Philip Martin philip.mar...@wandisco.com writes:
I'd like to enable NODES as a replacement for BASE_NODE and
WORKING_NODE. This would involve bumping the format number, and old
working copies would get automatically upgraded.
This has been committed to trunk.
--
Philip
I'd like to enable NODES as a replacement for BASE_NODE and
WORKING_NODE. This would involve bumping the format number, and old
working copies would get automatically upgraded.
This is not the final NODES data model. It currently just uses
NODES.op_depth as 0 or 2 to indicate the equivalent of
On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 09:32 +0100, Philip Martin wrote:
I'd like to enable NODES as a replacement for BASE_NODE and
WORKING_NODE. This would involve bumping the format number, and old
working copies would get automatically upgraded.
+1 from me, ASAP.
We're still working on the op_depth
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 3:32 AM, Philip Martin
philip.mar...@wandisco.com wrote:
I'd like to enable NODES as a replacement for BASE_NODE and
WORKING_NODE. This would involve bumping the format number, and old
working copies would get automatically upgraded.
This is not the final NODES data
Hyrum K. Wright hyrum_wri...@mail.utexas.edu writes:
philip.mar...@wandisco.com wrote:
The disadvantages include: a wc upgrade, the testsuite is slightly
(maybe 2% on my machine) slower.
Are there any explanations for this behavior?
I haven't profiled it. It could be the NODES queries
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Julian Foad julian.f...@wandisco.com wrote:
On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 09:32 +0100, Philip Martin wrote:
I'd like to enable NODES as a replacement for BASE_NODE and
WORKING_NODE. This would involve bumping the format number, and old
working copies would get
-Original Message-
From: Erik Huelsmann [mailto:ehu...@gmail.com]
Sent: woensdag 6 oktober 2010 17:46
To: Julian Foad
Cc: Philip Martin; dev@subversion.apache.org
Subject: Re: Format 20 upgrade to NODES
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Julian Foad julian.f...@wandisco.com
wrote
What about upgrades from f10 or f19?
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 04:32, Philip Martin philip.mar...@wandisco.com wrote:
I'd like to enable NODES as a replacement for BASE_NODE and
WORKING_NODE. This would involve bumping the format number, and old
working copies would get automatically upgraded.
Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com writes:
What about upgrades from f10 or f19?
Upgrading from 1.6 works just as well with NODES as with BASE/WORKING,
we write NODES with op_depth 0 or 2. Ugrading from wcng 19 to 20 is
very simple, we just copy into NODES with op_depth 0 or 2.
--
Philip
Philip Martin wrote on Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 19:00:58 +0100:
Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com writes:
What about upgrades from f10 or f19?
Upgrading from 1.6 works just as well with NODES as with BASE/WORKING,
we write NODES with op_depth 0 or 2. Ugrading from wcng 19 to 20 is
very simple, we
Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name writes:
Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com writes:
What about upgrades from f10 or f19?
Upgrading from 1.6 works just as well with NODES as with BASE/WORKING,
we write NODES with op_depth 0 or 2. Ugrading from wcng 19 to 20 is
very simple, we just copy
Philip Martin wrote on Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 20:31:56 +0100:
Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name writes:
Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com writes:
What about upgrades from f10 or f19?
Upgrading from 1.6 works just as well with NODES as with BASE/WORKING,
we write NODES with op_depth 0
Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name writes:
Okay, but I can do the f16-f18 upgrade using head of trunk, right?
Yes, as far as I know. None of that code has changed.
--
Philip
13 matches
Mail list logo
