Re: Web site notice regarding log4j

2021-12-15 Thread Pavel Lyalyakin
On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 1:33 AM Mark Phippard wrote: > On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 4:59 PM Pavel Lyalyakin > wrote: > > > > > It seems that the list markup is wrong. There should be (unordered > list) tag instead of (paragraph). > > > > I also think that it makes sense to include links to the SVN

Re: Web site notice regarding log4j

2021-12-15 Thread Nathan Hartman
On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 4:50 PM Daniel Sahlberg wrote: > > https://subversion.apache.org/#news-20211215 > > (waiting for the native-english-speakers to roast me :-) ) > LGTM, I don't see any issues with the english. Thanks for posting it! Cheers, Nathan

Re: Web site notice regarding log4j

2021-12-15 Thread Mark Phippard
On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 4:59 PM Pavel Lyalyakin wrote: > > It seems that the list markup is wrong. There should be (unordered list) > tag instead of (paragraph). > > I also think that it makes sense to include links to the SVN Edge's page[1] > and the announcement made by VisualSVN Team[2]. E

Re: Web site notice regarding log4j

2021-12-15 Thread Pavel Lyalyakin
E-44228 (Log4Shell) at >> https://www.visualsvn.com/company/news/visualsvn-products-are-not-affected-by-CVE-2021-44228 >> . >> >> I suspect we do not want to be responsible for providing all of these >> links here but I created a similar page for SVN Edge here: >> >> >

Re: Web site notice regarding log4j

2021-12-15 Thread Daniel Sahlberg
ou can find the announcement from VisualSVN Team regarding > CVE-44228 (Log4Shell) at > https://www.visualsvn.com/company/news/visualsvn-products-are-not-affected-by-CVE-2021-44228 > . > > I suspect we do not want to be responsible for providing all of these > links here but I create

Re: Web site notice regarding log4j

2021-12-15 Thread Mark Phippard
On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 7:25 AM Pavel Lyalyakin wrote: > > > > On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 2:13 PM Daniel Sahlberg > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> There has been several different requests regarding if Subversion is >> vulnerable to the latest log4j problem. Should we write a new item about >> this for t

Re: Web site notice regarding log4j

2021-12-15 Thread Pavel Lyalyakin
On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 2:13 PM Daniel Sahlberg wrote: > Hi, > > There has been several different requests regarding if Subversion is > vulnerable to the latest log4j problem. Should we write a new item about > this for the web site? Several people (Pavel Lyalyakin, Mark Phippard) has > made valu

Re: Web site notice regarding log4j

2021-12-15 Thread Mark Phippard
On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 6:13 AM Daniel Sahlberg wrote: > > Hi, > > There has been several different requests regarding if Subversion is > vulnerable to the latest log4j problem. Should we write a new item about this > for the web site? Several people (Pavel Lyalyakin, Mark Phippard) has made >

Web site notice regarding log4j

2021-12-15 Thread Daniel Sahlberg
Hi, There has been several different requests regarding if Subversion is vulnerable to the latest log4j problem. Should we write a new item about this for the web site? Several people (Pavel Lyalyakin, Mark Phippard) has made valuable comments and I can (with their permission) distil some condense