This is a new test on some update of symlink behavior.
There should be a real change committed in that test, so not seeing it on
update (the reported error) indicates that there is some bug in previously
untested behavior.
(It could be an error in the test, but the testcase is not really
On second thought, it is probably caused by the sylink not changing
filesize while we have wait for timestamps disabled in the testsuite.
That would exactly change this behavior on the specific buildbot.
Bert
*From:* Bert Huijben b...@qqmail.nl
*Sent:* November 10, 2012 11:26 AM
*To:* Philip
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 11:37 PM, Branko Čibej br...@wandisco.com wrote:
That would imply that, if content-length doesn't get set on a HEAD
response, but Transfer-Encoding: chunked does, then everything is
correct, right? If somewhat inefficient.
The chunked header is only sent on non-HEAD
Hi Mark,
on www.apachehaus.com there are zips for 2.2.x and 2.4.x
Cheers
Mario
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 6:49 AM, Justin Erenkrantz jus...@erenkrantz.comwrote:
There is a C-L header...so, I don't know what the original poster is
seeing, but we're already doing the right thing... -- justin
I bet the OP is trying to do HEAD on a directory as there was talk
elsethread about
On Thursday 08 November 2012 04:10 PM, vijay wrote:
On Wednesday 07 November 2012 08:19 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 07:54:33PM +0530, vijay wrote:
Thanks stefan for your detailed review.
I will keep in mind all your review comments. I will correct my
mistakes in future
Bert Huijben b...@qqmail.nl writes:
On second thought, it is probably caused by the sylink not changing
filesize while we have wait for timestamps disabled in the testsuite.
That would exactly change this behavior on the specific buildbot.
That sounds right. I've made the commit before the
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 3:14 AM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
Now, I have pinpointed the exact revision where the problems start for
me. It's r1338286, where Bert enabled whole program optimizations for
release builds, in the vcnet_vcxproj.ezt file.
Maybe I'm running into
Thanks Justin for clarifying.
On 10 nov 2012, at 12:54, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 6:49 AM, Justin Erenkrantz jus...@erenkrantz.com
wrote:
There is a C-L header...so, I don't know what the original poster is seeing,
but we're already doing the right thing... -- justin
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Thomas Åkesson tho...@akesson.cc wrote:
I suppose this means that it would be a significant optimization to
perform HEAD rather than GET when discovering ACLs for every subdirectory
in a directory listing?
Probably - doing the HEAD request will run the full
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 15:35:21 +0100:
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 3:14 AM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
Now, I have pinpointed the exact revision where the problems start for
me. It's r1338286, where Bert enabled whole program optimizations for
11 matches
Mail list logo
