Daniel Shahaf wrote on Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 22:24:36 +:
> Julian Foad wrote on Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 20:58:34 +0100:
> > Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > > Julian Foad wrote:
> > >> On 17 April 2015, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > > I suppose the answer depends on the properties, i.e., "interface", of
> > > a
Julian Foad wrote on Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 20:58:34 +0100:
> Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > Julian Foad wrote:
> >> On 17 April 2015, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
...
> > By the way, what's the relation between the "move tracking" part of the
> > work and the "first-class branches" part? I think move-tracking is
On 29.04.2015 19:44, Philip Martin wrote:
> br...@apache.org writes:
>
>> Author: brane
>> Date: Wed Apr 29 15:30:54 2015
>> New Revision: 1676769
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1676769
>> Log:
>> Fix another silly memory leak in JavaHL.
>> This time, we forgot to close off a JNI frame.
>> -
br...@apache.org writes:
> Author: brane
> Date: Wed Apr 29 15:30:54 2015
> New Revision: 1676769
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1676769
> Log:
> Fix another silly memory leak in JavaHL.
> This time, we forgot to close off a JNI frame.
> -m_env->CallObjectMethod(m_map, m_put_mid, jpropNa
On 29.04.2015 17:44, Branko Čibej wrote:
On 29.04.2015 17:03, Branko Čibej wrote:
On 29.04.2015 16:02, Branko Čibej wrote:
On 29.04.2015 11:57, Marc Strapetz wrote:
On 29.04.2015 05:31, Branko Čibej wrote:
On 28.04.2015 21:22, Bert Huijben wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Marc Strapet
On 29.04.2015 17:03, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 29.04.2015 16:02, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> On 29.04.2015 11:57, Marc Strapetz wrote:
>>> On 29.04.2015 05:31, Branko Čibej wrote:
On 28.04.2015 21:22, Bert Huijben wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Marc Strapetz [mailto:marc.strap
On 29.04.2015 16:02, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 29.04.2015 11:57, Marc Strapetz wrote:
>> On 29.04.2015 05:31, Branko Čibej wrote:
>>> On 28.04.2015 21:22, Bert Huijben wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Marc Strapetz [mailto:marc.strap...@syntevo.com]
> Sent: dinsdag 28 april 20
On 29.04.2015 11:57, Marc Strapetz wrote:
> On 29.04.2015 05:31, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> On 28.04.2015 21:22, Bert Huijben wrote:
>>>
-Original Message-
From: Marc Strapetz [mailto:marc.strap...@syntevo.com]
Sent: dinsdag 28 april 2015 20:26
To: Branko Čibej
Cc: Subv
On 29.04.2015 05:31, Branko Čibej wrote:
On 28.04.2015 21:22, Bert Huijben wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Marc Strapetz [mailto:marc.strap...@syntevo.com]
Sent: dinsdag 28 april 2015 20:26
To: Branko Čibej
Cc: Subversion Development
Subject: Re: 1.9 JavaHL memory leak in ISVNRemote#st
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 6:54 AM, Stefan Fuhrmann <
stefan.fuhrm...@wandisco.com> wrote:
> Fixed in r1676667. Details, regression test & backport tomorrow.
>
Thanks for the speedy fix. From the log message of r1676667
So, this fixes a data re-construction bug, not a repo corruption.
>
That's a g
Subject says it all. Two reasons:
* Java 5 has been officially dead since 2009
* 1.9 JavaHL uses Java6 APIs
It's possible to cross-compile for Java5 using newer JDKs, but the
compiler only checks language features, not library usage; for the
latter, you actually need Java5 classes available.
11 matches
Mail list logo