On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 7:16 PM Grierson, David
wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Branko Čibej [mailto:br...@wandisco.com]
> > Sent: 23 July 2015 07:59
> > To: us...@subversion.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Feature request: Save the old file when svn revert
> >
> > On 22.07.2015 15:51
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 12:12 AM, Bert Huijben wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Hans-Emil Skogh [mailto:hans-emil.sk...@tritech.se]
> > Sent: woensdag 11 mei 2011 15:48
> > To: dev@subversion.apache.org
> > Subject: RE: WC-NG, externals and fast properties
> >
> > Thanks for yo
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 2:13 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> On 04/22/2011 11:40 PM, Daniel Becroft wrote:
> > But then you're
> > asking to switch a working copy which reflects trunk's *parent
> directory* to
> > trunk's URL.
> >
> >
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 1:02 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> On 04/22/2011 05:15 PM, Daniel Becroft wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've just updated to trunk@1096029, and have noticed the following
> change in
> > behavior.
> >
> > Previously, any reprod
fine. I don't
think this is required, though, as the paths share a common ancestry
already.
Cheers,
---
Daniel Becroft
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 4:51 AM, Mark Phippard wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Mark Phippard wrote:
>
> > I have been working on a framework for writing tests to record
> > performance. I have something good enough to share:
> >
> > https://ctf.open.collab.net/sf/projects/csvn
> >
> >
Hi,
Below is a patch that fixes the regression introduced in r1075802. THe
thread related to this regress can
be found here: http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2011-03/0145.shtml.
Cheers,
Daniel B.
[[[
Fix regression introduced in r1075802, where conflict files were created
during
a dry-run merge.
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 7:06 AM, Daniel Becroft wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 1:50 AM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>
>> On 03/11/2011 10:03 AM, Arwin Arni wrote:
>> > Index: ../subversion/tests/c
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 1:50 AM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> On 03/11/2011 10:03 AM, Arwin Arni wrote:
> > Index: ../subversion/tests/cmdline/merge_tests.py
> > ===
> > --- ../subversion/tests/cmdline/merge_tests.py(revision 1
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 8:27 AM, Daniel Becroft wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 11:35 PM, Arwin Arni wrote:
>
>> On Friday 04 March 2011 05:15 PM, Philip Martin wrote:
>>
>>> Arwin Arni writes:
>>>
>>> On Friday 04 March 2011 04:52 PM, Philip
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 11:35 PM, Arwin Arni wrote:
> On Friday 04 March 2011 05:15 PM, Philip Martin wrote:
>
>> Arwin Arni writes:
>>
>> On Friday 04 March 2011 04:52 PM, Philip Martin wrote:
>>>
Arwin Arni writes:
Post this fix, I noticed that **merge --dry-run** throws an
>
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 3:34 AM, Noorul Islam K M wrote:
>
> Please find attached patch for issue 3826. All tests pass using 'make
> check'
>
Hey Noorul,
I had a quick look at this issue last night. It appears a similar issue
exists for almost every command (I checked 'info', 'status' and 'updat
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 2:15 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Daniel Becroft wrote on Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 08:37:12 +1000:
> > On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 7:31 AM, Daniel Shahaf >wrote:
> >
> > > Daniel Becroft wrote on Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 06:27:31 +1000:
> > > > O
2011/2/21 Branko Čibej
> On 20.02.2011 22:05, Daniel Becroft wrote:
> > ...
> > /subversion/libsvn_fs_fs/.libs/libsvn_fs_fs-1.so.0: undefined
> > reference to `svn_temp_serializer__add_string'
> > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> >
> > I've n
#x27;.
I assume no-one else is having this problem (or no-one's noticed it yet),
but is there anything else I need to do (do I need to go right back and
re-run ./autogen.sh?)
Cheers,
---
Daniel Becroft
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 11:33 AM, Noorul Islam K M
> wrote:
> >
> > See below in line more information about the patches.
> >
> > Noorul Islam K M writes:
> ...
> >> 3. Issue 3690
> >>
> >>http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2011-01/0414.sh
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 7:31 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Daniel Becroft wrote on Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 06:27:31 +1000:
> > On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 11:26 PM, Daniel Shahaf >wrote:
> > > Daniel Becroft wrote on Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 07:21:30 +1000:
> > > > @@ -111
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 6:07 AM, Grigory Petrov wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I'm learning subversion API right now and examining it's source code and
> examples. It's a lot of things in subversion source code that is called a
> "baton". For example, svn_cmdline_create_auth_baton() create "auth baton",
> an
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 11:26 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> [ disclaimer: I'm not familiar with wc internals yet; sorry; hope I'll
> learn something while reviewing this ]
>
> Daniel Becroft wrote on Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 07:21:30 +1000:
> > >
> > Hey
>
> > Index: subversion/libsvn_wc/merge.c
>> > ===
>> > --- subversion/libsvn_wc/merge.c (revision 1068136)
>> > +++ subversion/libsvn_wc/merge.c (working copy)
>> > @@ -1094,6 +1094,7 @@
>> >const char *l
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 7:46 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 07:34:53AM +1000, Daniel Becroft wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Attached is a completed patch to resolve issue 3686[1], where the
> executable
> > bit is not maintained during the merge of a
executable): Remove @XFail decorator.
]]]
[1]
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=463&dsMessageId=2635024
Cheers,
Daniel B.
