On 2014-01-13 03:51:08 +0100, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 13.01.2014 03:43, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > I meant deltas like in the repository (but see below).
>
> When you say "delta" you have to also define "against what". Otherwise
> it's just a not very efficient compression algorithm.
Against ano
On 13.01.2014 03:43, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2014-01-11 22:38:51 +0100, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> On 11.01.2014 10:30, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
>>> Moreover if you want to speed up things, keeping pristines may not
>>> be the right way (in particular if the whole files are kept, not
>>> deltas).
>>
On 2014-01-11 22:38:51 +0100, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 11.01.2014 10:30, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > Moreover if you want to speed up things, keeping pristines may not
> > be the right way (in particular if the whole files are kept, not
> > deltas).
>
> FWIW, you can't reasonably store pristines as
1.8.0@1492600 vs. trunk@1557601
Started at Mon Jan 13 00:27:28 UTC 2014
*DISCLAIMER* - This tests only file://-URL access on a GNU/Linux VM.
This is intended to measure changes in performance of the local working
copy layer, *only*. These results are *not* generally true for everyone.
Charts of t
Dear SVN developers,
I recently switched to Subversion trunk (revision 1556806) in order to
play with another problem and later unexpectedly stumbled upon the
following error:
svn: E235000: In file 'subversion/libsvn_ra_serf/util.c' line :
assertion failed (handler->server_error == NULL)
Abor
On 1/10/14, 11:22 PM, Ben Reser wrote:
> On 1/10/14, 4:19 AM, Philip Martin wrote:
>> It is not fixed. If you look a few lines down we pass a NULL path:
>>
>> apr_text_append(resource->pool, option,
>> dav_svn__build_uri(resource->info->repos,
>>
6 matches
Mail list logo
