Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Stefan Fuhrmann
wrote:
Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
The branch should also probably have a catch-up merge to prevent it
from diverging too far. I'm happy to do so, as well as fix up any
style nits which may exist on the branch. I'll d
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 1:39 PM, Hyrum K. Wright
wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 11:19 AM, Hyrum K. Wright
> wrote:
>> As I recall, Stefan recently declared the performance branch "done".
>> It's encouraging to see a few intrepid users and devs looking at the
>> branch and providing feedback.
>>
>
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Stefan Fuhrmann
wrote:
> Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
>>
>> As I recall, Stefan recently declared the performance branch "done".
>>
>
> Correct. I've just been polishing parts of it over the last
> two weeks or so.
>>
>> It's encouraging to see a few intrepid users and de
Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
As I recall, Stefan recently declared the performance branch "done".
Correct. I've just been polishing parts of it over the last
two weeks or so.
It's encouraging to see a few intrepid users and devs looking at the
branch and providing feedback.
Through IRC and other
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 11:19 AM, Hyrum K. Wright
wrote:
> As I recall, Stefan recently declared the performance branch "done".
> It's encouraging to see a few intrepid users and devs looking at the
> branch and providing feedback.
>
> Through IRC and other conversations, I've gotten the feeling th
As I recall, Stefan recently declared the performance branch "done".
It's encouraging to see a few intrepid users and devs looking at the
branch and providing feedback.
Through IRC and other conversations, I've gotten the feeling that some
of the changes made on the branch might be a bit too wide-
6 matches
Mail list logo