---
Daniel Becroft
Index: subversion/tests/cmdline/merge_tests.py
===
--- subversion
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 12:24 AM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> On 01/31/2011 12:21 AM, Daniel Becroft wrote:
> > I'm submitting this patch as a "am I on the right track?" submission,
> rather
> > than a final job. I'll craft a log message if I'm correct.
ge_tests.py
>>
>
> You missed:
>
> merge_tests.py:
> XFail(SkipUnless(merge_change_to_file_with_executable,
> merge_tests.py-svntest.main.is_posix_os)),
>
> which Daniel Becroft (CC'd) recently added, and has submitted a pa
Hi,
Attached is a (work-in-progress) patch to fix issue 3686[1].
For those unfamiliar with the issue: when a binary file (with svn:executable
set) is modified as a result of a merge, the executable flag is missing
post-merge. A commit will restore the flag.
I've looked into the code, and have fo
On 27/01/2011, at 17:04, Noorul Islam K M wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am planning to work on issue 3690. Before starting with this I have
> few questions.
>
> 1. Hyrum updated the issue with his comment stating that already there
> is work going on in the branch ignore-mergeinfo which addresses
> s
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 7:36 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Daniel Becroft wrote on Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 07:27:15 +1000:
> > On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 3:08 AM, Daniel Shahaf >wrote:
> > > Daniel Becroft wrote on Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 07:13:12 +1000:
> > > > 2)
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 3:08 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Daniel Becroft wrote on Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 07:13:12 +1000:
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > I was looking through the "Getting Involved" section of the Subversion
> > website, and decided to start by writi
g svn:executable also sets the
executable bit?
2) The problem also exists under the '--reintegrate' scenario, even
after a subsequent commit. Would it be better to include that case
here, or move the entire test to the merge_reintegrate.py suite?
Regards,
Daniel Becroft
[[[
Add regression te
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 12:39 PM, Hyrum K. Wright <
hyrum_wri...@mail.utexas.edu> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 4:28 PM, Hyrum K. Wright
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Daniel Becroft
> wrote:
> >> On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 8:50 PM, Daniel Becroft
>
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 2:01 PM, Blair Zajac wrote:
> I'm working with a client and they have a large source source code checkout
> that takes over 10 minutes do to an svn update. Their 1.6.x working copy
> size is 3.6 GB with 74,000 files and 19,230 directories. The amount of IO
> to do all th
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 8:50 PM, Daniel Becroft wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 7:13 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>
>> Instead of guessing which function causes the lstat() calls, could we
>> have a tool tell?
>>
>> I've looked at 'ltrace -S', but it seems
785
Using additional breakpoints, I have verified that
svn_wc__node_walk_children, svn_wc__internal_walk_children and walker_helper
only get called once. It seems to be an issue within the walker_helper
itself.
I'll continue looking at it further - let me know if I'm barking up the
wron
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 8:09 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 07:18:56AM +1000, Daniel Becroft wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 9:22 AM, Peter Samuelson wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > [Daniel Becroft]
> > > > I've just managed to bui
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 9:22 AM, Peter Samuelson wrote:
>
> [Daniel Becroft]
> > I've just managed to build/install trunk on my ubuntu box at home (first
> > application I've ever compiled on it - yey!).
> >
> > What debugging tools would you recommend to i
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 7:50 AM, Hyrum K. Wright <
hyrum_wri...@mail.utexas.edu> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 3:43 PM, Daniel Becroft
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Philip Martin <
> philip.mar...@wandisco.com>wrote:
> ...
> >> > I can&
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Philip Martin wrote:
> Daniel Becroft writes:
>
> > Under 1.7.x, the following file(s) are accessed (merging the same
> revision
> > as above):
> >
> > - .svn\wc.db
> > - Every versioned file in the working copy
>
essed. I seem
to recall some discussion about preventing/warning merging into modified
working copies, could this be the cause? I've tried modifying files within
the WC, but the merge still succeeds.
---
Daniel Becroft
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 1:25 AM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> On 11/30/2010 07:02 AM, Daniel Becroft wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 7:18 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> >> Not on windows, you have to link a magic library into your code to get
> >> that behaviour.
> >
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 7:18 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
>
> On 30.11.2010 05:32, Daniel Becroft wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > During testing of a 1.7.x build, I've noticed that 'svn add' on trunk no
> > longer accepts wildcards:
> >
> > svn 1.6.x:
&g
k\A>D:\temp\svn_sandpit\svn7.exe add
*.txt
svn: warning: 'D:\temp\svn_sandpit\workingcopy\trunk\A\*.txt' not found
I thought that wildcards were expanded by the OS/Shell, and then passed to
SVN. Is this not the case?
Cheers,
---
Daniel Becroft
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 11:58 PM, Mark Phippard wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 8:02 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 02:05:55PM +1000, Daniel Becroft wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I'm currently trialling the nightly builds that
Is this kind of performance hit during an upgrade expected? Is the
recommended upgrade option expected to be to use 'svn upgrade' or do get a
fresh checkout?
If you need stats regarding the working copy, I can provide them.
Cheers,
---
Daniel Becroft
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 4:16 PM, Matthias Weyh wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Since I did not get any responses to my question on the users group and
> this might be a bug I am reposting this to the dev user group.
>
> I am looking forward to your answers.
>
> Thanks,
> Matthias
>
> -Ursprüngliche Nachric
44 matches
Mail list logo
