On 04/20/2011 07:40 PM, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
> Literally main(). Setting up caching limits etc. is similar
> to creating the apr root pool and limiting its allocator -
> which is done inside main().
>
> Also, this is clearly tool-specific as svn.exe seems to be
> the only tool that would want to
On 18.04.2011 21:09, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
On 04/16/2011 08:40 AM, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
On 14.04.2011 22:32, Branko Čibej wrote:
On 14.04.2011 21:03, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 14:43 -0400, "C. Michael Pilato"
wrote:
I'm honestly not quite sure exactly where the right pl
On 04/16/2011 08:40 AM, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
> On 14.04.2011 22:32, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> On 14.04.2011 21:03, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>>> On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 14:43 -0400, "C. Michael Pilato"
>>> wrote:
I'm honestly not quite sure exactly where the right place is. I don't
really see wh
On 14.04.2011 22:32, Branko Čibej wrote:
On 14.04.2011 21:03, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 14:43 -0400, "C. Michael Pilato"
wrote:
On 04/13/2011 06:52 PM, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
The code in question has evolved over many months so it is
very possible that the name of svn_fs_get_c
On 14.04.2011 21:03, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 14:43 -0400, "C. Michael Pilato"
> wrote:
>> On 04/13/2011 06:52 PM, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
>>> The code in question has evolved over many months so it is
>>> very possible that the name of svn_fs_get_cache_config()
>>> and friends i
On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 14:43 -0400, "C. Michael Pilato"
wrote:
> On 04/13/2011 06:52 PM, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
> > The code in question has evolved over many months so it is
> > very possible that the name of svn_fs_get_cache_config()
> > and friends is no longer appropriate. The same goes for the
On 04/13/2011 06:52 PM, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
> The code in question has evolved over many months so it is
> very possible that the name of svn_fs_get_cache_config()
> and friends is no longer appropriate. The same goes for the
> place that this has been implemented.
>
> From a design perspective
On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 00:52 +0200, "Stefan Fuhrmann"
wrote:
> On 13.04.2011 03:14, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> > On 04/12/2011 05:11 PM, arfre...@apache.org wrote:
> >> Author: arfrever
> >> Date: Tue Apr 12 21:11:46 2011
> >> New Revision: 1091573
> >>
> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=109
On 13.04.2011 03:14, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
On 04/12/2011 05:11 PM, arfre...@apache.org wrote:
Author: arfrever
Date: Tue Apr 12 21:11:46 2011
New Revision: 1091573
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1091573&view=rev
Log:
Followup to r1090784:
* build.conf
(libsvn_ra.libs): Add libsvn_
On 04/12/2011 05:11 PM, arfre...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: arfrever
> Date: Tue Apr 12 21:11:46 2011
> New Revision: 1091573
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1091573&view=rev
> Log:
> Followup to r1090784:
>
> * build.conf
> (libsvn_ra.libs): Add libsvn_fs_util.
Whoa. This doesn't
10 matches
Mail list logo
