On 2020-01-16 10:37:05 +, Julian Foad wrote:
> Branko Čibej wrote:
> > > Why are we overthinking this?
>
> Indeed. There is a lot of energy going in to this thread. It's great to
> see energy and enthusiasm, but...
>
> I know the current algorithm is sometimes annoying.
>
> I accept sub-op
On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 3:14 PM Doug Robinson
wrote:
> It's super cool that Subversion's birthday is Leap Day 2000. [1]
>>
>> I think it's a great idea to celebrate with a press release.
>>
>
> There's a LinkedIn discussion group for SVN (and CVS) [3]. Perhaps
> posting there might get some test
Julian Foad wrote on Thu, 16 Jan 2020 09:18 +00:00:
> I inspected the debug prints whizzing by, and noted that it included
> each of the different kinds of input cases I expected (e.g. empty
> ranges, reversed ranges, duplicate ranges, overlapping ranges, etc.) and
> that the results included ex
On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 10:36 AM Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Julian and I discussed this on IRC today; the conclusion is:
>
> - With the behaviour of the test with seed=0 having been manually
> reviewed, we're satisfied that the test achieves adequate coverage.
>
> - The properties that the magic num
julianf...@apache.org wrote on Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 14:54:46 -:
> @@ -2089,18 +2130,22 @@ test_rangelist_merge_random_canonical_in
> +if (failure_mode)
>{
> -printf("testcase FAIL: %s / %s\n",
> +printf("first example of a failure mode: %s / %s\n"
> +
5 matches
Mail list logo
