Re: ABI changes analysis

2016-06-25 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Greg Stein wrote on Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 07:29:11 -0500: > I've reviewed the reports, and it looks like we've maintained all our ABI > guarantees. The changes are what I would expect. > > Thank you for this! +1 on both counts. Perhaps we could run this on candidate tarballs as part of the releas

Re: ABI changes analysis

2016-06-25 Thread Greg Stein
This is freakin' HOT. Very nice work! I've reviewed the reports, and it looks like we've maintained all our ABI guarantees. The changes are what I would expect. Thank you for this! Cheers, -g On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 12:45 AM, Ponomarenko Andrey < andrewponomare...@yandex.ru> wrote: > Hello, >

ABI changes analysis

2016-06-25 Thread Ponomarenko Andrey
Hello, I'm working on a new project for backward compatibility analysis of the Linux ABIs. The report for Subversion base libraries has been recently added to the project: http://abi-laboratory.pro/tracker/timeline/subversion/ The report is generated with the help of the abi-compliance-checker,

Re: Cleaning up the FAQ

2016-06-25 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote: > On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 11:29 AM, Bert Huijben wrote: ... >> I think we should just generalize this section. >> >> There are DST rule changes around the world at least every year -commonly >> more often- and I don't think anybody would r