[l10n] Translation status report for trunk r1642800

2014-12-01 Thread Subversion Translation Status
Translation status report for trunk@r1642800 lang trans untrans fuzzy obs -- de2869 2 1 489 +~o es2262 609 826 527 ++U~~~ fr2565 306

Re: Bindings for dump stream parser

2014-12-01 Thread C. Michael Pilato
On 12/01/2014 12:04 PM, Alexey Neyman wrote: > > On 12/01/2014 06:17 AM, C. Michael Pilato wrote: >> Just a quick question, as my bindings knowledge has grown somewhat >> stale: why do some of the wrapper functions use a format string with >> the tuple notation (e.g., "(O)") and others not (e.g., "

Re: Bindings for dump stream parser

2014-12-01 Thread Alexey Neyman
On 12/01/2014 06:17 AM, C. Michael Pilato wrote: On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 2:24 AM, Alexey Neyman > wrote: Hi all, Please review/comment. Just a quick question, as my bindings knowledge has grown somewhat stale: why do some of the wrapper functions use a format s

Re: Bindings for dump stream parser

2014-12-01 Thread C. Michael Pilato
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 2:24 AM, Alexey Neyman wrote: > Hi all, > > Please review/comment. > Just a quick question, as my bindings knowledge has grown somewhat stale: why do some of the wrapper functions use a format string with the tuple notation (e.g., "(O)") and others not (e.g., "Oss#O&")? I

RE: Bindings for dump stream parser

2014-12-01 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Alexey Neyman [mailto:sti...@att.net] > Sent: maandag 1 december 2014 08:24 > To: dev@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Bindings for dump stream parser > > Hi all, > > Please review/comment. I'm not a swig expert, but in general your patch looks good. There