Nathan Hartman wrote on Thu, 15 Feb 2018 22:01 -0500:
> On Feb 15, 2018, at 4:11 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> >
> > Péter wrote on Thu, 15 Feb 2018 19:47 +0100:
> > I'm not sure why you say "at least" 17 deltas. The default value of
> > max-linear-deltification (see
On Feb 15, 2018, at 4:11 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>
> Péter wrote on Thu, 15 Feb 2018 19:47 +0100:
> I'm not sure why you say "at least" 17 deltas. The default value of
> max-linear-deltification (see fsfs.conf) is 16, meaning that no fulltext
> will require 17 delta
On 15.02.2018 22:11, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>> With say, 10 revisions, when someone checks out the last revision:
>> svn starts (would start, with the FSX backend)
>> with the 30 years old, "fossile" ancient revision? (It would be case
>> with the "FSFS-like way".) Which has nothing common
Péter wrote on Thu, 15 Feb 2018 19:47 +0100:
> [I am not a list member]
>
> In the proposed FSX backend,
> [ https://subversion.apache.org/docs/release-notes/1.9.html#fsx ]
> what type of deltas is planned? Deltas against an older - or newer revision?
> [
Oops, sorry, was trying to reply to the moderation system and
accidentally sent a blank reply here instead.
- Julian
Julian Foad wrote:
(just quoted text)
Péter wrote:
[I am not a list member]
In the proposed FSX backend,
[ https://subversion.apache.org/docs/release-notes/1.9.html#fsx ]
what type of deltas is planned? Deltas against an older - or newer
revision?
[ http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/trunk/notes/skip-deltas ]
FSFS-like
[I am not a list member]
In the proposed FSX backend,
[ https://subversion.apache.org/docs/release-notes/1.9.html#fsx ]
what type of deltas is planned? Deltas against an older - or newer revision?
[ http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/trunk/notes/skip-deltas ]
FSFS-like way, or BDB-like
On 15.02.2018 16:54, Thomas Quinot wrote:
> * Philip Martin, 2018-02-15 :
>
>> That looks correct so far, but it leads me to consider port numbers.
>>
>> svn ls svn://hostname:3691/repo
>>
>> Should the server look for the repository under 'hostname:3691' or under
>> the plain 'hostname'? I
* Philip Martin, 2018-02-15 :
> That looks correct so far, but it leads me to consider port numbers.
>
> svn ls svn://hostname:3691/repo
>
> Should the server look for the repository under 'hostname:3691' or under
> the plain 'hostname'? I suspect the port number should be ignored and
> that
Thomas Quinot writes:
> [[[
> Fix failure to find repo in virtual host mode if user name present
>
> * subversion/svnserve/serve.c
> (find_repos): In vhost mode, skip past user name and password,
> if present.
> ]]]
>
> Index: subversion/svnserve/serve.c
>
10 matches
Mail list logo