Hi devs,
I am using SVN on Solaris platform
( svn, version 1.8.5 (r1542147) compiled Feb 14 2014, 12:54:21 on
i386-pc-solaris2.10)
and Windows
(svn, version 1.8.10 (r1615264) compiled Aug 12 2014, 04:08:18 on
x86_64/x86-microsoft-windows5.1.2600)
with *changelist* feature.
Normal svn diff comm
Hey all :)
I'm really proud to announce a small app I wrote located here ->
https://github.com/darkguy2008/SVNEncryptedAuth <- that will hook into
the svnserve.exe process and encrypt the passwords located in the
"passwd" file, while making it use a temporary file with the plaintext
passwords on a
On 29.08.2014 15:04, DARKGuy . wrote:
> Hey all :)
>
> I'm really proud to announce a small app I wrote located here ->
> https://github.com/darkguy2008/SVNEncryptedAuth <- that will hook into
> the svnserve.exe process and encrypt the passwords located in the
> "passwd" file, while making it use a
On 28 August 2014 15:18, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 5:54 PM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>>
>> On 27 August 2014 19:42, Stefan Fuhrmann
>> wrote:
>> > On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 4:00 PM, C. Michael Pilato
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On 08/26/2014 09:02 AM, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
>> >
>> >
On 29.08.2014 17:26, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>>> Please revert immediately.
>>>
>>> Proper way is to implement three specific semi-private functions in
>>> libsvn_fs_fs for collecting stats, dumping and loading FS indexes and
>>> then use in svnfsfs.
>>
>> Sounds like a good idea at the first glance, bu
(this is mostly for Ben's benefit)
I ran a quick test to determine how expensive it would be to duplicate
the whole nodes table as a basis for creating local workspaces. I used a
wc.db from a checkout of the whole Subversion tree -- it's a couple
months old, but quite representative, IMO, of the W
Please everyone calm down.
From scanning this conversation, it looks like the main technical substance is
that a commit exposed some symbols wrongly, and the layering of the
functionality may need to be improved. Or something like that. (Exactly what
the technical issues are, is not the point o
On 29.08.2014 20:12, Julian Foad wrote:
> Please everyone calm down.
>
> From scanning this conversation, it looks like the main technical substance
> is that a commit exposed some symbols wrongly, and the layering of the
> functionality may need to be improved. Or something like that. (Exactly w
Hello,
Sorry, I was not subscribed before I sent this message, I'm more used
to forums and other kind of software than mailing lists, so excuse my
lack of netiquette in this aspect. I put the same email subject and
history in here hoping the mailing list software will catch up with
it.
About the
On 29.08.2014 20:50, DARKGuy . wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Sorry, I was not subscribed before I sent this message, I'm more used
> to forums and other kind of software than mailing lists, so excuse my
> lack of netiquette in this aspect. I put the same email subject and
> history in here hoping the mailing
Hello again Brane,
I guess it deneds more on who manages the server in this case. In
mine, I needed to set up a simple, portable SVN server in my work
computer, which, by enterprise policies, makes my whole C: drive
available to my manager and tech support staff, and because I greatly
dislike this
On 29.08.2014 21:25, DARKGuy . wrote:
> I hadn't read you are the Subversion director until I received your reply :P
Eh, that's just the title I have at $DAYJOB which, while awsome, has no
bearing whatsoever on my status (or lack of same) on this project. :)
-- Brane
--
Branko Čibej | Director
On 29.08.2014 23:03, stef...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: stefan2
> Date: Fri Aug 29 21:03:25 2014
> New Revision: 1621387
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1621387
> Log:
> On the authzperf branch: Make /**/ segments match empty paths, i.e. zero
> segments, as well. That is in line with what e.g. z
On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 1:42 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 29.08.2014 23:03, stef...@apache.org wrote:
>
> Author: stefan2
> Date: Fri Aug 29 21:03:25 2014
> New Revision: 1621387
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1621387
> Log:
> On the authzperf branch: Make /**/ segments match empty paths, i.e.
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 2:25 PM, DARKGuy . wrote:
>...
> Either way thanks for taking a look at it at least, I hadn't read you
> are the Subversion director until I received your reply :P
>
Brane is but one member of our community, among many. My apologies that his
responses came off a bit "roug
15 matches
Mail list logo