Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects.

On 14 Jan 2022, Julian Foad wrote: I looked into the multi-wc-format branch today. Brane wrote previously: This basically needs the following: * a huge sync with trunk; Done. Nice :-). (Understatement is the height of style, ahem.) Now I'm considering what would be the pros and cons of

Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects.

> multi-wc-format branch [...] anything I'm missing? As soon as I stepped away I could see more clearly: Basically 'multi-wc-format' is just providing an API up to the client layer for enumerating WC format variants. The same logical functionality could be implemented for a particular feature (e.g

Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects.

I looked into the multi-wc-format branch today. Brane wrote previously: > This basically needs the following: > > * a huge sync with trunk; Done. > * a way to pass the requested WC format from the command-line into the WC library when creating a working copy (I never found a nice, clean way to