Re: [PATCH] Tweak the SHA-1 FAQ entry

2017-07-07 Thread Evgeny Kotkov
Bert Huijben writes: > Except for s/ it / is / on this line, +1... Looks very good! Jacek Materna writes: > Fair enough! > > Rest looks great. I fixed the typo and committed the patch in https://svn.apache.org/r1801202 Regards, Evgeny Kotkov

Re: [PATCH] Tweak the SHA-1 FAQ entry

2017-07-07 Thread Jacek Materna
Fair enough! Rest looks great. -- Jacek Materna Assembla CTO +1 210 410 7661 +48 578 296 708 Sent from my Mobile Device > On Jul 7, 2017, at 5:47 PM, Evgeny Kotkov wrote: > > Jacek Materna writes: > >> Shouldn't vulnerability / shattered remain a keyword? I believe it was >> a comment in t

Re: [PATCH] Tweak the SHA-1 FAQ entry

2017-07-07 Thread Evgeny Kotkov
Jacek Materna writes: > Shouldn't vulnerability / shattered remain a keyword? I believe it was > a comment in the patch I submitted - just wondering about google-ness > of it... shattered has a lot of google juice. I was thinking about turning this FAQ entry into a more or less generic statement

Re: [PATCH] Tweak the SHA-1 FAQ entry

2017-07-07 Thread Jacek Materna
Shouldn't vulnerability / shattered remain a keyword? I believe it was a comment in the patch I submitted - just wondering about google-ness of it... shattered has a lot of google juice. collision vs. 'shattered / vulnerability' Otherwise more complete verbiage is always good. On Fri, Jul 7, 201

RE: [PATCH] Tweak the SHA-1 FAQ entry

2017-07-07 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Evgeny Kotkov [mailto:evgeny.kot...@visualsvn.com] > Sent: vrijdag 7 juli 2017 16:46 > To: Subversion Development > Subject: [PATCH] Tweak the SHA-1 FAQ entry > > Hi all, > > I made an attempt to tweak the SHA-1 FAQ entry (wh

[PATCH] Tweak the SHA-1 FAQ entry

2017-07-07 Thread Evgeny Kotkov
Hi all, I made an attempt to tweak the SHA-1 FAQ entry (which is available at https://subversion.apache.org/faq#shattered-sha1) to make it a bit more user-friendly. Please see the attached patch. What do you think about making a change like this? For convenience, here is the final result as pla