RE: Recurse into same-repos externals at commit time. (was: [PATCH] don't recursively-commit pegged file externals)

2011-08-29 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: C. Michael Pilato [mailto:cmpil...@collab.net] > Sent: maandag 29 augustus 2011 17:40 > To: Neels J Hofmeyr > Cc: Subversion Development > Subject: Recurse into same-repos externals at commit time. (was: [PATCH] > don't recu

Recurse into same-repos externals at commit time. (was: [PATCH] don't recursively-commit pegged file externals)

2011-08-29 Thread C. Michael Pilato
On 08/29/2011 11:33 AM, C. Michael Pilato wrote: >> ### It is also debatable if we should also skip *un*pegged file externals >> from recursion, just like we do with dir externals. > > I tend to lobby for treatment of file externals more consistently with > directory externals. But now that our c

Re: [PATCH] don't recursively-commit pegged file externals

2011-08-29 Thread C. Michael Pilato
On 08/29/2011 11:21 AM, Neels J Hofmeyr wrote: > Anyone up for discussing the two '###'-comments in this patch's log message? > I think this patch is necessary, but feel free to discuss it to smithereens. > I'd say +1 for both '###'-comments, for consistency with dir externals. [...] > ### It is

[PATCH] don't recursively-commit pegged file externals

2011-08-29 Thread Neels J Hofmeyr
Anyone up for discussing the two '###'-comments in this patch's log message? I think this patch is necessary, but feel free to discuss it to smithereens. I'd say +1 for both '###'-comments, for consistency with dir externals. Omit pegged file externals (that have a specific rev) from recursive comm