On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 5:34 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> On 20.06.2013 17:27, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>>...
>>> Also please believe that all my technical thoughts are fair and
>>> related to technical issues only. My veto above is a technical veto.
>
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 5:34 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 20.06.2013 17:27, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>...
>> Also please believe that all my technical thoughts are fair and
>> related to technical issues only. My veto above is a technical veto.
>
> Yep, it was. And I still maintain it's invalid, or at l
On 20.06.2013 17:27, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> Mark,
>
> Wearing my VisualSVN CTO hat:
> VisualSVN is a commercial company. And CollabNET is a commercial
> company. That's not a surprise.
>
> And it's not a surprise that VisualSVN Server authentication works
> fine after upgrade to Subversion 1.8. We ha
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 5:27 PM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> Mark,
>
..
> Also please believe that all my technical thoughts are fair and
> related to technical issues only. My veto above is a technical veto.
I personally never doubted this based on your first mail, but that's
just because I know serf a
From: kmra...@rockwellcollins.com [mailto:kmra...@rockwellcollins.com]
> > Did you read my email above? Let me explain again. Server advertises
> > supported authentication schemes, for example Microsoft IIS:
> > [[[
> > C: GET / HTTP/1.1
> > S: HTTP/1.1 401 Authorization Required
> > S: WWW-Authe
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> Mark,
>
> Wearing my VisualSVN CTO hat:
> VisualSVN is a commercial company. And CollabNET is a commercial
> company. That's not a surprise.
>
> And it's not a surprise that VisualSVN Server authentication works
> fine after upgrade to Subvers
> Did you read my email above? Let me explain again. Server advertises
> supported authentication schemes, for example Microsoft IIS:
> [[[
> C: GET / HTTP/1.1
> S: HTTP/1.1 401 Authorization Required
> S: WWW-Authenticate: NTLM
> S: WWW-Authenticate: Negotiate
> S: WWW-Authenticate: Basic
> ]]]
>
Mark,
Wearing my VisualSVN CTO hat:
VisualSVN is a commercial company. And CollabNET is a commercial
company. That's not a surprise.
And it's not a surprise that VisualSVN Server authentication works
fine after upgrade to Subversion 1.8. We have spent months with
testing and debugging. It will be
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 04:24:14PM +0200, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 20.06.2013 16:00, Mark Phippard wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> > I fail to see how you can justify a veto here.
>
> I have to agree. The veto is fine on aesthetic grounds but kind of fails
> to ta
On 20.06.2013 16:00, Mark Phippard wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 5:44 PM, Mark Phippard wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 9:40 AM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 5:30 PM, Bert Huijben wrote:
[...]
> The pa
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 5:44 PM, Mark Phippard wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 9:40 AM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 5:30 PM, Bert Huijben wrote:
>>> [...]
>>>
The patch to serf 1.2.1 attached to this mail is a (tiny
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 5:44 PM, Mark Phippard wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 9:40 AM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 5:30 PM, Bert Huijben wrote:
>> [...]
>>
>>> The patch to serf 1.2.1 attached to this mail is a (tiny bit cleaned up)
>>> hack based on the old code in ra_serf,
> -Original Message-
> From: Ivan Zhakov [mailto:i...@visualsvn.com]
> Sent: donderdag 20 juni 2013 15:41
> To: serf-...@googlegroups.com; Bert Huijben
> Cc: dev@subversion.apache.org; Gert Kello
> Subject: Re: [serf-dev] [Patch] Adding NTLM Support to Serf -
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 9:40 AM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 5:30 PM, Bert Huijben wrote:
> [...]
>
>> The patch to serf 1.2.1 attached to this mail is a (tiny bit cleaned up)
>> hack based on the old code in ra_serf, some code from an old serf branch and
>> the new in serf auth_
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 5:30 PM, Bert Huijben wrote:
[...]
> The patch to serf 1.2.1 attached to this mail is a (tiny bit cleaned up)
> hack based on the old code in ra_serf, some code from an old serf branch and
> the new in serf auth_kerb code, which re-enables the NTLM authentication
> scheme
15 matches
Mail list logo
