Re: OpenBSD buildbot

2019-12-31 Thread Nathan Hartman
On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 11:35 AM James McCoy wrote: > [NOTE] > You may have encountered a bug in the Ruby interpreter or extension libraries. > Bug reports are welcome. > For details: http://www.ruby-lang.org/bugreport.html Out of curiosity, has anyone been reporting these to the ruby devs?

Re: OpenBSD buildbot

2019-12-31 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 11:35:22AM -0500, James McCoy wrote: > On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 05:04:00PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 04:27:06PM +0100, Branko Čibej wrote: > > > On 31.12.2019 16:05, Stefan Sperling wrote: > > > > On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 10:33:45AM +0100,

[PATCH] Fix issue #4841: do not use internal ruby include paths

2019-12-31 Thread Anatol Pomozov
Building subversion with ruby2.7 produces a compilation warning: subversion/bindings/swig/ruby/svn_client.c:1666:13: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘assert’ [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 1666 | assert(own); /* badly formed typemap which will lead to a memory leak - it must set

Re: OpenBSD buildbot

2019-12-31 Thread James McCoy
On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 05:04:00PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 04:27:06PM +0100, Branko Čibej wrote: > > On 31.12.2019 16:05, Stefan Sperling wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 10:33:45AM +0100, Branko Čibej wrote: > > >> The OpenBSD buildbot seems to have a 50%

Re: OpenBSD buildbot

2019-12-31 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 04:27:06PM +0100, Branko Čibej wrote: > On 31.12.2019 16:05, Stefan Sperling wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 10:33:45AM +0100, Branko Čibej wrote: > >> The OpenBSD buildbot seems to have a 50% chance of failing due to a bus > >> error deep inside the Ruby runtime (most

Re: OpenBSD buildbot

2019-12-31 Thread Branko Čibej
On 31.12.2019 16:05, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 10:33:45AM +0100, Branko Čibej wrote: >> The OpenBSD buildbot seems to have a 50% chance of failing due to a bus >> error deep inside the Ruby runtime (most likely caused by misaligned >> memory access). This makes rather less

Re: OpenBSD buildbot

2019-12-31 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 10:33:45AM +0100, Branko Čibej wrote: > The OpenBSD buildbot seems to have a 50% chance of failing due to a bus > error deep inside the Ruby runtime (most likely caused by misaligned > memory access). This makes rather less useful than it could be. > > I'm wondering if it

Re: svn commit: r1872118 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: include/private/svn_sorts_private.h libsvn_client/merge.c libsvn_subr/mergeinfo.c libsvn_subr/sorts.c tests/libsvn_subr/mergeinfo-test.c

2019-12-31 Thread Julian Foad
Daniel Shahaf wrote: - SVN_ERR_ASSERT(svn_rangelist__is_canonical(rangelist)); + /*SVN_ERR_ASSERT(svn_rangelist__is_canonical(rangelist));*/ Was this change intended to be committed? I did not intend to leave it like that, but it is something I still need to review in the area of better

Re: OpenBSD buildbot

2019-12-31 Thread Paul Hammant
Just change it to retries=5 on some fine-grained basis and stop worrying about it as long as that fixes it?

OpenBSD buildbot

2019-12-31 Thread Branko Čibej
The OpenBSD buildbot seems to have a 50% chance of failing due to a bus error deep inside the Ruby runtime (most likely caused by misaligned memory access). This makes rather less useful than it could be. I'm wondering if it would make sense to just skip building and testing the Ruby bindings