On 22.08.2014 01:39, Evgeny Kotkov wrote:
We (Sergey Raevskiy sergey.raevs...@visualsvn.com and I) had some time to
examine the revision property caching feature, and there are some conclusions
that we would like to share. In brief, there are certain conditions when
this
feature can
On 21.08.2014 15:51, s...@apache.org wrote:
Author: stsp
Date: Thu Aug 21 14:51:35 2014
New Revision: 1619418
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1619418
Log:
Fix misreporting of tree conflict victim's node kind, in particular
in cases where the victim is an obstruction.
*
I see this:
../src/subversion/libsvn_wc/deprecated.c: In function 'svn_wc_get_diff_editor6':
../src/subversion/libsvn_wc/deprecated.c:1991:39: warning: parameter
'ignore_ancestry' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-parameter]
It was added in 1569697. Is this bit redundant or is something
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 09:29:27AM -, rhuij...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rhuijben
Date: Fri Aug 22 09:29:27 2014
New Revision: 1619717
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1619717
* subversion/libsvn_wc/conflicts.c
(read_tree_conflict_desc):
Don't
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Sperling [mailto:s...@elego.de]
Sent: vrijdag 22 augustus 2014 11:51
To: dev@subversion.apache.org
Subject: Re: svn commit: r1619717 -
/subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/conflicts.c
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 09:29:27AM -, rhuij...@apache.org
I pointed this out here in Sheffield yesterday when I proposed that we just
rip out revprop caching from 1.8 and trunk, because there's no way to make
it work for the kind of configurations that would need it most (i.e., large
installations with multiple servers and load balancing).
There
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 12:26:12PM +0200, Bert Huijben wrote:
I'm not sure this should even be flagged as a conflict.
However, the victim node kind is wrong.
I think it should say local file delete, ...
(but local, left-src and right-src are all victims)
As already mentioned on IRC, when
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 12:50:40PM +0200, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
Remaining restrictions:
* All processes modifying revprops must use 1.9 or later libraries
or revprop caching cannot be used.
Does this mean that using file:// with 'svn' 1.9, or using svnadmin
or svnlook 1.9, won't be
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 12:57 PM, Stefan Sperling s...@elego.de wrote:
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 12:50:40PM +0200, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
Remaining restrictions:
* All processes modifying revprops must use 1.9 or later libraries
or revprop caching cannot be used.
Does this mean that
-Original Message-
From: Julian Foad [mailto:julianf...@btopenworld.com]
Sent: vrijdag 22 augustus 2014 12:52
To: Philip Martin
Cc: dev@subversion.apache.org; Bert Huijben
Subject: Re: Wunused-but-set-parameter warning in
svn_wc_get_diff_editor6
Philip Martin wrote:
Bert Huijben wrote:
Julian Foad wrote:
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1619452
Log:
Fix the copy-from revision number reported in a diff header. It previously
reported 'nonexistent' instead of the copy-from revision in some cases.
This bug seems to be a regression; 1.8.x releases show
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 01:31:08PM +0200, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
People will get an error if one of the currently released 1.8 server
with revprop caching enabled or svnadmin change a revprop. In
that case, a 1.9 process using revprop caching will error out upon
revprop access.
Local
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Stefan Sperling s...@elego.de wrote:
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 01:31:08PM +0200, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
People will get an error if one of the currently released 1.8 server
with revprop caching enabled or svnadmin change a revprop. In
that case, a 1.9 process
Bert Huijben b...@qqmail.nl writes:
Philip Martin wrote:
../src/subversion/libsvn_wc/deprecated.c: In function
'svn_wc_get_diff_editor6':
../src/subversion/libsvn_wc/deprecated.c:1991:39: warning: parameter
'ignore_ancestry' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-parameter]
It was added
On 22.08.2014 12:56, Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 01:31:08PM +0200, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
People will get an error if one of the currently released 1.8 server
with revprop caching enabled or svnadmin change a revprop. In
that case, a 1.9 process using revprop caching will
The 'ignore_ancestry' flag should probably be passed to
svn_wc__get_diff_editor(..., ignore-ancestry=ignore_ancestry, ...) instead
of passing (..., ignore_ancestry=use_git_diff_format, ...). But then where
should 'use_git_diff_format' be used?
Bert wrote:
The git_diff flag, triggers a lot of
16 matches
Mail list logo
