On 2019/12/21 5:04, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Yasuhito FUTATSUKI wrote on Fri, 20 Dec 2019 13:31 +00:00:
>> I found that nb->shelved_func() in this line is
>> svn_swig_py_client_status_func() on swig Python bindings, and it is
>> incorrectly implemented that it isn't return value (i.e. void type).
>>
Hi,
There's something wrong with "svn list -v" column alignment when
there are author names with more than 8 characters. For instance,
with the gcc repository:
[...]
279442 jozeflDec 16 12:02 libgcc/
278886 jvdelisle Dec 01 23:29 libgfortran/
[...]
--
Vincent Lefè
Yasuhito FUTATSUKI wrote on Fri, 20 Dec 2019 13:31 +00:00:
> I found that nb->shelved_func() in this line is
> svn_swig_py_client_status_func() on swig Python bindings, and it is
> incorrectly implemented that it isn't return value (i.e. void type).
> This should be svn_client_status_func_t, which
On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 07:19:27PM +0100, Dr. Thomas Orgis wrote:
> Please let's avoid the discussion whether one should version config
> files of the actual servers or the pupped/ansible/… scripts that
> generate them and just consider that
>
> 1. a directory tree on a live system is versioned in
Hi,
it was suggested to me to discuss Subversion behaviour that is causing
me some nuisance while versioning configuration files, namely the /etc
dir of Linux servers. It may be smarter to just check in the files I
edit (I do that on some), but there is some convenience in telling svn
to just acce
On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 11:30:05PM +0900, Yasuhito FUTATSUKI wrote:
> On 2019/12/20 22:31, Yasuhito FUTATSUKI wrote:
>
> > I found that nb->shelved_func() in this line is
> > svn_swig_py_client_status_func() on swig Python bindings, and it is
> > incorrectly implemented that it isn't return valu
On 2019/12/20 22:31, Yasuhito FUTATSUKI wrote:
> I found that nb->shelved_func() in this line is
> svn_swig_py_client_status_func() on swig Python bindings, and it is
> incorrectly implemented that it isn't return value (i.e. void type).
> This should be svn_client_status_func_t, which returns s
On 2019/12/20 21:11, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 08:47:38PM +0900, Yasuhito FUTATSUKI wrote:
>> And then, another problem has been occurred ... in
>> SubversionClientTestCase.test_shelf(). I'll take a look.
>>
>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/svn-bb-openbsd/builds/464/steps/T
On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 08:47:38PM +0900, Yasuhito FUTATSUKI wrote:
> And then, another problem has been occurred ... in
> SubversionClientTestCase.test_shelf(). I'll take a look.
>
> https://ci.apache.org/builders/svn-bb-openbsd/builds/464/steps/Test%20bindings/logs/testlog-swig-py
This the cor
On 2019/12/20 19:22, Yasuhito FUTATSUKI wrote:
> On 2019/12/20 18:40, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 08:51:31PM -, futat...@apache.org wrote:
>>> Author: futatuki
>>> Date: Thu Dec 19 20:51:31 2019
>>> New Revision: 1871827
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=187182
On 2019/12/20 18:40, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 08:51:31PM -, futat...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: futatuki
>> Date: Thu Dec 19 20:51:31 2019
>> New Revision: 1871827
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1871827&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Fix pool life time bug on test_lo
On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 08:51:31PM -, futat...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: futatuki
> Date: Thu Dec 19 20:51:31 2019
> New Revision: 1871827
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1871827&view=rev
> Log:
> Fix pool life time bug on test_log5_revprops test case in swig-py.
Nice thank you!
12 matches
Mail list logo
