On 21.09.2017 00:33, br...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: brane
> Date: Wed Sep 20 22:33:54 2017
> New Revision: 1809090
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1809090&view=rev
> Log:
> Merge upstream utf8proc 2.1.0 into trunk.
I've been meaning to do this for a while. In short: this is a faster,
>
> [...]
>
> if /foo does not exist at checkout time -- and if we'd want /* to mean
> "include anything new that appears in the repository", not "include
> everything else that's in the repository at the time of the checkout".
>
I'm not sure if you agree or not, but I think the fine-grained globb
>
>
>
> 2. Previously I forked a medium-sized Monorepo on Github, and did the the
> complete expand/contract work for it - https://github.com/paul-hamm
> ant-fork/jooby-monorepo-experiment - in Python.
>
>
LOGIBALL's Tim Krüger has just written about a deployment of an
expanding/contracting monorep
On 21.09.2017 12:08, Paul Hammant wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> if /foo does not exist at checkout time -- and if we'd want /* to mean
> "include anything new that appears in the repository", not "include
> everything else that's in the repository at the time of the checkout".
>
>
> I'm not
Dear Members of the Subversion community,
The Apache Subversion project organizes a yearly 1-week-long hackathon
for its project members where we gather around at one location and push
forward the development of the project. This gives us a time frame where
we can fully focus and concentrate on t
>
>
> I'm not sure if you agree or not, but I think the fine-grained globbing
> include/exclude capability as Perforce has it. is required.
>
>
> "Required" implies "working copy format change". That's always hard.
>
> "Optional" means "get some of the features sooner."
>
I'm a big advocate for "s
Op 20 sep. 2017 17:28 schreef "Pavel Lyalyakin" <
pavel.lyalya...@visualsvn.com>:
Hello,
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 12:42 AM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 6:00 PM, Pavel Lyalyakin
> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 11:57 PM, Johan Corveleyn
wrote:
> >> On Th
https://ci.apache.org/builders/svn-warnings currently reports "success"
on builds that have compiler warnings, e.g.,
https://ci.apache.org/builders/svn-warnings/builds/1999/steps/Make/logs/stdio
That's broken: it's supposed to report "warnings" (in yellow) rather
than "success" (in green) in that
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Thu, 21 Sep 2017 15:54 +0200:
> Op 20 sep. 2017 17:28 schreef "Pavel Lyalyakin" <
> pavel.lyalya...@visualsvn.com>:
>
> Hello,
The line "Hello" was written by Pavel; Johan's MUA should have preceded
it with a ">" but did not. Consequently, the reply is virtually
unreadab
9 matches
Mail list logo
