Hi,
I just tried svnsyncing the chromium repository to my local machine
(Subversion 1.8.0, standard SlikSvn binary) on Windows and the svnsync
process didn't get above 86 MB memory usage syncing the first 563 revisions.
This was a sync to a local harddisk.
The number of open
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 6:01 PM, Stefan Fuhrmann
stefan.fuhrm...@wandisco.com wrote:
All that said, it may still be necessary or at least be useful
to retry opening any FSFS file (in case of network glitches
etc.). Because there opening files should never fail as part
of the normal
Ok, problem with the monitoring.
The peak for the first 1600 revisions was about 586 MB.
Bert
From: Bert Huijben [mailto:b...@qqmail.nl]
Sent: donderdag 18 juli 2013 09:23
To: 'Anatoly Zapadinsky'; 'Lieven Govaerts'
Cc: 'Subversion Development'
Subject: RE: svnsync
I've just tried this at home using console apps from tortoise
distributive (1.8.0 r1490375). Computer is running Windows2003Server
32bit version.
svncync already allocated 660 Mb transmitting file data for the 5th
revision. Memory is deallocated after every new revision is
transferred, so it is
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 11:26 AM, Anatoly Zapadinsky
zapadin...@gmail.comwrote:
I've just tried this at home using console apps from tortoise
distributive (1.8.0 r1490375). Computer is running Windows2003Server
32bit version.
I can't reproduce this on LINUX. I will run this later today on
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Stefan Fuhrmann
stefan.fuhrm...@wandisco.com wrote:
Have you tried it with any newer Windows version (post-W2k3)?
There might be an address space fragmentation issue between
CRT and OS memory management.
Yes. I've tried it on Ubuntu 12.08 (1.8 subversion was
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Anatoly Zapadinsky zapadin...@gmail.comwrote:
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Stefan Fuhrmann
stefan.fuhrm...@wandisco.com wrote:
Have you tried it with any newer Windows version (post-W2k3)?
There might be an address space fragmentation issue between
Does the memory usage already build up while transmitting the
data (i.e. while the dots are being shown) or mainly during the
commit stage, i.e. the during short delay after the last dot and
the Committed revision xyz message?
On transmitting data stage. During the commit almost no
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 4:08 PM, Anatoly Zapadinsky zapadin...@gmail.comwrote:
Does the memory usage already build up while transmitting the
data (i.e. while the dots are being shown) or mainly during the
commit stage, i.e. the during short delay after the last dot and
the Committed
I see smaller numbers on my 64-bit Linux box. r18 is the worst at about
550MB.
Anatoly Zapadinsky zapadin...@gmail.com writes:
I've just tried this at home using console apps from tortoise
distributive (1.8.0 r1490375). Computer is running Windows2003Server
32bit version.
svncync already
I see those values with 1.8.x but the problem appears to be fixed on
trunk where the memory use is remains more or less constant at 100MB
virtual, 25MB resident.
Philip Martin philip.mar...@wandisco.com writes:
I see smaller numbers on my 64-bit Linux box. r18 is the worst at about
550MB.
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 7:27 AM, Ben Reser b...@reser.org wrote:
The 1.7.11 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing.
Please get the tarballs from
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
and add your signatures there. I plan to try and release on July
23rd so
12 matches
Mail list logo
