From the issue[1] description,
When svndumpfilter exclude command accepts path prefixes starting with either
/
or just , I expect it to work the same way when we use with --targets
option.
For Eg :
Both of the following command works fine when we directly provide the
path prefix
$ cat samp
On 25.09.2012 17:10, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 11:01:44AM -0400, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>> On 09/25/2012 10:42 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
>>> On 25.09.2012 16:37, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
+1 on the optional libproxy dependency. That makes great sense to me.
How
Stefan Sperling writes:
> There is one remaining failure on 1.7.x within a format 30 working copy.
>
> The failing test is stat_tests 19, which tests 'svn status' on an
> unversioned directory. On 1.7.x, it uses sbox.repos_dir as an unversioned
> directory. This fails as we traverse upwards and f
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 11:01:44AM -0400, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> On 09/25/2012 10:42 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> > On 25.09.2012 16:37, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> >> +1 on the optional libproxy dependency. That makes great sense to me.
> >>
> >> However ... since the env-var stuff is *relatively
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Stefan Fuhrmann
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 7:13 PM, Johan Corveleyn
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Heh, next question: what are those "slow places" mainly, and do you
> >> have any ideas to speed those up a
Johan Corveleyn writes:
> On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Stefan Fuhrmann
>> Another thing is that svnserve would be just fine for many
>> use-cases if only it had decent SSPI / ldap support. But
>> that is something we simply need to code. Power users
>> inside a LAN may then use svnserve and m
There is one remaining failure on 1.7.x within a format 30 working copy.
The failing test is stat_tests 19, which tests 'svn status' on an
unversioned directory. On 1.7.x, it uses sbox.repos_dir as an unversioned
directory. This fails as we traverse upwards and find the 1.7.x working
copy, where w
On 09/25/2012 10:42 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 25.09.2012 16:37, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>> +1 on the optional libproxy dependency. That makes great sense to me.
>>
>> However ... since the env-var stuff is *relatively* straightforward, would
>> we be interested in/willing to *also* implement t
On 25.09.2012 16:37, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> On 09/17/2012 09:34 PM, Bert Huijben wrote:
>> On Windows this isn't the normal way to fetch the system wide proxy, nor
>> is it on the Mac. Adding environment flags to GUI applications there is
>> certainly *not* the right way to look at this problem
On 09/17/2012 09:34 PM, Bert Huijben wrote:
> On Windows this isn't the normal way to fetch the system wide proxy, nor
> is it on the Mac. Adding environment flags to GUI applications there is
> certainly *not* the right way to look at this problem. The linux specific
> environment variable solutio
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Stefan Fuhrmann
wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 7:13 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 2:27 PM, wrote:
>> > Author: stefan2
>> > Date: Sat Sep 22 12:27:49 2012
>> > New Revision: 1388786
>> >
>> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=138
Hyrum K Wright writes:
> Incidentally, I'm still seeing swig-pl build errors on that bot. From
> reading above, I thought these were addressed. Is that correct?
The latest failure is on the 1.7 branch which doesn't have the swig-pl
patch from trunk.
--
Certified & Supported Apache Subversion
Done!
Ethan Cane wrote on Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 11:19:03 +0100:
> EthanCane
>
> On 25 Sep 2012, at 09:40, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>
> > What's your wiki username?
> >
> > Ethan Cane wrote on Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 15:05:57 +0100:
> >> Just registered, many thanks.
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 12:29 AM, Ben Reser wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 8:27 PM, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
>> For the time being, the Ruby build step and tests have been commented
>> out of the relevant scripts.
>>
>> I think there is value in running a bot on a stock (albeit currently
>> beta)
Philip Martin writes:
> Hyrum K Wright writes:
>
>> I've spent the evening digging into what it would take to support Ruby
>> 1.9, but my Ruby-fu is so weak that it'll be more than an evening for
>> me to actually make progress on the issue. I invite more capable
>> hands to join in the effort.
What's your wiki username?
Ethan Cane wrote on Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 15:05:57 +0100:
> Just registered, many thanks.
Hyrum K Wright writes:
> I've spent the evening digging into what it would take to support Ruby
> 1.9, but my Ruby-fu is so weak that it'll be more than an evening for
> me to actually make progress on the issue. I invite more capable
> hands to join in the effort.
There were patches submitted
On 25.09.2012 04:39, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 7:26 PM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 10:03 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>>> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 01:50:36PM -0400, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
That's correct.
And Philip, I see this as really two i
18 matches
Mail list logo
