On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 11:35 AM James McCoy wrote:
> [NOTE]
> You may have encountered a bug in the Ruby interpreter or extension libraries.
> Bug reports are welcome.
> For details: http://www.ruby-lang.org/bugreport.html
Out of curiosity, has anyone been reporting these to the ruby devs?
On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 11:35:22AM -0500, James McCoy wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 05:04:00PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 04:27:06PM +0100, Branko Čibej wrote:
> > > On 31.12.2019 16:05, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 10:33:45AM +0100,
Building subversion with ruby2.7 produces a compilation warning:
subversion/bindings/swig/ruby/svn_client.c:1666:13: warning: implicit
declaration of function ‘assert’ [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
1666 | assert(own); /* badly formed typemap which will lead to a memory leak -
it must set
On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 05:04:00PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 04:27:06PM +0100, Branko Čibej wrote:
> > On 31.12.2019 16:05, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > > On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 10:33:45AM +0100, Branko Čibej wrote:
> > >> The OpenBSD buildbot seems to have a 50%
On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 04:27:06PM +0100, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 31.12.2019 16:05, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 10:33:45AM +0100, Branko Čibej wrote:
> >> The OpenBSD buildbot seems to have a 50% chance of failing due to a bus
> >> error deep inside the Ruby runtime (most
On 31.12.2019 16:05, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 10:33:45AM +0100, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> The OpenBSD buildbot seems to have a 50% chance of failing due to a bus
>> error deep inside the Ruby runtime (most likely caused by misaligned
>> memory access). This makes rather less
On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 10:33:45AM +0100, Branko Čibej wrote:
> The OpenBSD buildbot seems to have a 50% chance of failing due to a bus
> error deep inside the Ruby runtime (most likely caused by misaligned
> memory access). This makes rather less useful than it could be.
>
> I'm wondering if it
Daniel Shahaf wrote:
- SVN_ERR_ASSERT(svn_rangelist__is_canonical(rangelist));
+ /*SVN_ERR_ASSERT(svn_rangelist__is_canonical(rangelist));*/
Was this change intended to be committed?
I did not intend to leave it like that, but it is something I still need
to review in the area of better
Just change it to retries=5 on some fine-grained basis and stop worrying
about it as long as that fixes it?
The OpenBSD buildbot seems to have a 50% chance of failing due to a bus
error deep inside the Ruby runtime (most likely caused by misaligned
memory access). This makes rather less useful than it could be.
I'm wondering if it would make sense to just skip building and testing
the Ruby bindings
10 matches
Mail list logo