On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 05:37:22PM +0200, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> In any case: let's not special-case people because they came to us via GSOC.
Yes. That's how we've handled it in the past, and it has worked well.
In any case: let's not special-case people because they came to us via GSOC.
IOW: whatever policy we decide on should apply equally to GSOC-sponsored
and other contributors.
Stefan Sperling wrote on Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 10:20:49 +0100:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 04:24:46PM -0400, Mark Phippard wro
As a GSOC student, I'm more interested in making a progress on my
development experience and skills. And whether to working on trunk is
not so important, however, I wish my work can be packed into the new
release for wide users, the earlier the better!
2011/3/19 Stefan Sperling :
> On Fri, Mar 18
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 04:24:46PM -0400, Mark Phippard wrote:
> Working on trunk is no panacea that guarantees a student is going to
> get quality review. I do not even see where it would make sense for a
> student to be on trunk (depending on the task). The real issue is
> that we probably do n
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 02:53:17PM -0500, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
> Another GSoC consideration is that it would be nice to have students
> contributing directly to trunk. But with the 1.7 release "feature
> freeze"[1] on going until we branch, they'd have to work on feature
> branches, which get les
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 4:20 PM, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Mark Phippard wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 22:46, Mark Phippard wrote:
Something that came up on the list recently was adding support for
>
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Mark Phippard wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 22:46, Mark Phippard wrote:
>>> Something that came up on the list recently was adding support for
>>> pipelined commits via ra_serf. Would this make a good GSOC
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 22:46, Mark Phippard wrote:
>> Something that came up on the list recently was adding support for
>> pipelined commits via ra_serf. Would this make a good GSOC project?
>> It seems like the kind of "engineering" challen
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 22:46, Mark Phippard wrote:
> Something that came up on the list recently was adding support for
> pipelined commits via ra_serf. Would this make a good GSOC project?
> It seems like the kind of "engineering" challenge that might appeal to
> a student. I have no idea if it
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Mark Phippard wrote:
> Something that came up on the list recently was adding support for
> pipelined commits via ra_serf. Would this make a good GSOC project?
> It seems like the kind of "engineering" challenge that might appeal to
> a student. I have no idea if
Something that came up on the list recently was adding support for
pipelined commits via ra_serf. Would this make a good GSOC project?
It seems like the kind of "engineering" challenge that might appeal to
a student. I have no idea if it is too big or small for GSOC. For
example, I have no idea i
11 matches
Mail list logo
