Greg Stein wrote on Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 07:29:11 -0500:
> I've reviewed the reports, and it looks like we've maintained all our ABI
> guarantees. The changes are what I would expect.
>
> Thank you for this!
+1 on both counts.
Perhaps we could run this on candidate tarballs as part of the releas
This is freakin' HOT. Very nice work!
I've reviewed the reports, and it looks like we've maintained all our ABI
guarantees. The changes are what I would expect.
Thank you for this!
Cheers,
-g
On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 12:45 AM, Ponomarenko Andrey <
andrewponomare...@yandex.ru> wrote:
> Hello,
>
Hello,
I'm working on a new project for backward compatibility analysis of the Linux
ABIs. The report for Subversion base libraries has been recently added to the
project: http://abi-laboratory.pro/tracker/timeline/subversion/
The report is generated with the help of the abi-compliance-checker,
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 11:29 AM, Bert Huijben wrote:
...
>> I think we should just generalize this section.
>>
>> There are DST rule changes around the world at least every year -commonly
>> more often- and I don't think anybody would r
4 matches
Mail list logo