Re: svn commit: r1756266 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_fs_fs/transaction.c

2016-08-24 Thread Ivan Zhakov
On 17 August 2016 at 01:47, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > i...@apache.org wrote on Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 13:18:57 -: >> Author: ivan >> Date: Sat Aug 13 13:18:57 2016 >> New Revision: 1756266 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1756266&view=rev >> Log: >> FSFS: Write the sha1->rep mapping in t

Re: svn commit: r1757532 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/mod_dav_svn/repos.c

2016-08-24 Thread Evgeny Kotkov
Stefan Hett writes: > Would this (and your other two commits) be something which should be > considered to backport to 1.9 (and maybe even 1.8)? As far as I was > following the history of this, it sounds like a reasonable improvement > worth for a backport, no? Sure, I'll nominate them tomorrow.

Re: svn commit: r1757532 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/mod_dav_svn/repos.c

2016-08-24 Thread Stefan
On 8/24/2016 20:07, Evgeny Kotkov wrote: > Bert Huijben writes: > >> Nice fix :-) >> >> Do you have any numbers on the resulting memory usage compared to the >> previous version. I would imagine that this could really help on updates >> with a lot of files, especially on threaded apache. > Thanks!

Re: svn commit: r1757532 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/mod_dav_svn/repos.c

2016-08-24 Thread Evgeny Kotkov
Bert Huijben writes: > Nice fix :-) > > Do you have any numbers on the resulting memory usage compared to the > previous version. I would imagine that this could really help on updates > with a lot of files, especially on threaded apache. Thanks! The difference is 32 bytes per every svn_stream_

RE: svn commit: r1757532 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/mod_dav_svn/repos.c

2016-08-24 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: kot...@apache.org [mailto:kot...@apache.org] > Sent: woensdag 24 augustus 2016 16:43 > To: comm...@subversion.apache.org > Subject: svn commit: r1757532 - > /subversion/trunk/subversion/mod_dav_svn/repos.c > > Author: kotkov > Date: Wed Aug 24 14:43:21 2016 >