filed this as issue #4219, 'svn delete fails with "403 Forbidden" if root is
not readable'.
With Philip's help we determined this bug only occurs with RA-neon. I can now
reproduce it on 1.7.x.
I looked into why Dmitry's patch doesn't work. It calls
svn_uri_condense_targets(), which finds
On 08/16/2012 10:50 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> C. Michael Pilato wrote on Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 10:10:49 -0400:
>># Reports the general name of the client.
>>#
>># Examples: "svn", "tortoisesvn", "svnkit"
>>#
>># Default value: "svn".
>>#
>>client-name=[-_a-zA-Z0-9]+
>
>
Following editor v2 (and v1), deletion of a child is changing the list of
children in the parent directory and as such requires (at least) write access
to the parent.
What happens if paths to within multiple repositories are passed to the
function? Was/is this supported?
Should the dele
On 16 August 2012 15:57, Cedric JP. Brasey
wrote:
> Sorry about this but could I possibly throw something else into the mix?
>
>
> What would the chances be of close folder/readonly function being
> introduced? Currently i have implemented a hook that looks for a specific
> property on the folder
C. Michael Pilato wrote on Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 12:11:56 -0400:
> On 08/16/2012 10:50 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > C. Michael Pilato wrote on Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 10:10:49 -0400:
> >># Reports the general name of the client.
> >>#
> >># Examples: "svn", "tortoisesvn", "svnkit"
> >>#
Bert Huijben wrote:
> Following editor v2 (and v1), deletion of a child is changing the
> list of children in the parent directory and as such requires (at
> least) write access to the parent.
The editors don't control authorization. The parent path may be
mentioned in an editor call, but that do
Forwarding bug report (with patch) to dev@
- Forwarded message from Roman Plessl -
> Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 09:48:32 +0200 (CEST)
> From: Roman Plessl
> To: us...@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Issues building svn 1.7.6 in non apache mode (module mod_dontdothat)
> Message-ID:
>
> Hi
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 12:21 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> Hello, all.
>
> Echoing in the back of my head are promises we devs have made to avoid long
> release cycles, and 1.7.0 recently turned 10 months old. There are a few
> ongoing bits of feature work happening on branches or in various st
On Aug 16, 2012 9:43 AM, "Mat Booth" wrote:
> Aren't you able to do this with path-based authorisation?
Or a commit hook if you really want to use properties.
23 matches
Mail list logo
