SUMMARY:
+1 to release
PLATFORM:
Windows 7
VS 2008 SP1
Java 1.6
COMPONENTS:
Apache2.2.15
OpenSSL 1.0.0a
Neon0.29.6
ZLib 1.2.4
VERIFIED:
signature and sha1
TESTED:
JavaHL
ra_local | ra_svn
RESULTS:
All passed
SIGNATURES:
subversion-1.6.20.zip
---
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Ben Reser wrote:
> Voting is at
> UNIX: 3
> Windows: 2
>
> Anyone working on doing the last Windows vote so I can release today?
Hate to be a nag but we are still lacking a Windows vote on this.
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 12:54 PM, Ben Reser wrote:
> The 1.6.20 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing.
> Please get the tarballs from
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
> and add your signatures there. I plan to try and release on January
> 4th so please try an
Summary:
+1 to release
Platform
Mac OS X 10.8.2 Mountain Lion, build 12C2034
Standard dependencies:
clang(++) 4.1/LLVM 3.1svn
APR 1.4.5
APR-Util 1.3.12
zlib 1.2.5
httpd 2.2.22
OpenSSL 0.9.8r
SQLite 3.7.12
Java 1.6.0_37
Python 2.7
On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 12:26:22AM -0800, Ben Reser wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 8:38 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > Summary: +1 to release
>
> I noticed you signed the zip file. Just wanting to clarify that your
> vote is for UNIX only right?
Yes, it's just that the release.py target signs
Philip Herron writes:
> aptitude shows me i am on 0.2.0-1 from archive.debian.org since this is
> lenny.
All 1.6.x releases require serf to be at least 0.3.0. If you build 1.6
on this platform in the past you must have built it without serf or used
a different serf package or patched the Subver
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 12:54 PM, Ben Reser wrote:
> The 1.6.20 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing.
> Please get the tarballs from
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
> and add your signatures there. I plan to try and release on January
> 4th so please try an
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 8:38 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> Summary: +1 to release
>
> Tested: [bdb | fsfs] x [ra_local | ra_svn | ra_neon | ra_serf]
> swig bindings
> javahl bindings
>
> Test results: Tests passed, except:
> ra_local-bdb:
> FAIL: diff_tests.py 32: repos-wc diff
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 9:54 PM, Ben Reser wrote:
> The 1.6.20 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing.
> Please get the tarballs from
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
> and add your signatures there. I plan to try and release on January
> 4th so please try and
On 03/01/13 00:53, Philip Martin wrote:
> Philip Herron writes:
>
>> For the libserf thing on debian 5 i get
>>
>> /home/wandisco/SUBVERSION/BUILDS/subversion-1.6.20-1356654074.89/subversion/libsvn_ra_serf/ra_serf.h:40:2:
>> error: #error Please update your version of serf to at least 0.3.0.
>
>
Philip Herron writes:
> For the libserf thing on debian 5 i get
>
> /home/wandisco/SUBVERSION/BUILDS/subversion-1.6.20-1356654074.89/subversion/libsvn_ra_serf/ra_serf.h:40:2:
> error: #error Please update your version of serf to at least 0.3.0.
Did this work with 1.6.19? I don't think Subversio
On 03/01/13 00:30, Ben Reser wrote:
> This is somewhat offtopic for the release.
>
> On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Philip Herron
> wrote:
>> Debian 5 wouldn't build because needing libserf >= 0.3.0 i could try and
>> remove libserf from the build but tempted to see this as a push to stop
>> sup
On 03/01/13 00:22, Philip Martin wrote:
> Philip Herron writes:
>
>> On 02/01/13 19:22, Ben Reser wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Paul Burba wrote:
Gah, sorry about that. Fixed.
>>>
>>> Thanks, no big deal.
>>>
>> I seem to be having issues getting --with-kwallet on rhel 6 to w
This is somewhat offtopic for the release.
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Philip Herron
wrote:
> Debian 5 wouldn't build because needing libserf >= 0.3.0 i could try and
> remove libserf from the build but tempted to see this as a push to stop
> support for debian 5. Since i bet later releases o
Philip Herron writes:
> On 02/01/13 19:22, Ben Reser wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Paul Burba wrote:
>>> Gah, sorry about that. Fixed.
>>
>> Thanks, no big deal.
>>
> I seem to be having issues getting --with-kwallet on rhel 6 to work.
>
> kwallet.h lives in /usr/include/kde4 and
On 02/01/13 19:22, Ben Reser wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Paul Burba wrote:
>> Gah, sorry about that. Fixed.
>
> Thanks, no big deal.
>
I seem to be having issues getting --with-kwallet on rhel 6 to work.
kwallet.h lives in /usr/include/kde4 and it wants to link against
libkdecore
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Paul Burba wrote:
> Gah, sorry about that. Fixed.
Thanks, no big deal.
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Ben Reser wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Paul Burba wrote:
>> SIGNATURE:
>> ---
>> user: "Paul T. Burba "
>> 4096-bit RSA key, ID 56F3D7BC, created 2012-12-11
>>
>> For https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion/subversion-1.6.20.zip:
>>
>
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Paul Burba wrote:
> SIGNATURE:
> ---
> user: "Paul T. Burba "
> 4096-bit RSA key, ID 56F3D7BC, created 2012-12-11
>
> For https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion/subversion-1.6.20.zip:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (Mi
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Ben Reser wrote:
> The 1.6.20 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing.
> Please get the tarballs from
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
> and add your signatures there. I plan to try and release on January
> 4th so please try and
Summary:
+1 to release
Platform:
Linux (Debian/wheezy)
Tested:
(local, svn, svn+sasl, serf, neon) x (fsfs, fsfs/pack/shard, bdb)
swig-pl, swig-py, swig-rb
javahl x (fsfs, bdb)
Results:
Testsuite fails for diff_tests.py 32, log_tests.py 30, and Ruby SWIG
dump_test. These are kn
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Bert Huijben wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:d...@daniel.shahaf.name]
>> Sent: maandag 31 december 2012 08:55
>> To: Johan Corveleyn
>> Cc: Ben Reser; Subversion Development
>>
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 4:35 AM, Bert Huijben wrote:
> I think the necessary patches are in
> ^/subversion/branches/subversion/branches/1.6.x-serf-1-win32
I think the reason 1.6.x doesn't have serf-1 fixes is because we've
been trying to limit 1.6.x to security and stability fixes. Serf is
an op
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:d...@daniel.shahaf.name]
> Sent: maandag 31 december 2012 08:55
> To: Johan Corveleyn
> Cc: Ben Reser; Subversion Development
> Subject: Re: 1.6.20 up for testing/signing
>
> Johan Corveleyn wrote on Mon, Dec 31
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 01:50:19 +0100:
> I remember I could successfully build 1.6.19 with serf-0.7.1, so maybe
> I'll just do that for 1.6.20 too. However, maybe it's easy to fix
> this? The problem seems to be that, from serf-1.0 onwards, the
> resulting lib file is serf-1.
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 9:54 PM, Ben Reser wrote:
> The 1.6.20 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing.
> Please get the tarballs from
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
> and add your signatures there. I plan to try and release on January
> 4th so please try and
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 12:54:00PM -0800, Ben Reser wrote:
> The 1.6.20 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing.
> Please get the tarballs from
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
> and add your signatures there. I plan to try and release on January
> 4th so please
The 1.6.20 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing.
Please get the tarballs from
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
and add your signatures there. I plan to try and release on January
4th so please try and get your votes/signatures in place by January
3rd EOD. Than
28 matches
Mail list logo
