Bert Huijben writes:
> The more interesting question is: what is the status of this branch?
>
> I would like to see this merged to trunk, unless there are some new problems.
(Sorry for the delay in response.)
I think that the new API makes sense by itself, and could be useful. But
we didn't se
; From: kot...@apache.org [mailto:kot...@apache.org]
> Sent: zaterdag 9 januari 2016 19:59
> To: comm...@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: svn commit: r1723876 - in /subversion/branches/fs-node-
> api/subversion: include/svn_fs.h libsvn_fs/fs-loader.c libsvn_fs/fs-loader.h
> libsvn_fs/
sense because the switch-over to the new API will be
very noisy. Otherwise, it could be done on /trunk
directly - and be reverted again if necessary.
I don't like developing new features in branches, so I consider this
branch as experiment to explore the FS node API idea and ma
Bert Huijben writes:
> A quick review showed one minor issue, see inline.
[...]
>> @@ -2399,6 +2422,17 @@ svn_fs_file_length(svn_filesize_t *lengt
>> * @since New in 1.6.
>> */
>> svn_error_t *
>> +svn_fs_file_checksum2(svn_checksum_t **checksum,
>> + svn_checksum_kind
A quick review showed one minor issue, see inline.
> -Original Message-
> From: kot...@apache.org [mailto:kot...@apache.org]
> Sent: zondag 10 januari 2016 04:21
> To: comm...@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: svn commit: r1723900 - in /subversion/branches/fs-node-
&
rtly in code for the new API.
>
> -- Stefan^2.
>
>
> Questions / Feedback to fs-node-api as of r1723819
> --
>
> [Not commenting on the implementation since that depends
> on points in the other sections.]
>
> * BRANCH-README:
s.
Below there is a list of questions that I had when
reviewing the first few commits. There are also sections
on what I have in mind and partly in code for the new API.
-- Stefan^2.
Questions / Feedback to fs-node-api as of r1723819
--
[Not comm
7 matches
Mail list logo
