Julian Foad wrote on Fri, 09 Apr 2021 20:20 +00:00:
> 1. I agree with softening this to be a warning rather than a hard error
> in a patch release, and then a hard error in 1.15. I hadn't thought of
> doing a preprocessor-based time-bomb; good idea. I will retract my
> backport until I have done
Daniel and Daniel, thanks for your replies.
Responding in summary, after taking all your points and questions into
consideration.
1. I agree with softening this to be a warning rather than a hard error in a
patch release, and then a hard error in 1.15. I hadn't thought of doing a
preprocessor-
2 matches
Mail list logo
