Re: svn commit: r1616338 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_fs_fs/fs.c

2014-08-13 Thread Stefan Fuhrmann
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 6:41 PM, Stefan Sperling s...@elego.de wrote: On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 06:35:09PM +0200, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote: On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 10:59 PM, Stefan Sperling s...@elego.de wrote: @@ -245,6 +245,16 @@ initialize_fs_struct(svn_fs_t *fs) return SVN_NO_ERROR;

Re: svn commit: r1617108 - /subversion/branches/authzperf/subversion/libsvn_repos/authz.c

2014-08-13 Thread Stefan Fuhrmann
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 8:02 PM, Branko Čibej br...@wandisco.com wrote: On 11.08.2014 18:37, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote: On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 7:05 PM, Branko Čibej br...@wandisco.com wrote: On 10.08.2014 18:57, Branko Čibej wrote: FWIW, you should even have the get_memberships function

Re: svn commit: r1617148 - /subversion/branches/authzperf/subversion/libsvn_repos/authz.c

2014-08-13 Thread Stefan Fuhrmann
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 2:04 AM, Branko Čibej br...@wandisco.com wrote: On 10.08.2014 21:17, stef...@apache.org wrote: Author: stefan2 Date: Sun Aug 10 19:17:53 2014 New Revision: 1617148 [...] @@ -973,7 +869,11 @@ add_complex_matches(lookup_state_t *stat for (i = 0; i

RE: 1.7.18 up for testing/signing

2014-08-13 Thread Bert Huijben
-Original Message- From: Ivan Zhakov [mailto:i...@visualsvn.com] Sent: maandag 11 augustus 2014 13:06 To: Bert Huijben Cc: Ben Reser; Subversion Development Subject: Re: 1.7.18 up for testing/signing On 11 August 2014 14:54, Bert Huijben b...@qqmail.nl wrote: -Original

Re: Regression in bindings? 1.7/1.8 vs 1.6

2014-08-13 Thread Philip Martin
Stefan Fuhrmann stefan.fuhrm...@wandisco.com writes: The solution seems to be to simply destroy the txn_dir_cache instance at the begin of the commit. That comes at some extra cost but that is still proportional to the size of the commit. There would be no cost to mod_dav_svn since the

Re: [PATCH] allow conflict descriptions with NULL repos_relpaths

2014-08-13 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 08:04:37PM +, Bert Huijben wrote: I don't see a problem with not allowing a repository location, but it doesn't make sense to me to have a revision in that case. You either have both, or have none. If you want to tell that the node didn't exist in a revision it

Re: svn commit: r1617148 - /subversion/branches/authzperf/subversion/libsvn_repos/authz.c

2014-08-13 Thread Branko Čibej
On 13 Aug 2014 10:10, Stefan Fuhrmann stefan.fuhrm...@wandisco.com wrote: On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 2:04 AM, Branko Čibej br...@wandisco.com wrote: On 10.08.2014 21:17, stef...@apache.org wrote: Author: stefan2 Date: Sun Aug 10 19:17:53 2014 New Revision: 1617148 [...] @@ -973,7 +869,11

Re: 1.7.18 up for testing/signing

2014-08-13 Thread Ivan Zhakov
On 13 August 2014 14:16, Bert Huijben b...@qqmail.nl wrote: -Original Message- From: Ivan Zhakov [mailto:i...@visualsvn.com] Sent: maandag 11 augustus 2014 13:06 To: Bert Huijben Cc: Ben Reser; Subversion Development Subject: Re: 1.7.18 up for testing/signing On 11 August 2014

Re: svn commit: r1617108 - /subversion/branches/authzperf/subversion/libsvn_repos/authz.c

2014-08-13 Thread Branko Čibej
On 13.08.2014 10:52, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote: On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 8:02 PM, Branko Čibej br...@wandisco.com mailto:br...@wandisco.com wrote: On 11.08.2014 18:37, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote: On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 7:05 PM, Branko Čibej br...@wandisco.com mailto:br...@wandisco.com

Re: 1.7.18 up for testing/signing

2014-08-13 Thread Branko Čibej
On 13.08.2014 13:38, Ivan Zhakov wrote: On 13 August 2014 14:16, Bert Huijben b...@qqmail.nl wrote: -Original Message- From: Ivan Zhakov [mailto:i...@visualsvn.com] Sent: maandag 11 augustus 2014 13:06 To: Bert Huijben Cc: Ben Reser; Subversion Development Subject: Re: 1.7.18 up

Re: Performance Results on Windows

2014-08-13 Thread Ivan Zhakov
On 23 July 2014 17:19, Stefan Fuhrmann stefan.fuhrm...@wandisco.com wrote: Updated and final results: * svnadmin dump results now included, f6 / f7 is +/-20% * fixed anomaly with ra_serf, results consistent with previous findings 'null-export' tests have been rerun and old results been

Re: Performance Results on Windows

2014-08-13 Thread Stefan Fuhrmann
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 8:21 PM, Ivan Zhakov i...@visualsvn.com wrote: On 23 July 2014 17:19, Stefan Fuhrmann stefan.fuhrm...@wandisco.com wrote: Updated and final results: * svnadmin dump results now included, f6 / f7 is +/-20% * fixed anomaly with ra_serf, results consistent with

Re: Performance Results on Windows

2014-08-13 Thread Mark Phippard
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 4:45 PM, Stefan Fuhrmann stefan.fuhrm...@wandisco.com wrote: It seems that CollabNET and other hosting providers possibly have one of the worst configuration for log-adressing feature. Multiple users access over HTTP to a number of gigabyte-sized repositories (so there

Re: Performance Results on Windows

2014-08-13 Thread Stefan Fuhrmann
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 11:03 PM, Mark Phippard markp...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 4:45 PM, Stefan Fuhrmann stefan.fuhrm...@wandisco.com wrote: It seems that CollabNET and other hosting providers possibly have one of the worst configuration for log-adressing feature.

Re: Regression in bindings? 1.7/1.8 vs 1.6

2014-08-13 Thread Stefan Fuhrmann
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Philip Martin philip.mar...@wandisco.com wrote: Stefan Fuhrmann stefan.fuhrm...@wandisco.com writes: The solution seems to be to simply destroy the txn_dir_cache instance at the begin of the commit. That comes at some extra cost but that is still