On 30.12.2015 16:49, Evgeny Kotkov wrote:
Evgeny Kotkov writes:
Stefan Fuhrmann writes:
Thanks, it would be nice if could do something within Subversion because
httpd and apr patches may take a while to trickle down into releases.
Meanwhile, I posted a patch for mod_dav on the httpd dev lis
On 04.01.2016 17:20, Philip Martin wrote:
Stefan Fuhrmann writes:
On 04.01.2016 14:25, Philip Martin wrote:
- The number of system calls made by Apache goes down
68822 to 50664 for hot FSFS cache
Do you have quick way to find out which files
we are reading in that case? My gue
On 09.01.2016 14:39, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
On 9 January 2016 at 03:48, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
Hi Ivan & interested parties,
Hi Stefan!
See my response inline.
* BRANCH-README: "The branch is NOT going to be merged to
trunk; I'm going to re-implement everything in trunk ..."
- Why imp
Bert Huijben writes:
> A quick review showed one minor issue, see inline.
[...]
>> @@ -2399,6 +2422,17 @@ svn_fs_file_length(svn_filesize_t *lengt
>> * @since New in 1.6.
>> */
>> svn_error_t *
>> +svn_fs_file_checksum2(svn_checksum_t **checksum,
>> + svn_checksum_kind
Julian Foad writes:
> Test time in seconds (two runs) Svn version
> 739, 7311.8.15
> 1068, 1071 1.9.3
> 802, 8051.9.x+r1710167
That corresponds to my figures as far as I recall. The reason 1.9 is
slower than 1.8 is that 1.9 makes the pristines read-only and the extra
chmods() mor
A quick review showed one minor issue, see inline.
> -Original Message-
> From: kot...@apache.org [mailto:kot...@apache.org]
> Sent: zondag 10 januari 2016 04:21
> To: comm...@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: svn commit: r1723900 - in /subversion/branches/fs-node-
> api/subversion: include
On 8 January 2016, Julian Foad wrote:
> This commit was
>
> http://svn.apache.org/r1710167
>
> The backport proposal was not approved in time for 1.9.3. Due to
> customer pressure I'm now testing & reviewing it.
+1, approved.
On my system, the total test times for 'exclusive locking' mode were:
7 matches
Mail list logo